Numerical investigation of dual-porosity model with transient transfer function based on discrete-fracture model
- 144 Downloads
Based on the characteristics of fractures in naturally fractured reservoir and a discrete-fracture model, a fracture network numerical well test model is developed. Bottom hole pressure response curves and the pressure field are obtained by solving the model equations with the finite-element method. By analyzing bottom hole pressure curves and the fluid flow in the pressure field, seven flow stages can be recognized on the curves. An upscaling method is developed to compare with the dual-porosity model (DPM). The comparisons results show that the DPM overestimates the inter-porosity coefficient λ and the storage factor ω. The analysis results show that fracture conductivity plays a leading role in the fluid flow. Matrix permeability influences the beginning time of flow from the matrix to fractures. Fractures density is another important parameter controlling the flow. The fracture linear flow is hidden under the large fracture density. The pressure propagation is slower in the direction of larger fracture density.
Key wordsdual-porosity model (DPM) discrete-fracture model fracture network finite-element method upscaling numerical well test
Chinese Library ClassificationO242.21 O357.3
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification76S05 74S05
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Coats, K. H. Implicit compositional simulation of single-porosity and dual porosity reservoirs. SPE Symposium on Reservoir Simulation, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Houston (1989)Google Scholar
- Ueda, Y., Murata, S., Watanabe, Y., and Fanatsu, K. Investigation of the shape factor used in the dual-porosity reservoir simulator. SPE Asia-Pacific Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Sydney (1989)Google Scholar
- Chang, M. M. Analytical Solution to Single and Two-Phase Flow Problems of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs: Theoretical Shape Factor and Transfer Functions, Ph. D. dissertation, University of Tulsa (1995)Google Scholar
- Kim, J. G. and Deo, M. D. Comparison of the performance of a discrete fracture multiphase model with those using conventional methods. SPE Symposium on Reservoir Simulation, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Houston (1999)Google Scholar
- Hoteit, H. and Firoozabadi, A. Compositional modeling by the combined discontinuous Galerkin and mixed methods. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 11(1), 19–24 (2006)Google Scholar
- Zhang, D. M., Cai, C. X., Zhang, K. B., Zhan, J. M., and Huang, H. Computational Fluid Mechanics (in Chinese), Sun Yat-sen University Press, Guangzhou (1991)Google Scholar
- Cinco-Ley, H. and Samaniego-V, F. Fractured reservoir simulation. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 33(09), 1749–1766 (1981)Google Scholar
- Bourdet, D. Well Test Analysis: The Use of Advanced Interpretation Models, Elsevier, Amaterdam, 63–65 (2002)Google Scholar