Peer Respites: A Qualitative Assessment of Consumer Experience
This qualitative study explored the experiences of persons staying at two peer respites through interviews with 27 respite guests near the end of their stay and at 2–6 months following their stay. Trained peer interviewers conducted baseline and follow-up interviews. Peer respites can be beneficial spaces within the mental health system for guests to temporarily escape stressful situations while building relationships with other persons with mental illness, though some respondents were uncomfortable receiving services from peers, and several guests did not want to leave after their stay. Ongoing training of peers and orientations for respite guests can help ensure optimal respite experiences.
KeywordsQualitative Peer-respite Mental health services
Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with and the 1964 Helsinki declaration its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study.
Research Involving Human Participants
The Institutional Review Board of University of California, San Diego, Human Research Protection Program, and the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development approved this study.
- Chinman, M., George, P., Dougherty, R. H., Daniels, A. S., Ghose, S. S., Swift, A., et al. (2014). Peer support services for individuals with serious mental illnesses: Assessing the evidence. Psychiatric Services, 65(4), 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201300244.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chinman, M., McInnes, D. K., Eisen, S., Ellison, M., Farkas, M., Armstrong, M., et al. (2017). Establishing a research agenda for understanding the role and impact of mental health peer specialists. Psychiatric Service, 68(9), 955–957. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201700054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greenfield, T. K., Stoneking, B. C., Humphreys, K., Sundby, E., & Bond, J. (2008). A randomized trial of a mental health consumer-managed alternative to civil commitment for acute psychiatric crisis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42(1–2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9180-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Lucksted, A., Drapalski, A., Calmes, C., Forbes, C., DeForge, B., & Boyd, J. (2011). Ending self-stigma: Pilot evaluation of a new intervention to reduce internalized stigma among people with mental illnesses. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 35(1), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.2975/35.1.2011.51.54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mead, S. (2009). Intentional peer support training. West Chesterfield, NH: Shery Mead and Associates.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousnd Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Padgett, D. K. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research: Challenges and rewards. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
- SAMHSA- HRSA Center for Integrated Health Solutions. (2016). Peer providers. Retrieved from http://www.integration.samhsa.gov/workforce/peerproviders.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar