Advertisement

Applied Mathematics and Mechanics

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 57–72 | Cite as

Matrix description of differential relations of moment functions in structural reliability sensitivity analysis

  • Tianxiao ZhangEmail author
Article

Abstract

In a structural system reliability analysis that lacks probabilistic information, calculating the numerical characteristics of the state functions, especially the first four moments of the state functions, is necessary. Based on that, the structural system reliability is analyzed with a fourth-order moment method. The reliability sensitivity is required to conduct the differential operation of the numerical characteristic functions. A reliability sensitivity analysis formula is then derived in combination with the relation of the differential operation. Based on the matrix theory and Kronecker algebra, this paper systematically derives a matrix expression of the first four moments of the state functions, and establishes the matrix relation between the first four moments of the state functions and those of the basic random variables. On this basis, a differential operation formula of the first four moments of the state functions is further derived against the first four moments of the basic random variables. The vector relation between the state functions and the multidimensional basic random variables is described by means of the matrix operation to extend the operation method. Finally, a concise and intuitive formula is obtained to explore the inherent essential relation between the numerical characteristics of the state functions and those of the basic random variables, leading to a universal equation for the two kinds of numerical characteristics.

Keywords

structural system reliability analysis state function numerical characteristic matrix description Kronecker product functional differential reliability sensitivity 

Chinese Library Classification

O213.2 

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification

45A55 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Hasofer, A. M. and Lind, N. C. Exact and invariant second moment code format.. ASCE Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 100, 111–121 (1974)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Parkinson, D. B. First-order reliability analysis employing translation systems. Engineering Structures, 1, 31–40 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Hohenbichler, M. and Rackwitz, R. Non-normal dependent vectors in structural swafety. ASCE Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 107, 1227–1249 (1981)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Hohenbichler, M. and Rackwitz, R. First-order concepts in system reliability. Structural Safety, 1, 177–188 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Der Kiureghian, A. and Liu, P. L. Structural reliability under incomplete probability information.. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 112, 85–104 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Der Kiureghian, A. and de Stefano, M. Efficient algorithm for second-order reliability analysis.. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 117, 2904–2923 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Zhang, Y. M., Chen, S. H., Liu, Q. L., and Liu, T. Q. Stochastic perturbation finite elements.. Computers & Structures, 59, 425–429 (1996)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Zhang, Y. M., Wen, B. C., and Chen, S. H. PFEM formalism in Kronecker notation.. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, 1, 445–461 (1996)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Zhang, Y. M., Wen, B. C., and Liu, Q. L. First passage of uncertain single degree-of-freedom nonlinear oscillators.. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 165, 223–231 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Zhang, Y. M., Liu, Q. L., and Wen, B. C. Quasi-failure analysis on resonant demolition of random structural systems. AIAA Journal, 40, 585–586 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Zhang, Y. M. and Liu, Q. L. Reliability-based design of automobile components. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 216, 455–471 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Montgomery, D. C. Design and Analysis of Experimens, Wiley, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Hurtado, J. E. Structural Reliability: Statistical Learning Perspectives, Springer, Berlin (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Faravelli, L. Response surface approach for reliability analysis.. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 115, 2763–2781 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Bucher, C. G. and Bourgund, U. A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems.. Structural Safety, 7, 57–66 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Rajashekhar, M. R. and Ellingwood, B. R. A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis.. Structural Safety, 12, 205–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Kim, S. H. and Na, S. W. Response surface method using vector projected sampling points.. Structural Safety, 19, 3–19 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Zheng, Y. and Das, P. K. Improved response surface method and its application to stiffened plate reliability analysis.. Engineering Structures, 22, 544–551 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Das, P. K. and Zheng, Y. Cumulative formation of response surface and its use in reliability analysis.. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 15, 309–315 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Guan, X. L. and Melchers, R. E. Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates.. Structural Safety, 23, 429–444 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Der Kiureghian, A. and Ke, J. B. The stochastic finite element method in structural reliability.. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 3, 83–91 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Ghanem, R. G. and Spanos, P. D. Spectral stochastic finite-element formulation for reliability analysis.. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 117, 2351–2372 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Haldar, A. and Mahadevan, S. Reliability Assessment Using Stochastic Finite Element Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (2000)Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Hurtado, J. E. and Alvarez, D. A. Classification approach for reliability analysis with stochastic finite-element modeling.. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 129, 1141–1149 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Vanmarcke, E., Shinozuka, M., Nakagiri, S., Schuëller, G. I., and Grigoriu, M. Random fields and stochastic finite elements.. Structural Safety, 3, 143–166 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Au, S. K. Reliability-based design sensitivity by efficient simulation. Computers & Structures, 83, 1048–1061 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Haukaas, T. and der Kiureghian, A. Parameter sensitivity and importance measures in nonlinear finite element reliability analysis. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 131, 1013–1026 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Sudret, B. Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansion.. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93, 964–979 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Ibrahim, R. A. Structural dynamics with parameter uncertainties.. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 40, 309–328 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Benaroya, H. and Rehak, M. Finite element methods in probabilistic structural analysis: a selective review.. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 41, 201–213 (1988)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Hohenbichler, M. and Rackwitz, R. Sensitivity and importance measures in structural reliability.. Civil Engneering Systems, 3, 203–209 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Bjerager, P. and Krenk, S. Parametric sensitivity in first-order reliability analysis.. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 115, 1577–1582 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Sues, R. H. and Cesare, M. A. System reliability and sensitivity factors via the MPPSS method.. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 20, 148–157 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Wu, Y. T. Computational methods for efficient structural reliability and reliability sensitivity analysis.. AIAA Journal, 32, 1717–1723 (1994)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Alibrandi, U. and Koh, C. G. First-order reliability method for structural reliability analysis in the presence of random and interval variables. ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, 1, 041006 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Du, X. P. and Hu, Z. First-order reliability method with truncated random variables. Journal of Mechanical Design, 134, 091005 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Yao, W., Chen, X. Q., Huang, Y. Y., and Tooren, M. An enhanced unified uncertainty analysis approach based on first-order reliability method with single-level optimization.. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 116, 28–37 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Kang, W. H., Lee, Y. J., Song, J., and Gencturk, B. Further development of matrix-based system reliability method and applications to structural systems.. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8, 441–457 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Guo, S. X. and Lu, Z. Z. A non-probabilistic robust reliability method for analysis and design optimization of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters.. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39, 1985–2002 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Zhao, Y. G. and Ono, T. Moment methods for structural reliability.. Structural Safety, 23, 47–75 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Zhang, T. X. The Reliability Design and Reliability Sensitivity Analysis of Hydraulic Component (in Chinese), Ph.D. dissertation, Jilin Unversity, Jilin (2014)Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Wu, Y. T. and Mohanty, S. Variable screening and ranking using sampling-based sensitivity measures.. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 91, 634–647 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoIllinoisUSA

Personalised recommendations