Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

User profile as a bridge in cross-domain recommender systems for sparsity reduction

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the past two decades, recommender systems have been successfully applied in many e-commerce companies. One of the promising techniques to generate personalized recommendations is collaborative filtering. However, it suffers from sparsity problem. Alleviating this problem, cross-domain recommender systems came into existence in which transfer learning mechanism is applied to exploit the knowledge from other related domains. While applying transfer learning, some information should overlap between source and target domains. Several attempts have been made to enhance the performance of collaborative filtering with the help of other related domains in cross-domain recommender systems framework. Although exploiting the knowledge from other domains is still challenging and open problem in recommender systems. In this paper, we propose a method namely User Profile as a Bridge in Cross-domain Recommender Systems (UP-CDRSs) for transferring knowledge between domains through user profile. Firstly, we build a user profile using demographical information of a user, explicit ratings and content information of user-rated items. Thereafter, the probabilistic graphical model is employed to learn latent factors of users and items in both domains by maximizing posterior probability. At last prediction on unrated item is estimated by an inner product of corresponding latent factors of users and items. Validating of our proposed UP-CDRSs method, we conduct series of experiments on various sparsity levels using cross-domain dataset. The results demonstrate that our proposed method substantially outperforms other without and with transfer learning methods in terms of accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.netflixprize.com

  2. https://grouplens.org/datasets/movielens/10m/

  3. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/?lebanon/IR-lab.htm

References

  1. Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(6):734–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li Z, Zhao H, Liu Q, Huang Z, Mei T, Chen E (2018) Learning from history and present: Next-item recommendation via discriminatively exploiting user behaviors. In: KDD, pp 1734–1743. ACM

  3. Candillier L, Meyer F, Boullé M (2007) Comparing state-of-the-art collaborative filtering systems. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4571:548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang L, Cheng Y, Li Y, Li J, Yan H, Wang X (2018) A trust-based collaborative filtering algorithm for E-commerce recommendation system. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 0(0):0

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bobadilla J, Ortega F, Hernando A, Gutiérrez A (2013) Recommender systems survey. Knowl-Based Syst 46:109–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koohi H, Kiani K, Hwangbo H, Kim Y (2017) A new method to find neighbor users that improves the performance of Collaborative Filtering. Expert Syst Appl 89:254–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang J, Lin Y, Lin M, Liu J (2016) An effective collaborative filtering algorithm based on user preference clustering. Appl Intell 45(2):230–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dakhel AM, Malazi HT, Mahdavi M (2018) A social recommender system using item asymmetric correlation. Appl Intell 48(3):527–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Koren Y, Bell R, Volinsky C (2009) Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Comput 42(8):30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Y, Wang D, He H, Jiao L, Xue Y (2017) Mining intrinsic information by matrix factorization-based approaches for collaborative filtering in recommender systems. Neurocomputing 249:48–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang F, Lu Y, Chen J, Liu S, Ling Z (2017) Robust collaborative filtering based on non-negative matrix factorization and R1-norm. Knowl-Based Syst 118:177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hernando A, Bobadilla J, Ortega F (2016) A non negative matrix factorization for collaborative filtering recommender systems based on a Bayesian probabilistic model. Knowl-Based Syst 97:188–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Himabindu TVR, Padmanabhan V, Pujari AK (2018) Conformal matrix factorization based recommender system. Information Sciences

  14. Salakhutdinov R, Mnih A (2007) Probabilistic matrix factorization. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’07, pp 1257–1264, USA. Curran Associates Inc

  15. Pan W, Yang Q (2013) Transfer learning in heterogeneous collaborative filtering domains. Artif Intell. 197:39–55

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Pan W (2016) A survey of transfer learning for collaborative recommendation with auxiliary data. Neurocomputing 177:447–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xin X, Liu Z, Lin C-Y, Huang H, Wei X, Guo P (2015) Cross-domain collaborative filtering with review text. In: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on artificial intelligence, IJCAI’15, pp 1827–1833. AAAI Press

  18. Guo G, Qiu H, Tan Z, Liu Y, Ma J, Wang X (2017) Resolving data sparsity by multi-type auxiliary implicit feedback for recommender systems. Knowl-Based Syst 138:202–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li B, Yang Q, Xue X (2009) Can movies and books collaborate?: Cross-domain collaborative filtering for sparsity reduction. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Jont conference on artifical intelligence, IJCAI’09, pp 2052–2057, San Francisco, CA, USA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc

  20. Khan MM, Ibrahim R, Ghani I (2017) Cross domain recommender systems: a systematic literature review. ACM Comput Surv 50(3):1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu F, Wang Y, Chen C, Liu G, Orgun M, Wu J (2017) A Deep Framework for Cross-Domain and Cross-System Recommendations. pp 3711–3717

  22. He M, Zhang J, Yang P, Yao K (2018) Robust transfer learning for cross-domain collaborative filtering using multiple rating patterns approximation. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM international conference on web search and data mining - WSDM ’18, pp 225– 233

  23. Pan SJ, Yang Q (2010) A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 22(10):1345–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cremonesi P, Tripodi A, Turrin R (2011) Cross-domain recommender systems. In: ICDMW2011: IEEE 11th international conference on data mining workshops, pp 496–503

  25. Shi Y, Larson M, Hanjalic A (2011) Tags as bridges between domains: improving recommendation with tag-induced cross-domain collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on user modeling, adaption, and personalization, UMAP’11. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 305–316

