Metschnikowia mating genomics
- 134 Downloads
Genes involved in mating type determination and recognition were examined in Metschnikowia and related species, to gather insights on factors affecting mating compatibility patterns among haplontic, heterothallic yeast species of the genus. We confirmed the universality of the special mating locus organisation found in Clavispora lusitaniae across and exclusive to the family Metschnikowiaceae (i.e., Metschnikowia and Clavispora). Timing of the divergence between idiomorphs was confirmed to coincide with the origin of the larger (CUG-ser) clade comprising the Debaryomycetaceae and the Metschnikowiaceae, exclusive of Cephaloascus fragrans. The sequence of the a mating pheromone is highly conserved within the large-spored Metschnikowia species, including Metschnikowia orientalis and Metschnikowia hawaiiana, but not Metschnikowia drosophilae or Metschnikowia torresii, which have a pattern of their own, as do other clades in the genus. In contrast, variation in α pheromones shows a more continuous, although imperfect correlation with phylogenetic distance as well as with in vivo mating compatibility.
KeywordsYeast Metschnikowia Metschnikowiaceae Mating type locus Mating pheromones
Funding from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are extended to K. Bensch for her assistance in obtaining the MycoBank numbers and to A. Spera for early contributions to exploration of the mating type locus.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bennett RJ, Turgeon BG (2016) Fungal sex: the ascomycota. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0005-2016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guzmán B, Lachance MA, Herrera CM (2013) Phylogenetic analysis of the angiosperm-floricolous insect-yeast association: have yeast and angiosperm lineages co-diversified? Mol Phlogenet Evol 68:61–175Google Scholar
- Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A (2012) Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lachance MA (2012) In defense of yeast sexual life cycles: the forma asexualis, an informal proposal. Yeast Newsl 61:24–25Google Scholar
- Lachance MA, Bowles JM (2004) Metschnikowia similis sp. nov. and Metschnikowia colocasiae sp. nov., two ascomycetous yeasts isolated from Conotelus spp. (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) in Costa Rica. Stud Mycol 50:69–76Google Scholar
- Marinoni G (2003) Sexual cycle and speciation in the giant-spored Metschnikowia species. Dissertation, University of Western OntarioGoogle Scholar
- McNeill J, Barrie FR, Buck WR, Demoulin V, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Marhold K et al (2012) International code of nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code). Regnum Veg 154. ARG Gantner Verlag, KoenigsteinGoogle Scholar
- Riley R, Haridas S, Wolfe KH, Lopes MR, Hittinger CT, Göker M, Salamov AA, Wisecaver JH, Long TM, Calvey CH, Aerts AL, Barry KW, Choi C, Clum A, Coughlan AY, Deshpande S, Douglass AP, Hanson SJ, Klenk HP, LaButti KM, Lapidus A, Lindquist EA, Lipzen AM, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Ohm RA, Otillar RP, Pangilinan JL, Peng Y, Rokas A, Rosa CA, Scheuner C, Sibirny AA, Slot JC, Stielow JB, Sun H, Kurtzman CP, Blackwell M, Grigoriev IV, Jeffries TW (2016) Comparative genomics of biotechnologically important yeasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:9882–9887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Robles LM, Millan-Pacheco C, Pastor N, Del Rio G (2017) Structure-function studies of the alpha pheromone receptor from yeast. Rev Esp Cienc Quim Biol 20:16–26Google Scholar
- Umanah GKE, Huang L, Ding F, Arshava B, Farley AR, Link AJ, Naider F, Becker JM (2010) Identification of residue to residue contact between a peptide ligand and its G protein-coupled receptor using periodate-mediated dihydroxyphenylalanine cross-linking and mass spectrometry. J Biol Chem 285:39425–39436CrossRefGoogle Scholar