Abstract
There have already been several interface models for the analyses of thin interfacial layers in bonded materials. To distinguish their corresponding advantages or limitations, a comparative study is carried out, and a new constitutive-based interface model is proposed. Through numerical examinations, the limitations of typical models are clarified. It is found that the new interface model is an efficient and accurate model, by which both the traction and the displacement jumps across the modelled interface with the thickness of zero are allowed, and the stresses within the interfacial layer can also be analyzed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rizzoni, R., Dumont, S., Lebon, F., and Sacco, E, Higher order model for soft and hard elastic interfaces. Higher order model for soft and hard elastic interfaces 51, 4137–4148 (2014)
Lebon, F. and Rizzoni, R, Asymptotic analysis of a thin interface: the case involving similar rigidity. Asymptotic analysis of a thin interface: the case involving similar rigidity 48, 473–486 (2010)
Lebon, F., Khaoua, A. O., and Licht, C, Numerical study of soft adhesively bonded joints in finite elasticity. Numerical study of soft adhesively bonded joints in finite elasticity 21, 134–140 (1998)
Dundurs, J. Micromechanics and Inhomogeneity, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 109–114 (1990)
Xu, J. Q. The Mechanics of Interface (in Chinese), Science Publication, Beijing (2006)
Benveniste, Y. A general interface model for a three-dimensional curved thin anisotropic interphase between two anisotropic media. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 54, 708–734 (2006)
Corigliano, A, Formulation, identification and use of interface models in the numerical analysis of composite delamination. Formulation, identification and use of interface models in the numerical analysis of composite delamination 30, 2779–2811 (1993)
Benveniste, Y. and Miloh, T, Imperfect soft and stiff interfaces in two-dimensional elasticity. Imperfect soft and stiff interfaces in two-dimensional elasticity 33, 309–323 (2001)
Elices, M., Guinea, G. V., Gomez, J., and Planas, J, The cohesive zone model: advantages, limitations and challenges. The cohesive zone model: advantages, limitations and challenges 69, 137–163 (2002)
Valoroso, N., Sessa, S., Lepore, M., and Cricri, G, Identification of mode-I cohesive parameters for bonded interfaces based on DCB test. Identification of mode-I cohesive parameters for bonded interfaces based on DCB test 104, 56–79 (2013)
Özdemir, I., Brekelmans, W. A. M., and Geers, M. G. D. A thermo-mechanical cohesive zone model. #, 46, 735–745 (2010)
Rabinovitch, O, An extended high-order cohesive interface approach to the debonding analysis of FRP strengthened beams. An extended high-order cohesive interface approach to the debonding analysis of FRP strengthened beams 81, 1–16 (2014)
Cai, X. J. and Xu, J. Q, Interfacial fracture criteria based on the nominal deformation energy of interface. Interfacial fracture criteria based on the nominal deformation energy of interface 75, 16–21 (2014)
Yuuki, R. and Kisu, H. Elastic Analysis Based on Boundary Element Analysis, Baifukan, Tokyo (1987)
Bogy, D. B, Edge-bonded dissimilar orthogonal elastic wedges under normal and shear loading. Edge-bonded dissimilar orthogonal elastic wedges under normal and shear loading 35, 460–466 (1968)
Yuuki, R. and Xu, J. Q, Boundary element analysis of dissimilar materials and interface crack. Boundary element analysis of dissimilar materials and interface crack 14, 116–127 (1994)
Xu, J. Q., Fu, L. D., and Mutoh, Y. A method for determining elastic-plastic stress singularity at the interface edge of bonded power law hardening materials. JSME International Journal Series A, 45, 177–183 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 10632040)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cai, X., Xu, J. Interface models for thin interfacial layers. Appl. Math. Mech.-Engl. Ed. 37, 707–724 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10483-016-2084-6
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10483-016-2084-6