Using a Small Cash Incentive to Increase Survey Response
- 47 Downloads
Surveys tend to yield low response rates among human service professionals. This study examined whether a randomly-assigned prepaid $2 incentive increased response rates over time, and was cost-effective for increasing response count, among social workers and volunteer mediators. The incentive was enclosed with a mixed-mode survey of factors related to burnout and intention-to-remain. The incentive increased response rates over time. The effect of the incentive did not differ between mediators and social workers. The $2 incentive was not cost-effective for increasing response count. Implications are discussed for reducing nonresponse bias, decreasing time-to-response, and considering response rate versus response count.
KeywordsSurvey research Response rate Incentive Mental health services research Behavioral health services research
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
This author is employed by University of Maryland School of Social Work, and has received funding support for educational programs and attending symposia.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual respondents included in the study. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- Allison, P. D. (2004). Event history analysis. In M. B. Hardy (Ed.), Handbook for data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Beebe, T. J., Rey, E., Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Jenkins, S., Lackore, K., Talley, N. J., et al. (2010). Shortening a survey and using alternative forms of prenotification: Impact on response rate and quality. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Beebe, T. J., Stoner, S. M., Anderson, K. J., & Williams, A. R. (2007). Selected questionnaire size and color combinations were significantly related to mailed survey response rates. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(10), 1184–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.01.2006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The Tailored Design Method (4th edn.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Dirmaier, J., Harfst, T., Koch, U., & Schulz, H. (2007). Incentives increased return rates but did not influence partial nonresponse or treatment outcome in a randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(12), 1263–1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Donaldson, G. W., Moinpour, C. M., Bush, N. E., Chapko, M., Jocom, J., Siadak, M., et al. (1999). Physician participation in research surveys: A randomized study of inducements to return mailed research questionnaires. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 22(4), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/01632789922034392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dykema, J., Stevenson, J., Day, B., Sellers, S. L., & Bonham, V. L. (2011). Effects of incentives and prenotification on response rates and costs in a national web survey of physicians. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 34(4), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278711406113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hawley, K. M., Cook, J. R., & Jensen-Doss, A. (2009). Do noncontingent incentives increase survey response rates among mental health providers? A randomized trial comparison. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 36(5), 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/01632789922034392.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kasprzyk, D., Montaño, D. E., St. Lawrence, J. S., & Phillips, W, R. (2001). The effects of variations in mode of delivery and monetary incentive on physicians’ responses to a mailed survey assessing STD practice patterns. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 24(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/01632780122034740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klakovich, M. D. (2005). Improving survey response rates. Sigma Theta Tau International 38th Biennial Convention, Indianapolis, IN. Abstract Retrieved March 20, 2016, from http://stti.confex.com/stti/bcscience38/techprogram/paper_25210.htm.
- Knoll, M., Soller, L., Ben-Shoshan, M., Harrington, D., Fragapane, J., Joseph, L., et al. (2012). The use of incentives in vulnerable populations for a telephone survey: A randomized controlled trial. BioMed Central Research Notes, 5(1), 572–577. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-572.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Schutt, R. K. (1999). Investigating the social world: The process and practice of research (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
- Singer, E., & Kulka, R. A. (2002). Paying respondents for survey participation. In M. Ver, R. A. Ploeg, Moffitt & C. F. Citro (Eds.), Studies of welfare populations: Data collection and research issues (pp. 105–128). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Ulrich, C. M., Danis, M., Koziol, D., Garrett-Mayer, E., Hubbard, R., & Grady, C. (2005). Does it pay to pay? A randomized trial of prepaid financial incentives and lottery incentives in surveys of nonphysician healthcare professionals. Nursing Research, 54(3), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200505000-00005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar