Advertisement

Postponed two-pricing and ordering opportunity for selling a single season inventoried product

  • Avi Herbon
  • Matan Shnaiderman
  • Tatyana Chernonog
Original Research
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

Postponement strategies are becoming increasingly important in light of a global trend in which products’ life-cycles are decreasing, such that even products that are not traditionally considered seasonal become “obsolete” within a short period of time (e.g., electronic devices, new cars). Our work addresses postponed-pricing and ordering decisions for a retailer who sells a newsvendor-type inventoried product, in a selling season that is divided into two sub-periods. The division of the selling season enables the retailer to on-line adjust her decisions when faced with a scenario (one that is highly prevalent in reality) in which potential demand changes (increases or decreases) following consumers’ experiences of the product in early stages of the selling season. We assume that the retailer has two opportunities for receiving shipments: prior to the first sub-period and prior to the second one. The retailer determines each order quantity (base-stock level) on the basis of the demand distribution for the corresponding sub-period. In each sub-period, after observing additional market signals, the retailer determines the price of the product for that sub-period. With the aid of a stochastic programming approach, we develop optimization problems and solution methods in order to obtain pricing and ordering decisions that maximize the expected profit of the retailer. We present an extensive numerical example that compares the suggested strategy to three alternative strategies, and conclude that price postponement and responsiveness to demand changes can each reduce leftovers and lost sales as well as substantially increase expected profit.

Keywords

Revenue management Newsvendor problem Price postponement Stochastic programming Two-opportunity ordering and pricing problem 

References

  1. Aviv, Y., & Federgruen, A. (2001). Design for postponement: A comprehensive characterization of its benefits under unknown demand distributions. Operations Research, 49(4), 578–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cachon, G. P., & Kok, A. G. (2007). Implementation of the newsvendor model with clearance pricing. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 9(3), 276–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan, L. M. A., Shen, Z. J., Simchi-Levi, D., & Swann, J. L. (2004). Coordination of pricing and inventory decisions: A survey and classification. In D. Simchi-Levi, S. D. Wu, & Z. J. Shen (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis: Modeling in the e-business era (pp. 335–392). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chernonog, T., & Kogan, K. (2014). The effect of risk aversion on a supply chain with postponed pricing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(9), 1396–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dantzig, G. B., & Infanger, G. (1993). Multi-stage stochastic linear programs for portfolio optimization. Annals of Operations Research, 45, 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Du, S., Ma, F., Fu, Z., Zhu, L., & Zhang, J. (2015). Game-theoretic analysis for an emission-dependent supply chain in a ‘cap-and-trade’ system. Annals of Operations Research, 228(1), 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feitzinger, E., & Lee, H. (1997). Mass customization at Hewlett Packard: The power of postponement. Harvard Business Review, 75, 116–121.Google Scholar
  8. Ferdows, K., Lewis, M. A., & Machuca, J. A. D. (2004). Rapid fire fulfillment. Harvard Business Review, 82(11), 104–110.Google Scholar
  9. Fisher, M., Raman, A., & McClelland, A. (2000). Rocket science retailing is almost here—Are you ready? Harvard Business Review, 78(4), 115–124.Google Scholar
  10. Gerchak, Y. (2012). Postponed holdback pricing, profit and consumer surplus. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 29(1), 1240007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herbon, A. (2014). Dynamic pricing versus acquiring information on consumers’ heterogeneous sensitivity to product freshness. International Journal of Production Research, 52(3), 918–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herbon, A., & Kogan, K. (2014). Time-dependent and independent control rules for coordinated production and pricing under demand uncertainty and finite planning horizons. Annals of Operations Research, 1, 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kek, A. G. H., Cheu, R. L., Meng, Q., & Fung, C. H. (2009). A decision support system for vehicle relocation operations in carsharing systems. Transaction Research, E45, 149–158.Google Scholar
  14. Khmelnitsky, E., & Singer, G. (2015). An optimal inventory management problem with reputation-dependent demand. Annals of Operations Research, 231(1), 317–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Khouja, M. (1999). The single-period (news-vendor) problem: Literature review and suggestions for future research. Omega, 27(5), 537–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, H. L. (1996). Effective inventory and service management through product and process redesign. Operations Research, 44(1), 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., Taylor, T. A., & Whang, S. (2000). Price protection in the personal computer industry. Management Science, 46(4), 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Linh, C. T., & Hong, Y. (2009). Channel coordination through a revenue sharing contract in a two-period newsboy problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 198(3), 822–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Padmanabhan, V., & Png, I. P. L. (1997). Manufacturer’s return policies and retail competition. Marketing Science, 16(1), 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Petruzzi, N. C., & Dada, M. (1999). Pricing and the newsvendor problem: A review with extensions. Operation Research, 47(2), 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Petruzzi, N. C., & Dada, M. (2001). Information and inventory recourse for a two-market, price-setting retailer. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 3(3), 242–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Qin, Y., Wang, R., Vakharia, A. J., Chen, Y., & Seref, M. M. H. (2011). The newsvendor problem: Review and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 213(2), 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sethi, S. P., Yan, H., Zhang, H., & Zhou, J. (2007). A supply chain with a service requirement for each market signal. Production and Operations Management, 16, 322–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shapiro, A., Dentcheva, D., & Ruszczyński, A. P. (2009). Lectures on stochastic programming: Modeling and theory. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial Mathematics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tang, C., & Tomlin, B. (2008). The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(1), 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Van Hoek, R. I. (2001). The rediscovery of postponement a literature review and directions for research. Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), 161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Mieghem, J., & Dada, M. (1999). Price versus production postponement: Capacity and competition. Management Science, 45(12), 1631–1649.Google Scholar
  28. You, P. S. (2005). Inventory policy for products with price and time-dependent demands. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56, 870–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. You, P. S. (2006). Ordering and pricing of service products in an advance sales system with price-dependent demand. European Journal of Operational Research, 170, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Avi Herbon
    • 1
  • Matan Shnaiderman
    • 1
  • Tatyana Chernonog
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ManagementBar-Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations