Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 97–114 | Cite as

Corruption in Asia: Pervasiveness and arbitrariness



How does one understand the differences and similarities of corruption among various Asian countries? We use a recent framework developed by Rodriguez, Uhlenbruck, and Eden (2005) to suggest that corruption has to be examined from two different dimensions: pervasiveness and arbitrariness. Using this framework, we ask why some Asian countries are able to achieve high levels of economic growth in the midst of high level corruption while other countries suffer from economic stagnation. We specifically suggest that more firms would bribe when pervasiveness is high, while fewer firms would bribe when arbitrariness is high. We also look into the implications on foreign direct investment.


Corruption Pervasiveness Arbitrariness 


  1. Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. 2004. Turnaround in Asia: Laying the foundation for understanding this unique domain. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad, N., & Brookins, O. 2004. On corruption and countervailing actions in three South Asian nations. Journal of Policy Reform, 7(1): 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anand, V., Ashforth, B., & Joshi, M. 2004. Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption on organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2): 39–53.Google Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B., & Anand, V. 2003. The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25: 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bae, K., Kang, J., & Lim, C. 2002. Tunneling or value added: evidence from mergers by Korean business groups. Journal of Financial Economics, 64: 2695–2740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barreto, R. 2000. Endogenous corruption in a neoclassical growth model. European Economic Review, 44: 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertrand, M., Djankov, S., Hanna, R., & Mullainathan, S. 2006. Does Corruption Produce Unsafe Drivers?. Working paper. Presented at the Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  8. Bjornskov, C., & Paldam, M. 2005. Corruption trend. In Lambsdorff, J., Taube, M., & Schramm, M. (Eds.) The new institutional economics of corruption (pp.59–75). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Blackburn, K. Bose, N., & Haque, E. 2004. Endogenous corruption in economic development. Research paper 2004–16. Nottingham University, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Boddewyn, J. J. 1988. Political aspects of MNE theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunetti, A., Kisunko, G., & Weder, B. 1998. Credibility of rules and economic growth: Evidence from a worldwide survey of the private sector. World Bank Economic Review, 12(3): 353–384.Google Scholar
  12. Business Week. 2001. Malaysia’s ministerless finance ministry. Jun. 5.Google Scholar
  13. Business Week. 2006. India’s new Cola wars. Aug. 24.Google Scholar
  14. Campos, J. E., Lien, D., & Pradhan, S. 1999. The impact of corruption on investment: Predictability matters. World Development, 27(6): 1059–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carney, M. 2004. The institutions of industrial restructuring in Southeast Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chang, S. 2003. Ownership structure, expropriation, and performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2): 238–253.Google Scholar
  17. Delios, A., & Henisz, W. 2003. Political hazards, experience and sequential entry strategies: The international expansion of Japanese firms, 1980–1998. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11): 1153–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 2002. The regulation of entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doh, J., Rodriguez, P., Uhlenbruck, K., Collins, J., & Eden, L. 2003. Coping with corruption in foreign markets. Academy of Management Executive, 17(3):114–127.Google Scholar
  20. Duggan, M., & Levitt S. D. 2002. Winning isn’t everything: Corruption in sumo wrestling. American Economic Review, 92(5): 1594–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Economist. 2002. Corruption abounding. Sep. 24, V 364: 46–46.Google Scholar
  22. Economist. 2002. Beware of the watchdog. Aug. 17, V 364:35–35.Google Scholar
  23. Economist. 2004. Who will watch the watchdogs? Feb. 21, V 379: 39–40.Google Scholar
  24. Economist. 2006. An understated success. May 27, V 379: 14–15.Google Scholar
  25. Encarnation, D., & Vachani, S. 1985. Foreign ownership: When hosts change the rules. Harvard Business Review, 1985, September–October: 152–159.Google Scholar
  26. Far Eastern Economic Review. 1974. Graft: Almost a way of life. Far Eastern Economic Review, 3: 22–31, September 6.Google Scholar
  27. Fisman, R. 2001. Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review, 91(4): 1095–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fisman, R., & Wei, S. 2004. Tax rates and tax evasion: Evidence from “Missing imports” in China. Journal of Political Economy, 112(2): 471–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gill, S. 1998. The pathology of corruption. New Delhi: Harper Collins India.Google Scholar
  30. Gong, T. 2002. Dangerous collusion: Corruption as a collective venture in contemporary China. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 35: 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gordon, K., & Miyaki, M. 2001. Business approaches to combating bribery: A study of codes of conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 34: 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Habib, M., & Zurawicki, L. 2002. Corruption and foreign direct investment, Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2): 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Herrera, A., & Rodriguez, P. 2003. Bribery and the nature of corruption. Working paper.Google Scholar
  34. Hill, C. 2007. Digital piracy: Causes, consequences, and strategic responses. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, (in press).Google Scholar
  35. Husted, Bryan W. 1999. Wealth, culture, and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 30: 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson, S., & Mitton, T. 2003. Cronyism and capital controls: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Financial Economics, 67: 351–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Khan, Mushtaq H. 1998. Patron–client networks and the economic effects of corruption in Asia. In Robinson, Mark (Ed.) Corruption and Development. London: Cass.Google Scholar
  38. Khwaja, A., & Mian, A. 2005. Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4): 1371–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Klitgaard, R. 1988. Controlling corruption. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lenway, S., Morck, R., & Yeung, B. 1996. Rent seeking, protectionism and innovation in the American steel industry. Economic Journal, 106: 410–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Luo, Y. 2002. Corruption and organization in Asian management systems. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19: 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Management Services. 1996. Bribery could cost British businesses £ 2.5 billion in lost contract. 40(11): 6.Google Scholar
  44. Mauro, P. 1995. Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3): 681–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mauro, P. 1998. Corruption: Causes, consequences, and agenda for further research. Finance & Development March: 11–14.Google Scholar
  46. Mbaku, J. M. 2000. Bureaucratic and political corruption in Africa: The public choice perspective. Kreiger, Malabar.Google Scholar
  47. Meyer, K. 2006. Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Milovanovic, M. 2002. Endogenous corruption in privatized companies. Working paper.Google Scholar
  49. Moran, J. 1999. Patterns of corruption and development in East Asia. Third World Quarterly, 20(3): 569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oh, K., & Lee, S. 2006. Dual institutional pressures in MNEs: The case of corruption in transition economies. Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas.Google Scholar
  51. Olken, B. 2005a. Corruption and the costs of redistribution: Micro evidence from Inonesia, NBER. (March and October).Google Scholar
  52. Olken, B. 2005b. Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Manuscript, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  53. Pacini, C., Swingen, J., & Rogers, H. 2002. The role of the OECD and EU Conventions in combating bribery of foreign public officials. Journal of Business Ethics, 37: 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peng, M. W. 2006. Global strategy. Cincinnati: Thomson South-Western.Google Scholar
  55. Peng, M. W., & Zhou, J. Q. 2005. How network strategies and institutional transitions evolve in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22: 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peng, M. W., & Delios, A. 2006. What determines the scope of the firm over time and around the world? An Asia Pacific perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4): 34.Google Scholar
  57. Quah, J. T. 1982. Bureaucratic corruption in the Asian countries: A comparative analysis of their anti-corruption strategies. Journal of Southern Asian Studies, 13(1): 153–177.Google Scholar
  58. Quah, J. T. 1989. Singapore’s experience in curbing corruption. In Heidenheimer, A., Johnston, M., & LeVine, V. (Eds.) Political Corruption: A handbook. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  59. Quah, J. T. 1995. Controlling corruption in city-states: A comparative study of Hong Kong and Singapore. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 22: 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Quah, J. T. 1999. Corruption in Asian countries: Can it be minimized? Public Administrative Review, 59(6): 483–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Quah, J. T. 2002. Globalization and corruption control in Asian countries: The case for divergence. Public Management Review, 4(1): 453–470.Google Scholar
