# Quantum enigma hidden in continuum mechanics

- 57 Downloads

## Abstract

It is reported that there exist deformable media which display quantum effects just as quantum entities do. As such, each quantum entity usually treated as a point particle may be represented by a deformable medium, the dynamic behavior of which is prescribed by four dynamic state variables, including mass density, velocity, internal pressure, and intrinsic angular momentum. In conjunction with the finding of the characteristic equation characterizing the physical nature of such media, it is found that a complex field quantity may be introduced to uncover a perhaps unexpected correlation, i.e., the governing dynamic equations for such media may be exactly reduced to the Schrödinger equation, from which the closed-form solutions for all the four dynamic state variables can be obtained. It turns out that this complex field quantity is just the wavefunction in the Schrödinger equation. Moreover, the dynamic effects peculiar to spin are derivable as direct consequences. It appears that these results provide a missing link in quantum theory, in the sense of disclosing the physical origin and nature of both the wavefunction and the wave equation. Now, the inherent indeterminacy in quantum theory may be rendered irrelevant. The consequences are explained for certain long-standing fundamental issues.

## Keywords

quantum entity deformable medium nonlinear dynamic equation new interpretation Schrödinger equation## Chinese Library Classification

O33 O413## 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification

74A99 81P05 81S99## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- [1]Mehra, J. and Rechnberg, H.
*The Historical Development of Quantum Theory I–VI*, Springer, Berlin (2000)Google Scholar - [2]Healey, R.
*The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - [3]Omnès, R.
*The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics*, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [4]Weinberg, S.
*Dreams of a Final Theory*, Vaintage, London (1994)Google Scholar - [5]Bohm, D. A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of hidden variables, I and II.
*Physical Review*,**85**, 166–193 (1952)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - [6]Bohm, D. and Hiley, B. J.
*The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics*, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1993)Google Scholar - [7]Valentini, A.
*Pilot-Wave Theory of Physics and Cosmology*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar - [8]Everett, H. III: relative state formulation of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics,
**29**, 459–462 (1957)Google Scholar - [9]DeWitt, B. S. and Graham, R. N.
*The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Prince-ton Series in Physics*, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1973)Google Scholar - [10]Deutsch, D.
*The Fabric of Reality*, Allen Lane, New York (1997)Google Scholar - [11]Ballentine, L. B.
*Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development*, World Scientific, Singapore (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - [12]Zeh, H. D, On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory.
*On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory***1**, 69–76 (1970)Google Scholar - [13]Zurek, W. H, Environment-induced superselection rules.
*Environment-induced superselection rules***26**, 1862–1880 (1982)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [14]Hartle, J. B, Spacetime coarse-grainings in non-reletivistic quantum mechanics.
*Spacetime coarse-grainings in non-reletivistic quantum mechanics***44**, 3173–3196 (1991)Google Scholar - [15]Gell-Mann, M.
*The Quarks and the Jaguar*, Freeman, New York (1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [16]Gell-Mann, M. and Hartle, J. B, Classical equations for quantum systems.
*Classical equations for quantum systems***47**, 3345–3382 (1993)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - [17]Griffiths, R. B.
*Consistent Quantum Theory*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar - [18]Schlosshauer, M, Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics.
*Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics***76**, 1267–1305 (2005)Google Scholar - [19]Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., and Weber, T, Unified dynamics for subatomic and macroscopic systems.
*Unified dynamics for subatomic and macroscopic systems***34**, 470–489 (1986)zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [20]Bassi, A. and Ghirardi, G. C, Dynamic reduction models.
*Dynamic reduction models***379**, 257–426 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [21]Crane, L. Clock and catogary: is quantum gravity algebraic?
*Journal of Mathematical Physics*,**36**, 6180–6193 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - [22]Penrose, R, Quantum computation, entanglement and state reduction.
*Quantum computation, entanglement and state reduction***356**, 1927–1939 (1998)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar - [23]Penrose, R.
*The Emporor’s New Mind*, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar - [24]T’Hooft, G. A mathematical theory for deterministic quantum mechanics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 67, 012015 (2007)Google Scholar
- [25]Feynman, R. P.
*The Character of Physical Law*, MIT Press, Cambridge (1967)Google Scholar - [26]Smolin, L.
*The Trouble with Physics*, Spin Networks, Ltd., New York (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [27]Dirac, P. A. M.
*The Principles of Quantum Mechanics*, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1958)zbMATHGoogle Scholar - [28]Griffiths, D. J.
*Introduction to Quantum Mechanics*, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2005)Google Scholar