  26. Enrich M, Braunhofer M, Ricci F (2013) Cold-start management with cross-domain collaborative filtering and tags. Springer, Berlin, pp 101–112

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fernández-Tobí (2014) Exploiting social tags in matrix factorization models for cross-domain collaborative filtering. In: CBREcsys@ recsys, pp 34–41

  28. Sahu AK, Dwivedi P, Kant V (2018) Tags and item features as a bridge for cross-domain recommender systems. Procedia Comput Sci 125:624–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning (information science and statistics). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Al-Shamri MYH (2016) User profiling approaches for demographic recommender systems. Knowl-Based Syst 100:175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ma H, Yang H, Lyu MR, Sorec IK (2008) Social recommendation using probabilistic matrix factorization. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on information and knowledge management, CIKM ’08, pp 931–940, New York, NY, USA. ACM

  32. Yu X, Chu Y, Jiang F, Guo Y, Gong D (2018) Knowledge-based systems SVMs classification based two-side cross domain collaborative filtering by inferring intrinsic user and item features. Knowl-Based Syst 141:80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zheng X, Luo Y, Sun L, Ding X, Ji Z (2018) A novel social network hybrid recommender system based on hypergraph topologic structure. World Wide Web 21(4):985–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chou S-Y, Yang Y-H, Jang J-SR, Lin Y-C (2016) Addressing cold start for next-song recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems - RecSys ’16, pp 115–118

  35. Valdéz ERN, Lovelle JMC, Martínez SO, García-díaz V, Ordoñez de Pablos P, Marín CEM (2012) Implicit feedback techniques on recommender systems applied to electronic books. Comput Hum Behav 28 (4):1186–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Crespo RG, Martínez OS, Lovelle JMC, García-Bustelo CPB, Gayo JEL, Ordoñez de Pablos P (2011) Recommendation system based on user interaction data applied to intelligent electronic books. Comput Hum Behav 27(4):1445–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dang Thanh N, Son LH, Ali M (2017) Neutrosophic recommender system for medical diagnosis based on algebraic similarity measure and clustering. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2017.8015387

  38. Le HS, Thong NT (2015) Intuitionistic fuzzy recommender systems: an effective tool for medical diagnosis. Knowl-based Syst 74:133–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dwivedi P, Bharadwaj KK (2015) E-learning recommender system for a group of learners based on the unified learner profile approach. Expert Syst 32(2):264–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu H, Hu Z, Mian A, Tian H, Zhu X (2014) A new user similarity model to improve the accuracy of collaborative filtering. Knowl-Based Syst 56(Supplement C):156–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Son LH (2015) HU-FCF++: a novel hybrid method for the new user cold-start problem in recommender systems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 41:207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Biswas S, Lakshmanan LVS, Roy SB (2017) Combating the cold start user problem in model based collaborative filtering. CoRR, arXiv:1703.00397

  43. Son LH (2016) Dealing with the new user cold-start problem in recommender systems: a comparative review. Inf Syst 58:87–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Fernández-Tobías I, Cantador I, Kaminskas M, Ricci F (2012) Cross-domain recommender systems: a survey of the state of the art. In: Spanish conference on information retrieval

  45. Winoto P, Tang T (2008) If you like the devil wears prada the book, will you also enjoy the devil wears prada the movie? a study of cross-domain recommendations. N Gener Comput 26(3):209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Berkovsky S, Kuflik T, Ricci F (2007) Cross-Domain mediation in collaborative filtering 2 Cross-Domain mediation in collaborative filtering. User Model 4511:355–359

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hu L, Cao J, Xu G, Cao L, Gu Z, Zhu C (2013) Personalized recommendation via cross-domain triadic factorization. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web - WWW ’13, pp 595–606

  48. Pan W, Xiang EW, Liu NN, Yang Q (2010) Transfer learning in collaborative filtering for sparsity reduction. In: Proceedings of the 24th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, AAAI’10, pp 230–235. AAAI Press

  49. Fang Z, Gao S, Li B, Li J, Liao J (2016) Cross-domain recommendation via tag matrix transfer. In: Proceedings - 15th IEEE international conference on data mining workshop, ICDMW 2015, pp 1235–1240

  50. Zhao L, Pan SJ, Yang Q (2017) A unified framework of active transfer learning for cross-system recommendation. Artif Intell 245:38–55

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Koren Y, Bell R (2015) Advances in collaborative filtering. Recommender systems handbook, 2nd edn. pp 77–118

  52. Li T, Ding C (2006) The relationships among various nonnegative matrix factorization methods for clustering. In: Proceedings - IEEE international conference on data mining, ICDM, (1):362–371

  53. Al-Shamri MYH, Bharadwaj KK (2008) Fuzzy-genetic approach to recommender systems based on a novel hybrid user model. Expert Syst Appl 35(3):1386–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Huang J, Zhu K, Zhong N (2016) A probabilistic inference model for recommender systems. Appl Intell 45(3):686–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Prayagraj, 211004, India

    Ashish Kumar Sahu & Pragya Dwivedi

Authors
  1. Ashish Kumar Sahu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pragya Dwivedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashish Kumar Sahu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahu, A.K., Dwivedi, P. User profile as a bridge in cross-domain recommender systems for sparsity reduction. Appl Intell 49, 2461–2481 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-01402-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-01402-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation