DEA under big data: data enabled analytics and network data envelopment analysis

Abstract

This paper proposes that data envelopment analysis (DEA) should be viewed as a method (or tool) for data-oriented analytics in performance evaluation and benchmarking. While computational algorithms have been developed to deal with large volumes of data (decision making units, inputs, and outputs) under the conventional DEA, valuable information hidden in big data that are represented by network structures should be extracted by DEA. These network structures, e.g., transportation and logistics systems, encompass a broader range of inter-linked metrics that cannot be modelled by conventional DEA. It is proposed that network DEA is related to the value dimension of big data. It is shown that network DEA is different from standard DEA, although it bears the name of DEA and some similarity with conventional DEA. Network DEA is big data enabled analytics (big DEA) when multiple (performance) metrics or attributes are linked through network structures. These network structures are too large or complex to be dealt with by conventional DEA. Unlike conventional DEA that are solved via linear programming, general network DEA corresponds to nonconvex optimization problems. This represents opportunities for developing techniques for solving non-linear network DEA models. Areas such as transportation and logistics system as well as supply chains have a great potential to use network DEA in big data modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Afsharian, M. (2019). A frontier-based facility location problem with a centralized view of measuring the performance of the network. Journal of the Operational Research Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1639476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amirteimoori, A., Kordrostami, S., & Azizi, H. (2016). Additive models for network data envelopment analysis in the presence of shared resources. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,48, 411–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. An, Q. X., We, Y., Xiong, B. B., Yang, M., & Chen, X. H. (2017). Allocation of carbon dioxide emission permits with the minimum cost for Chinese provinces in big data environment. Journal of Cleaner Production,142, 886–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aparicio, J., Pastor, J. T., Vidal, F., & Zofío, J. L. (2017). Evaluating productive performance: A new approach based on the product-mix problem consistent with Data envelopment analysis. OMEGA,67, 134–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Azadi, M., Shabani, A., Khodakarami, M., & Saen, R. F. (2015). Reprint of “Planning in feasible region by two-stage target-setting DEA methods: An application in green supply chain management of public transportation service providers”. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,74, 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Badiezadeh, T., Saen, R. F., & Samavati, T. (2018). Assessing sustainability of supply chains by double frontier network DEA: A big data approach. Computers & Operations Research,98, 284–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang, Y. C., & Yu, M. M. (2014). Measuring production and consumption efficiencies using the slack-based measure network data envelopment analysis approach: The case of low-cost carriers. Journal of Advanced Transportation,48(1), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang, Y. T., Park, H. K., Zou, B., & Kafle, N. (2016). Passenger facility charge versus airport improvement program funds: A dynamic network DEA analysis for US airport financing. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,88, 76–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chao, S. L. (2017). Integrating multi-stage data envelopment analysis and a fuzzy analytical hierarchical process to evaluate the efficiency of major global liner shipping companies. Maritime Policy & Management,44(4), 496–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chao, S. L., Yu, M. M., & Hsieh, W. F. (2018). Evaluating the efficiency of major container shipping companies: A framework of dynamic network DEA with shared inputs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,117, 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Charles, V., Aparicio, J., & Zhu, J. (2019). The curse of dimensionality of decision-making units: A simple approach to increase the discriminatory power of data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research,279(3), 929–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Charles, V., Aparicio, J., & Zhu, J. (2020a). Data science for better productivity. Journal of the Operational Research Society. (in press).

  13. Charles, V., Aparicio, J., & Zhu, J. (Eds.). (2020b). Preface. In Data science and productivity analytics. New York: Springer.