  62. RECOF. 2005. Research report on the trend of inward FDI into Japan: Fiscal year 2004. Tokyo: Cabinet Office, Government of Japan.Google Scholar
  63. Reinikka, R., & Svensson, J. 2005. Using micro-surveys to measure and explain corruption. World Development, 34(2): 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ring, P. S., Lenway, S. A., & Govekar, M. 1990. Management of the political imperative in international business. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2): 141–151.Google Scholar
  65. Robertson, C. J., & Watson, A. (2004). Corruption and change: The impact of foreign direct investment. Strategic Management Journal, 25(4): 295–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rock, M., & Bonnett, H. 2004. The comparative politics of corruption: Accounting for the East Asian paradox in empirical studies of corruption, growth and investment. World Development, 32(6): 999–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rodriguez, P., Uhlenbruck, K., & Eden, L. (2005). Government corruption and the entry strategies of multinationals. Academy of Management Review, 30(2): 383–396.Google Scholar
  68. Rose-Ackerman, S. 1978. Corruption: A study in political economy. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  69. Rose-Ackerman, S. 1999. Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Sanyal, R. 2004. Correlates of bribe giving in international business: Corrupt practices of business. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 14(2): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sanyal, R. 2005. Determinants of bribery in international business: The cultural and economic factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 59: 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sanyal, R., & Samanta, S. 2002. Determinants of bribery in international business. Thunderbird International Business Review, 46(2): 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1993. Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Straits Times. 1996. April 9, 3.Google Scholar
  75. Svensson, J. 2003. Who must pay bribes and how much? Evidence from a cross section of firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1): 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tanzi, V. 1998. Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope and cures. Working paper no. 98/63, IMF, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  77. Transparency International. 1995 through 2005. Global Corruption Report.Google Scholar
  78. Transparency International India. 2005. India corruption study 2005. New Delhi.Google Scholar
  79. Uhlenbruck, K., Rodriguez, P., Doh, J., & Eden, L. 2006. The impact of corruption on entry strategy: Evidence from telecommunication projects in emerging economies. Organization Science, 17(3): 402–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. UNCTAD. 2005. World Investment Report 2005: Transnational corporations and the internationalization of R&D. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  81. UNDP. 1997. Human Development Report 1997: Human development to eradicate poverty. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Voyer, P. A., & Beamish, P. 2004. The effect of corruption on Japanese foreign direct investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(3): 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wang, X., & Zhang, J. 1999. Hei Dong (Black Holes). Dazong wenyi chubanshe, Beijing.Google Scholar
  84. Washington Post. 2006. Wolfowitz’s corruption agenda. Feb, 20.Google Scholar
  85. Wedeman, A. 2002. Development and corruption: The East Asian paradox. In Gomez E. T. (Ed.) Political Business in East Asia (pp. 34–61). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  86. Wei, S.-J. 1997. Why is corruption so much more taxing than tax? Arbitrariness kills. Working paper no. 6255, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  87. Wei, S.-J. 2000. How taxing is corruption on international investors? Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wescott, C. 2003. Combating corruption in Southeast Asia. In Kidd, J., & Richter, F.-J. (Eds.) Fighting corruption in Asia: Causes, effects and remedies. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  89. Xin, K., & Pearce, J. 1996. Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1641–1658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zahra, S., Priem, R., and Rasheed, A. 2005. The antecedents and consequences of top management fraud. Journal of Management, 31(6): 803–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zhang, K. 2002. China’s inward FDI boom and the greater Chinese economy. In Fung, H. & Zhang, K. (Eds.) Financial Markets and Foreign Direct Investments in Greater China (pp. 165–181). Armouk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementThe University of Texas at DallasRichardsonUSA

Personalised recommendations