Skip to main content
Log in

A distance-based control chart for monitoring multivariate processes using support vector machines

  • Data Mining and Analytics
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional control charts assume a baseline parametric model, against which new observations are compared in order to identify significant departures from the baseline model. To monitor a process without a baseline model, real-time contrasts (RTC) control charts were recently proposed to monitor classification errors when seperarting new observations from limited phase I data using a binary classifier. In contrast to the RTC framework, the distance between an in-control dataset and a dataset of new observations can also be used to measure the shift of the process. In this paper, we propose a distance-based multivariate process control chart using support vector machines (SVM), referred to as D-SVM chart. The SVM classifier provides a continuous score or distance from the boundary for each observation and allows smaller sample sizes than the previously random forest based RTC charts. An extensive experimental study shows that the RTC charts with the SVM scores are more efficient than those with the random forest for detecting changes in high-dimensional processes and/or non-normal processes. A real-life example from a mobile phone assembly process is also considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amiri, A., & Allahyari, S. (2012). Change point estimation methods for control chart postsignal diagnostics: A literature review. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 28(7), 673–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinnam, R. (2002). Support vector machines for recognizing shifts in correlated and other manufacturing processes. International Journal of Production Research, 40(17), 4449–4466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D., & Chiu, C. (1998). Using radial basis function neural networks to recognize shifts in correlated manufacturing process parameters. IIE Transactions, 30(3), 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosier, R. B. (1988). Multivariate generalizations of cumulative sum quality-control schemes. Technometrics, 30(3), 291–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, H., Runger, G., & Tuv, E. (2012). System monitoring with real-time contrasts. Journal of Quality Technology, 44(1), 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandvalet, Y., Mariethoz, J., & Bengio, S. (2005). A probabilistic interpretation of SVMs with an application to unbalanced classification semi-parametric classification. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15 (Vol. 15). IDIAP-RR 05-26.

  • Guh, R.-S., & Shiue, Y.-R. (2008). An effective application of decision tree learning for on-line detection of mean shifts in multivariate control charts. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 55(2), 475–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. M., & Qiu, P. (2003). The changepoint model for statistical process control. Journal of Quality Technology, 35(4), 355–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. M., & Zamba, K. D. (2005). Statistical process control for shifts in mean or variance using a changepoint formulation. Technometrics, 47(2), 164–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, S.-G., He, Z., & Wang, G. A. (2013). Online monitoring and fault identification of mean shifts in bivariate processes using decision tree learning techniques. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24, 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. H. (1947). Multivariate quality control. In C. Eisenhart, M. W. Hastay, & W. A. Wallis (Eds.), Techniques of statistical analysis (pp. 111–184). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, T. T., Liu, W., & Lin, L. (2003). Intelligent remote monitoring and diagnosis of manufacturing processes using an integrated approach of neural networks and rough sets. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 14(2), 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J., Runger, G., & Tuv, E. (2007). Tuned artificial contrasts to detect signals. International Journal of Production Research, 45(23), 5527–5534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, W., & Lee, J. (2015). Shifting artificial data to detect system failures. International Transactions in Operational Research, 22(2), 363–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, W., Runger, G., & Tuv, E. (2007). Multivariate statistical process control with artificial contrasts. IIE Transactions, 2(39), 659–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemwa, G. T., & Aldrich, C. (2005). Improving process operations using support vector machines and decision trees. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 51(2), 526–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandoker, A. H., Lai, D. T. H., Begg, R. K., & Palaniswami, M. (2007). Wavelet-based feature extraction for support vector machines for screening balance impairments in the elderly. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 15(4), 587–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, C. A., Woodall, W. H., Champ, C. W., & Rigdon, S. E. (1992). A multivariate exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Technometrics, 34(1), 46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maboudou-Tchao, E. M., & Hawkins, D. M. (2011). Self-starting multivariate control charts for location and scale. Journal of Quality Technology, 43(2), 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osuna, E., Freund, R., & Girosi, F. (1997). Training support vector machines: An application to face detection. In IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 130–136.

  • Poursaeidi, M. H., & Kundakcioglu, O. E. (2014). Robust support vector machines for multiple instance learning. Annals of Operations Research, 216(1), 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platt, J. C. (1999). Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. In A. J. Smola, P. Bartlett, B. Scholkopf, & D. Schuurmans (Eds.), Advances in large margin classifiers. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, G. J., & Adams, Niall M. (2012). Two nonparametric control charts for detecting arbitrary distribution changes. Journal of Quality Technology, 44(2), 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholkopf, B., Smola, A. J., Williamson, R. C., & Bartlett, P. L. (2000). New support vector algorithms. Neural Computation, 12, 1207–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sollich, P. (2000). Probabilistic methods for support vector machines. In S. A. Solla, T. K. Leen, & K. R. Muller (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 349–355). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukchotrat, T., Kim, S. B., & Tsung, F. (2010). One-class classification-based control charts for multivariate process monitoring. IIE Transactions, 42(2), 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. H., & Woodall, W. H. (2000). Change-point detection of mean vector or covariance matrix shifts using multivariate individual observations. IIE Transactions, 32(6), 537–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, R., & Tsung, F. (2003). A kernel-distance-based multivariate control chart using support vector methods. International Journal of Production Research, 41(13), 2975–2989. doi:10.1080/1352816031000075224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suykens, J. A. K., & Vandewalle, J. (1999). Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Processing Letters, 9, 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik, V. N. (1998). Statistical learning theory. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Jiang, W., & Tsui, K. L. (2010). Adjusted support vector machines based on a new loss function. Annals of Operations Research, 174(1), 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J. B., & Xi, L. F. (2009). A neural network ensemble-based model for on-line monitoring and diagnosis of out-of-control signals in multivariate manufacturing processes. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 909–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamba, K. D., & Hawkins, D. M. (2006). A multivariate change-point model for statistical process control. Technometrics, 48(4), 539–549. doi:10.1198/004017006000000291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Chi, Z., Liu, X., & Wang, X. (2007). A novel fuzzy compensation multi-class support vector machine. Applied Intelligence, 27(1), 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, C., Ning, X., & Tsung, F. (2012). LASSO-based multivariate linear profile monitoring. Annals of Operations Research, 192(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the two anonymous referees for their helpful comments. Shuguang He’s research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China #71472132 and #71532008; Wei Jiang’s research was supported by Program of Shanghai Subject Chief Scientist #15XD1502000 and the National Natural Science Foundation of China #71531010, #71172131, and #71325003.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Jiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, S., Jiang, W. & Deng, H. A distance-based control chart for monitoring multivariate processes using support vector machines. Ann Oper Res 263, 191–207 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2186-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2186-4

Keywords

Navigation