Advertisement

Applied Mathematics and Mechanics

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 229–238 | Cite as

Dynamic behavior of frozen soil under uniaxial strain and stress conditions

  • Hai-dong Zhang (张海东)
  • Zhi-wu Zhu (朱志武)Email author
  • Shun-cheng Song (宋顺成)
  • Guo-zheng Kang (康国政)
  • Jian-guo Ning (宁建国)
Article

Abstract

The split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) method is used to investigate the dynamic behavior of the artificial frozen soil under the nearly uniaxial strain and uniaxial stress conditions. The tests are conducted at the temperatures of −3°C, −8°C, −13°C, −17°C, −23°C, and −28°C and with the strain rates from 900 s−1 to 1 500 s−1. The nearly uniaxial stress-strain curves exhibit an elastic-plastic behavior, whereas the uniaxial stress-strain curves show a brittle behavior. The compressive strength of the frozen soil exhibits the positive strain rate and negative temperature sensitivity, and the final strain of the frozen soil shows the positive strain rate sensitivity. The strength of the frozen soil under the nearly uniaxial strain is greater than that under the uniaxial stress. After the negative confinement tests, the specimens are compressed, and the visible cracks are not observed. However, the specimens are catastrophically damaged after the uniaxial SHPB tests. A phenomenological model with the thermal sensitivity is established to describe the dynamic behavior of the confined frozen soil.

Key words

frozen soil dynamic loading split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) confinement high strain rate 

Chinese Library Classification

O347 P642 

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification

74L10 76L05 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Xu, X. Z., Wang, C. J., and Zhang, L. X. Physics of Frozen Soil (in Chinese), Science Press, Beijing (1997)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Zhao, S. P., Zhu, Y. L., He, P., and Yang, C. S. Recent progress and suggestion in the research on dynamic response of frozen soil (in Chinese). Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 24(5), 681–686 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Ma, Q. Y. Research status of dynamic properties of artificial frozen soil and its significance (in Chinese). Rock and Soil Mechanics, 30(supp.), 10–14 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Martin, B. E., Chen, W., and Song, B. Moisture effects on the high strain-rate behavior of sand. Mechanics of Materials, 41(6), 786–798 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Song, B., Chen, W. N., and Luk, V. Impact compressive response of dry sand. Mechanics of Materials, 41(6), 777–785 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Furish, M. D. Measuring Static and Dynamic Properties of Frozen Silty Soils, Sandia Report, 98-1479, Livermore, California, U.S.A. (1998)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Lee, M. Y., Fossum, A., and Costin, L. S. Frozen Soil Material Testing and Constitutive Modeling, Sandia Report, 2002-0524, Livermore, California, U.S.A. (2002)Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Ma, Q. Y. Experimental analysis of dynamic mechanical properties for artificially frozen clay by the split Hopkinson pressure bar. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 51(3), 448–452 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Kolsky, H. An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading. Proc. Phys. Soc. B, 62(11), 676–700 (1949)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Gao, W. J., Shan, R. L., Wang, G. C., and Cheng, R. Q. Constitutive relation of Yunjialing anthracite under medium strain rate. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 17(1), 126–132 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Zhu, Z. W., Ning, J. G., and Liu, X. Dynamic mechanical behavior of soil under impact load (in Chinese), Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 25(5), 444–450 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Shazly, M., Prakash, V., and Lerch, B. A. Confinement effects on the dynamic compressive properties of an epoxy syntactic foam. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 46(6), 1499–1515 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Song, B., Chen, W. N., Yanagita, T., and Frew, D. J. Confinement effects on the dynamic compressive properties of an epoxy syntactic foam. Composite Structures, 67(3), 279–287 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Warren, T. L. and Forrestal, M. J. Effects of strain hardening and strain-rate sensitivity on the penetration of aluminum targets with spherical-nosed rods. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 35(28–29), 3737–3753 (1998)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hai-dong Zhang (张海东)
    • 1
  • Zhi-wu Zhu (朱志武)
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Shun-cheng Song (宋顺成)
    • 1
  • Guo-zheng Kang (康国政)
    • 1
  • Jian-guo Ning (宁建国)
    • 3
  1. 1.Traction Power State Key LaboratorySouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduP. R. China
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research InstituteChinese Academic SciencesLanzhouP. R. China
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and TechnologyBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingP. R. China

Personalised recommendations