  14. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the inefficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research,2(6), 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, C., & Lam, J. S. L. (2018). Sustainability and interactivity between cities and ports: A two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Maritime Policy & Management,45, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, C.-M. (2009). A network-DEA model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production networks. European Journal of Operational Research,194, 687–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, K., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2020). A conic relaxation model for searching global optimum of network data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research,280(1), 242–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, K., & Zhu, J. (2017). Second order cone programming approach to two-stage network data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research,262, 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, K., & Zhu, J. (2020). Additive slacks-based measure: Computational strategy and extension to network DEA. OMEGA,91, 102022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, L., & Jia, G. Z. (2017). Environmental efficiency analysis of China’s regional industry: A data envelopment analysis (DEA) based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production,142, 846–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, P.-C., Yu, M.-M., Shih, J.-C., Chang, C.-C., & Hsu, S.-H. (2019a). A reassessment of the global food security index by using a hierarchical data envelopment analysis approach. European Journal of Operational Research,272, 687–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Li, N., & Zhu, J. (2009). Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196, 1170–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Kao, C., & Zhu, J. (2013). Network DEA pitfalls: Divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures. European Journal of Operational Research,226(3), 507–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., & Lim, S. (2019b). Preface: DEA and its applications in operations and data analytics. Annals of Operations Research,278(1–2), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chou, H. W., Lee, C. Y., Chen, H. K., & Tsai, M. Y. (2016). Evaluating airlines with slack-based measures and meta-frontiers. Journal of Advanced Transportation,50(6), 1061–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chu, J. F., Wu, J., & Song, M. L. (2018). An SBM-DEA model with parallel computing design for environmental efficiency evaluation in the big data context: A transportation system application. Annals of Operations Research,270(1–2), 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cook, W. D., Chai, D., Doyle, J., & Green, R. (1998). Hierarchies and groups in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis,10(2), 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cook, W. D., & Green, R. H. (2005). Evaluating power plant efficiency: A hierarchical model. Computers & Operations Research,32(4), 813–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cook, W. D., Harrison, J., Imanirad, R., Rouse, P., & Zhu, J. (2013). Data envelopment analysis with non-homogeneous DMUs. Operations Research,61(3), 666–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cook, W. D., Liang, L., & Zhu, J. (2010a). Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective. OMEGA,38, 423–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cook, W. D., Ramón, N., Ruiz, J. L., Sirvent, I., & Zhu, J. (2019). DEA-based benchmarking for performance evaluation in pay-for-performance incentive plans. OMEGA,84, 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cook, W. D., & Seiford, L. M. (2009). Data envelopment analysis (DEA)—30 years on. European Journal of Operational Research,192(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cook, W. D., Tone, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. OMEGA,44, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cook, W. D., Zhu, J., Bi, G.-B., & Yang, F. (2010b). Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research,207(2), 1122–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2004). Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cui, Q., & Li, Y. (2016). Airline energy efficiency measures considering carbon abatement: A new strategic framework. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,49, 246–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cui, Q., & Li, Y. (2017). Airline efficiency measures using a dynamic epsilon-based measure model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,100, 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cui, Q., & Li, Y. (2018). CNG2020 strategy and airline efficiency: A network epsilon-based measure with managerial disposability. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation,12(5), 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cui, Q., Li, Y., & Lin, J. L. (2018). Pollution abatement costs change decomposition for airlines: An analysis from a dynamic perspective. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,111, 96–107.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cui, Q., Li, Y., & Wei, Y. M. (2017). Exploring the impacts of EU ETS on the pollution abatement costs of European airlines: An application of network environmental production function. Transport Policy,60, 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cui, Q., Wei, Y. M., Yu, C. L., & Li, Y. (2016). Measuring the energy efficiency for airlines under the pressure of being included into the EU ETS. Journal of Advanced Transportation,50(8), 1630–1649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Díaz-Hernández, J. J., Martínez-Budría, E., & Salazar-González, J. J. (2014). Measuring cost efficiency in the presence of quasi-fixed inputs using dynamic data envelopment analysis: The case of port infrastructure. Maritime Economics & Logistics,16(2), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,34, 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gan, G., Lee, H.-S., Lee, L., Wang, X., & Wang, Q. (2019). Network hierarchical DEA with an application to international shipping industry in Taiwan. Journal of the Operational Research Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1603792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gong, B. G., Guo, D. D., Zhang, X. Q., & Cheng, J. S. (2017). An approach for evaluating cleaner production performance in iron and steel enterprises involving competitive relationships. Journal of Cleaner Production,142, 739–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Halická, M., & Trnovská, M. (2018). The Russell measure model: Computational aspects, duality, and profit efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research,268, 386–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Herranz, R. E., Estevez, P. G., Oliva, M., & De, R. (2017). Leveraging financial management performance of the Spanish aerospace manufacturing value chain. Journal of Business Economics and Management,18(5), 1005–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ihrig, S., Ishizaka, A., Brech, C., & Fliedner, T. (2019). A new hybrid method for the fair assignment of productivity targets to indirect corporate processes. Journal of the Operational Research Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1639477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Izadikhah, M., & Saen, R. F. (2016). Evaluating sustainability of supply chains by two-stage range directional measure in the presence of negative data. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,49, 110–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ji, X., Sun, J. S., Wang, Y. Y., & Yuan, Q. Q. (2017). Allocation of emission permits in large data sets: A robust multi-criteria approach. Journal of Cleaner Production,142, 894–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kahi, V. S., Yousefi, S., Shabanpour, H., & Saen, R. F. (2017). How to evaluate sustainability of supply chains? A dynamic network DEA approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems,117(9), 1866–1889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kao, C. (1998). Measuring the efficiency of forest districts with multiple working circles. Journal of the Operational Research Society,49(6), 583–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kao, C. (2009). Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model. European Journal of Operational Research,192(3), 949–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kao, C. (2014). Network data envelopment analysis: A review. European Journal of Operational Research,239, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kao, C. (2015). Efficiency measurement for hierarchical network systems. Omega,51, 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kao, C. (2018). A classification of slacks-based efficiency measures in network data envelopment analysis with an analysis of the properties possessed. European Journal of Operational Research,270(3), 1109–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kao, C., & Hwang, S. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 418–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Khezrimotlagh, D., Zhu, J., Cook, W., & Toloo, M. (2019). Data envelopment analysis and big data. European Journal of Operational Research,274(3), 1047–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kottas, A. T., & Madas, M. A. (2018). Comparative efficiency analysis of major international airlines using data envelopment analysis: Exploring effects of alliance membership and other operational efficiency determinants. Journal of Air Transport Management,70, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kuo, Y.-H., & Kusiak, A. (2019). From data to big data in production research: The past and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15–16), 4828–4853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Lahdelma, R., & Salminen, K. (2006). Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis using the data envelopment model. European Journal of Operational Research,170, 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Li, L., Hao, T. T., & Chi, T. (2017). Evaluation on China’s forestry resources efficiency based on big data. Journal of Cleaner Production,142, 513–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Li, W. H., Liang, L., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2016). DEA models for non-homogeneous DMUs with different input configurations. European Journal of Operational Research,254, 946–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Li, Y., Wang, Y. Z., & Cui, Q. (2015). Evaluating airline efficiency: An application of virtual frontier network SBM. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,81, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Liang, L., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008). DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics, 55(7), 643–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Liang, L., Yang, F., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2006). DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Annals of Operations Research,145(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Lim, S., & Zhu, J. (2017). DEA and its applications in operations—Part I. INFOR,55(3), 159–273.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Lim, S., & Zhu, J. (2018). DEA and its applications in operations—Part II. INFOR,56(3), 265–359.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Lim, S., & Zhu, J. (2019). Primal–dual correspondence and frontier projections in two-stage network DEA models. OMEGA,83, 236–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Liu, D. (2017). Evaluating the multi-period efficiency of East Asia airport companies. Journal of Air Transport Management,59, 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., & Lu, W. (2016). Research fronts and prevailing applications in data envelopment analysis. In J. Zhu (Ed.), Data envelopment analysis (pp. 543–574). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., Lu, W., & Lin, B. J. (2013a). A survey of DEA applications. Omega,41(5), 893–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., Lu, W., & Lin, B. J. (2013b). Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega,41(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Liu, X. H., Chu, J. F., Yin, P. Z., & Sun, J. S. (2017). DEA cross-efficiency evaluation considering undesirable output and ranking priority: A case study of eco-efficiency analysis of coal-fired power plants. Journal of Cleaner Production,142, 877–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Lozano, S., & Gutiérrez, E. (2014). A slacks-based network DEA efficiency analysis of European airlines. Transportation Planning and Technology,37(7), 623–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Mahajan, J. (1991). A data envelopment analytic model for assessing the relative efficiency of the selling function. European Journal of Operational Research,53(2), 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Mahdiloo, M., Jafarzadeh, A. H., Saen, R. F., Tatham, P., & Fisher, R. (2016). A multiple criteria approach to two-stage data envelopment analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,46, 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Mallikarjun, S. (2015). Efficiency of US airlines: A strategic operating model. Journal of Air Transport Management,43, 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Misiunas, N., Oztekin, A., Chen, Y., & Chandra, K. (2016). DEANN: A healthcare analytic methodology of data envelopment analysis and artificial neural networks for the prediction of organ recipient functional status. OMEGA,58(2016), 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Olesen, O. B., Petersen, N. C., & Podinovski, V. V. (2015). Efficiency analysis with ratio measures. European Journal of Operational Research,245(2), 446–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Olfat, L., Amiri, M., Soufi, J. B., & Pishdar, M. (2016). A dynamic network efficiency measurement of airports performance considering sustainable development concept: A fuzzy dynamic network-DEA approach. Journal of Air Transport Management,57, 272–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Omrani, H., & Keshavarz, M. (2016). A performance evaluation model for supply chain of shipping company in Iran: An application of the relational network DEA. Maritime Policy & Management,43(1), 121–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Omrani, H., & Soltanzadeh, E. (2016). Dynamic DEA models with network structure: An application for Iranian airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management,57, 52–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Shao, Y., & Sun, C. (2016). Performance evaluation of China’s air routes based on network data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Air Transport Management,55, 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Shen, Y., Hermans, E., Brijs, T., Wets, G., & Vanhoof, K. (2012). Road safety risk evaluation and target setting using data envelopment analysis and its extensions. Accident Analysis and Prevention,48, 430–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Shwartz, M., Burgess, J. F., Jr., & Zhu, J. (2016). A DEA based composite measure of quality and its associated data uncertainty interval for health care provider profiling and pay-for-performance. European Journal of Operational Research,253(2), 489–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Song, M. L., Cen, L., Zheng, Z. X., Fisher, R., Liang, X., Wang, Y. T., et al. (2017). How would big data support societal development and environmental sustainability? Insights and practices. Journal of Cleaner Production,142, 489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Song, M. L., Fisher, R., Wang, J. L., & Cui, L. B. (2018). Environmental performance evaluation with big data: Theories and methods. Annals of Operations Research,270(1–2), 459–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Song, M. L., & Wang, S. H. (2017). Participation in global value chain and green technology progress: Evidence from big data of Chinese enterprises. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,24(2), 1648–1661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Storto, C. L. (2018). The analysis of the cost-revenue production cycle efficiency of the Italian airports: A NSBM DEA approach. Journal of Air Transport Management,72, 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Summerfield, N., Deoka, A., Xu, M., & Zhu, W. W. (2019). Should driver cooperate? Performance evaluation of cooperative navigation on simulated road networks using network DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1700766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Sun, Y. X., Yu, X. B., Tan, Z. F., Xu, X. F., & Yan, Q. Y. (2017). Efficiency evaluation of operation analysis systems based on dynamic data envelope analysis models from a big data perspective. Applied Sciences-Basel,7(6), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Tavassoli, M., Faramarzi, G. R., & Saen, R. F. (2014). Efficiency and effectiveness in airline performance using a SBM-NDEA model in the presence of shared input. Journal of Air Transport Management,34, 146–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research,197(1), 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2014). Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure approach. OMEGA,42, 124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Wu, Y. M., Chen, Z. X., & Xia, P. P. (2018). An extended DEA-based measurement for eco-efficiency from the viewpoint of limited preparation. Journal of Cleaner Production,195, 721–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Yang, C. L., Yuan, B. J. C., Huang, C. Y., & Chang, C. N. (2015). Evaluating the performance of disaster recovery systemic innovations by using the data envelopment analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship,9(2), 51–75.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Yu, M. M., & Chen, L. H. (2016). Centralized resource allocation with emission resistance in a two-stage production system: Evidence from a Taiwan’s container shipping company. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,94, 650–671.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Yu, M. M., Chen, L. H., & Chiang, H. (2017). The effects of alliances and size on airlines’ dynamic operational performance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,106, 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Zhang, W., Pan, X. F., Yan, Y. B., & Pan, X. Y. (2017). Convergence analysis of regional energy efficiency in China based on large-dimensional panel data model. Journal of Cleaner Production,142, 801–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Zhu, J. (2011). Airlines performance via two-stage network DEA approach. Journal of CENTRUM Cathedra,4(2), 260–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Zhu, J. (2013). Efficiency evaluation with strong ordinal input and output measures. European Journal of Operational Research,146(3), 477–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Zhu, Q., Wu, J., & Song, M. (2018). Efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis in the big data context. Computers & Operations Research,98, 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Zhu, Q. Y., Wu, J., Li, X. C., & Xiong, B. B. (2017). China’s regional natural resource allocation and utilization: A DEA-based approach in a big data environment. Journal of Cleaner Production,142, 809–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive suggestions and comments on an earlier version of the paper. Earlier versions of the paper were presented at the Data Envelopment Analysis International Conference (June 28–30, 2019, Canterbury, UK) and the 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Transportation and Logistics with Big Data and the 7th International Forum on Decision Sciences, July 26–29, 2019, Windsor, Canada. The author is grateful for the comments and suggestions provided by the conference participants.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joe Zhu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Network DEA applications in air transportation, sea transportation, and supply chains

Appendix: Network DEA applications in air transportation, sea transportation, and supply chains

See Tables 3, 4 and 5.

Table 3 Network DEA measures in air transportation studies
Table 4 Network DEA measures in sea transportation studies
Table 5 Network DEA measures in supply chain studies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, J. DEA under big data: data enabled analytics and network data envelopment analysis. Ann Oper Res (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03668-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Data envelopment analysis (DEA)
  • Data enabled analytics
  • Big data
  • Performance
  • Productivity
  • Efficiency
  • Composite index
  • Transportation