Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Close integration of pricing and supply chain decisions has strategic as well as operations level benefits

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Supply chain decision-making processes that are not tightly integrated with marketing decisions may well be costing the firm twice. First, this will promote poor operations level decisions and second, this may provide management with a view of their firm that will lead to inappropriate strategic decisions. The motivation of this paper is to explore the relationships between decision-making at various levels within the firm and, in particular, the relationship between the firm’s strategic and operations decision making. Using the case of a manufacturer managing a supply chain we show that increasing revenues may not increase profits and cutting costs may also reduce profits. We also show that the strategic or tactical view of the firm, and consequently the quality of the firm’s strategic and tactical decisions, can be highly dependent on how the firm makes low-level marketing and supply chain decisions. Our results illustrate the significant benefit available to manufacturers who can successfully and tightly integrate production, logistics, and marketing decision making. Such integration will improve operations level decisions and also provide an improved platform for tactical and strategic decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. www.prospricing.com accessed March 25, 2008.

  2. Manugistics Inc. “Enterprise Profit Optimization,” White paper 2001 online at: http://www.manugistics.com/documents/epo_whitepaper.pdf.

References

  • Amaruchkul, K., Cooper, W. L., & Gupta, D. (2007). Single-leg air-cargo revenue management. Transportation Science, 41(4), 457–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T. K., & Collier, D. A. (1999). A comparative revenue analysis of hotel yield management heuristics. Decision Sciences, 30, 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballou, R. H. (1992). Business logistics management (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beamon, B. M. (1998). Supply chain design and analysis: Models and methods. International Journal of Production Economics, 55(3), 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P. C. (1999). Management science/operations research: A strategic perspective. Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P. C. (2012). The concepts of revenue management: A tutorial. International Transactions in Operational Research, 19(1–2), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P. C., Anderson C. K., & Kaiser S. P. (2001). Is there life after Edelman? Analysis of former finalists reveals OR/MS is alive, well and hard at work long after the award presentations, OR/MS Today, June (pp. 26–31). http://lionhrtpub.com/orms/orms-6-01/bellfr.html.

  • Bell, P. C., & Chen, J. (2006). Cutting costs or enhancing revenues? An example of a multi-product firm with impatient customers illustrates an important choice facing operational researchers. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(4), 443–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitran, G., & Gilbert, S. M. (1996). Managing hotel reservations with uncertain arrivals. Operations Research, 44(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitran, G., & Mondschein, S. (1995). An application of yield management to the hotel industry considering multiple stays. Operations Research, 43(3), 427–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bixby, A., Downs, B., & Self, M. (2006). A scheduling and capable-to-promise application for swift and company. Interfaces, 36(1), 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camm, J. D., Chorman, T. E., Dill, F. A., Evans, J. R., Sweeney, D. J., & Wegryn, G. W. (1997). Blending OR/MS judgment and GIS: Restructuring P&G’s supply chain. Interfaces, 27(1), 128–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & Bell, P. C. (2009). The impact of customer returns on pricing and order decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 195(1), 280–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Wang, J., & Bell, P. C. (2014). Lease expiration management for a single lease term in the apartment industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 238(1), 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C., Choi, T. M., & Tang, C. S. (2011). Price, rebate, and returns supply contracts for coordinating supply chains with price-dependent demands. Production and Operations Management, 20(1), 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. M. (2013). Multi-period risk minimization purchasing models for fashion products with interest rate, budget, and profit target considerations. Annals of Operations Research. doi:10.1007/s10479-013-1453-x.

  • Cross, R. G. (1995). An introduction to revenue management. In D. Jenkins (Ed.), Handbook of airline economics (pp. 443–468). New York, NY: The Aviation Weekly Group of the McGraw-Hill Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, R. T., Forrest, J., & Milne, J. R. (2006). IBM solves mixed-integer program to optimize its semiconductor supply chain. Interfaces, 36(5), 386–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, B., Donofrio, N., Lin, G., & Snowdon, J. (2000). Big benefits for big blue: A variety of projects demonstrate how operations research delivers business value to IBM. OR/MS Today, June.

  • Federgruen, A., & Heching, A. (1999). Combined pricing and inventory control under uncertainty. Operations Research, 47(3), 454–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geraghty, M. K., & Johnson, E. (1997). Revenue management saves national car rental. Interfaces, 27(1), 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geunes, J., & Pardalos, P. (2006). Supply chain optimization. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keene, S., Albert, D., Henby, G., Brohinsky, A. J., & Tayur, S. (2006). Caterpillar’s building construction products division improves and stabilizes product availability. Interfaces, 36(4), 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leachman, R. C., Kang, J., & Lin, V. (2002). SLIM: Short cycle time and low inventory in manufacturing at samsung electronics. Interfaces, 32(1), 62–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibs, S. (2000). Aided by new software, the automaker is using revenue management to boost the bottom line. CFO Magazine, August 01. http://www.cfo.com/Article?article=1776.

  • Muckstadt, J. A., & Roundy, R. O. (1993). Logistics of production and inventory, Vol. 4: Handbooks in operations research and management. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northwest Newsprint, Inc. case (A). (1998). 9A98E035, Ivey Publishing.

  • Northwest Newsprint, Inc. case (B). (2009). 9B09E003, Ivey Publishing.

  • Pooley, J. (1994). Integrated production and distribution facility planning at Ault foods. Interfaces, 24(4), 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B., Leimkuhler, J., Darrow, R., & Samuels, J. (1992). Yield management at American Airlines. Interfaces, 22(1), 8–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talluri, K., & van Ryzin, G. (2004). The theory and practice of revenue management (1st ed.). Boston: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vollmann, T. E., Berry, W. L., Whybark, D. C., & Jacobs, F. R. (2005). Manufacturing planning and control for supply chain management. The McGraw-Hill/Irwin series in operations and decision sciences. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. W. (2007). Market segmentation. http://www.decisionanalyst.com.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Chen.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Proof of result 1

From (2) we construct the Lagrangian:

$$\begin{aligned} \textit{RV}={\sum }_{j=1}^N {P_{\!j} (a_j -b_j P_{\!j} )} +\lambda \left[ \sum _{j=1}^N (a_j -b_j P_{\!j} ) -Q\right] \end{aligned}$$

The first order conditions for a maximum with respect to \(P_{j}\) are:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial \textit{RV}}{\partial P_{\!j} }=0\hbox { gives: }P_j =\frac{a_j }{2b_{\!j}}-\frac{\lambda }{2}. \end{aligned}$$

To find \(\lambda \) we note that \({\sum }_{j=1}^N {(a_j-b_j P_j)}=Q\) hence:

$$\begin{aligned} {\sum }_{j=1}^N {(a_j+\lambda b_j)}=2Q. \end{aligned}$$

Writing \({\sum }_{j=1}^N {a_j=A}\) and \({\sum }_{j=1}^N {b_j=B}\), then \(A+\lambda B=2Q\hbox { or }\lambda =(2Q-A)/B\), which lead to

$$\begin{aligned} P_j^{*}=\frac{a_j }{2b_j}-\frac{Q}{B}+\frac{A}{2B} \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bell, P.C., Chen, J. Close integration of pricing and supply chain decisions has strategic as well as operations level benefits. Ann Oper Res 257, 77–93 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1784-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1784-2

Keywords

Navigation