Engagement in After-School Programs as a Predictor of Social Competence and Academic Performance

Original Paper

Abstract

Using the experience sampling method, this study examined two questions related to outcomes associated with after-school programming. First, does the quality of experience in after-school programs mediate the effect of program participation on social competence and academic performance? Second, among program participants, is the difference in quality of experience when in programs versus other settings after school related to higher social competence and academic performance? Middle school students (N = 196) attending eight programs in three Midwestern states reported a total of 4,970 randomly sampled experiences in and out of after-school programs during 1 week in the fall and spring of the 2001–2002 academic year. Engagement during after-school hours partially mediated the relationship between participation in after-school programs and social competence. In addition, relative perceptions of engagement, challenge, and importance when in after-school programs compared to elsewhere after school predicted higher English and math grades. Results suggest that the quality of experiences in after-school programs may be a more important factor than quantity of experiences (i.e., dosage) in predicting positive academic outcomes.

Keywords

Engagement Middle school After-school programs Social competence Academic performance Outcomes Adolescence Subjective experience Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Flow Mediation 

References

  1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohnert, A. M., Aikins, J. W., & Edidin, J. (2007). The role of organized activities in facilitating social adaptation across the transition to college. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohnert, A. M., Richards, M. H., Kolmodin, K. E., & Lakin, B. L. (2008). Young urban African adolescents’ experience of discretionary time activities. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18, 517–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003. Review of Educational Research, 76, 1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, H., Valentine, J. C., Nye, B., & Lindsay, J. J. (1999). Relationships between five after-school activities and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Kleiber, D. A. (1991). Leisure and self-actualization. In B. L. Driver, P. J. Brown, & G. L. Peterson (Eds.), Benefits of leisure (pp. 91–102). State College: Venture.Google Scholar
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1984). Being adolescent: Conflict and growth in the teenage years. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Darling, N. (2005). Participation in extracurricular activities and adolescent adjustment: Cross-sectional and longitudinal findings. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 493–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darling, N., Caldwell, L. L., & Smith, R. (2005). Participation in school-based extracurricular activities and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Leisure Research, 37, 51–76.Google Scholar
  13. Dubas, J. S., & Snider, B. A. (1993). The role of community-based youth groups in enhancing learning and achievement through non-formal education. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Early adolescence: Perspectives on research, policy, and intervention (pp. 159–174). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2007). The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL).Google Scholar
  15. Dworkin, J. B., Larson, R., & Hansen, D. (2003). Adolescents’ accounts of growth experiences in youth activities. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eagly, A. H. (1997). Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, 52, 1380–1383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. A. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  18. Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2006a). Extracurricular involvement and adolescent adjustment: Impact of duration, number of activities, and breadth of participation. Applied Developmental Science, 10, 132–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2006b). Is extracurricular participation associated with beneficial outcomes? Concurrent and longitudinal relations. Developmental Psychology, 42, 698–713.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), A life worth living: Contributions to positive psychology (pp. 85–103). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Grewal, D. D., & Salovey, P. (2006). Benefits of emotional intelligence. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), A life worth living: Contributions to positive psychology (pp. 104–119). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hansen, D. M., & Larson, R. W. (2007). Amplifiers of developmental and negative experiences in organized activities: Dosage, motivation, lead roles, and adult-youth ratios. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 360–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hansen, D. M., Larson, R. W., & Dworkin, J. B. (2003). What adolescents learn in organized youth activities: A survey of self-reported developmental experiences. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 25–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Hill, S. (Ed.). (2008). Afterschool matters: Creative programs that connect youth development and student achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  27. Izard, C. E. (2002). Translating emotion theory and research into preventive interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 796–824.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. James-Burdumy, S., Dynarski, M., & Deke, J. (2007). When elementary schools stay open late: Results from the national evaluation of the 21st century community learning centers program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, 296–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jarrett, R. L. (1998). African American children, families, and neighborhoods: Qualitative contributions to understanding developmental pathways. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jordan, W. J., & Nettles, S. M. (2000). How students invest their time out of school: Effects on school-related outcomes. Social Psychology of Education, 3, 217–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahne, J., Nagaoka, J., Brown, A. L., O’Brien, J., Quinn, T., & Thiede, K. (2001). Assessing after-school programs as contexts for youth development. Youth and Society, 32, 421–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 33–265). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kuncel, N. R., Crede, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 170–183.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Larson, R. W., & Brown, J. R. (2007). Emotional development in adolescence: What can be learned from a high school theater program? Child Development, 78, 1083–1099.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Leone, C. M., & Richards, M. H. (1989). Classwork and homework in early adolescence: The ecology of achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18(6), 531–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mahoney, J. L., Larson, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Lord, H. (2005a). Organized activities as development contexts for children and adolescents. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 3–22). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Mahoney, J. L., Lord, H., & Carryl, E. (2005b). An ecological analysis of after-school program participation and the development of academic performance and motivational attributes for disadvantaged children. Child Development, 76, 811–825.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mahoney, J. L., Parente, M. E., & Lord, H. (2007). After-school program engagement: Links to child competence and program quality and content. Elementary School Journal, 107, 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mahoney, J. L., Schweder, A. E., & Stattin, H. (2002). Structured after-school activities as a moderator of depressed mood for adolescents with detached relations to their parents. Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McGuire, J. K., & Gamble, W. C. (2006). Community service for youth: The value of psychological engagement over numbers of hours spent. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 289–298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. McHale, S. M., Crouter, A. C., & Tucker, C. J. (2001). Free-time activities in middle childhood: Links with adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 72, 1764–1778.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. McLaughlin, M. W., Irby, M. A., & Langman, J. (1994). Urban sanctuaries: Neighborhood organizations in the lives and futures of inner-city youth. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  44. Miller, B. M. (2003). Critical hours: After-school programs and educational success. Retrieved 14 June 2006, from http://www.nmefdn.org/CriticalHours.htm.
  45. Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality, 64, 266–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nakamura, J. (1988). Optimal experience and the uses of talent. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 319–326). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Newmann, F. M. (Ed.). (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  48. Nowell, A., & Hedges, L. V. (1998). Trends in gender differences in academic achievement from 1960 to 1994: An analysis of differences in mean, variance, and extreme scores. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 39, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pierce, K. M., Hamm, J. V., & Vandell, D. L. (1999). Experiences in after-school programs and children’s adjustment in first-grade classrooms. Child Development, 70, 756–767.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Radziszewska, B., & Rogoff, B. (1991). Children’s guided participation in planning imaginary errands with skilled adult or peer partners. Developmental Psychology, 27, 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rogoff, B., Baker-Sennett, J., Lacasa, P., & Goldsmith, D. (1995). Development through participation in sociocultural activity. In J. J. Goodnow, P. J. Miller, & F. Kessel (Eds.), Cultural practices as contexts for development (Vol. 45–65). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  52. Salovey, P., Rothman, A. J., Detweiler, J. B., & Steward, W. T. (2000). Emotional states and physical health. American Psychologist, 55, 110–121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Schmidt, J. A., Shernoff, D. J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Individual and situational factors related to the experience of flow in adolescence: A multilevel approach. In A. D. Ong & M. V. Dulmen (Eds.), The handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 542–558). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 158–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shernoff, D. J., & Hoogstra, L. (2001). Continuing motivation beyond the high school classroom. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 93, 73–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Shernoff, D. J., & Vandell, D. L. (2007). Engagement in after-school program activities: Quality of experience from the perspective of participants. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 891–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vandell, D. L., Pierce, K. M., & Dadisman, K. (2005a). Out-of-school settings as a developmental context for children and youth. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 33, pp. 43–77). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  58. Vandell, D. L., Shernoff, D. J., Pierce, K. M., Bolt, D. M., Dadisman, K., & Brown, B. B. (2005b). Activities, engagement, and emotion in after-school programs (and elsewhere). New Directions for Youth Development, 105, 121–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Vandell, D. L., & Shumow, L. (1999). After-school child care programs. Future of Children, 9, 64–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Vandell, D. L., Shumow, L., & Posner, J. (2005c). After-school programs for low-income children: Differences in program quality. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 437–456). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Community Research and Action 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Leadership, Educational Psychology and FoundationsNorthern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA

Personalised recommendations