More Than Attendance: The Importance of After-School Program Quality

  • Barton J. Hirsch
  • Megan A. Mekinda
  • JulieAnn Stawicki
Original Paper

Abstract

A central theme of the articles featured in this issue is the need to improve the quality of after-school programs. In this commentary, we discuss why student engagement, program characteristics and implementation, staff training, and citywide policy are key considerations in the effort to define and achieve high quality programs for youth.

Keywords

Program quality Program implementation After-school Staff training Attendance 

References

  1. Benson, P. L., Mannes, M., Pittman, K., & Ferber, T. (2004). Youth development, developmental assets, and public policy. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 781–814). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change, Vol. VIII: Implementing and sustaining innovations. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  3. Cross, A. B., Gottfredson, D. C., Wilson, D. M., Rorie, M., & Connell, N. (2010). Implementation quality and positive experiences in after-school programs. American Journal of Community Psychology. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9295-z.
  4. Davis, J., & Farbman, D. A. (2002). Schools alone are not enough: After-school programs and education reform in Boston. New directions for youth development: Theory, practice, and research, 94, 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deutsch, N. L. (2008). Pride in the projects: Teens building identities in urban contexts. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  7. Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., et al. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on adolescents’ experiences in schools and families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Eldredge, S., Piha, S., & Levin, J. (2002). Building the San Francisco Beacons. New directions for youth development: Theory, practice, and research, 94, 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferrin, D., & Amick, S. (2002). San Diego’s 6 to 6: A community’s commitment to out-of-school time. New directions for youth development: Theory, practice, and research, 94, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedman, L. N., & Bleiberg, M. S. (2002). The long-term sustainability of after-school programs: The after-school corporation’s strategy. New directions for youth development: Theory, practice, and research, 94, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirsch, B. J. (2005). A place to call home: After-school programs for urban youth. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association and New York: Teachers College Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hirsch, B. J., DuBois, D. & Deutsch, N. (in press). Building quality after-school centers: Case studies of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Holleman, M. A., Sundius, M. J., & Bruns, E. J. (2010). Building opportunity: Developing city systems to expand and improve after school programs. American Journal of Community Psychology. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9308-y.
  14. Larson, R., Jarrett, R., Hansen, D., Pearce, N., Sullivan, P., & Walker, K. (2004). Organized youth activities as contexts for positive development. In P. A. Lindley, S. Joseph, et al. (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 540–560). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Lerner, R. M. (2004). Liberty: Thriving and civic engagement among American youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Mahoney, J. L., Vandell, D. L., Simpkins, S., & Zarrett, N. (2009). Adolescent out-of-school activities. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology, contextual influences on adolescent development (Vol 2). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. McLaughlin, M. W., Irby, M. A., & Langman, J. (1994). Urban sanctuaries: Neighborhood organizations in the lives and futures of inner-city youth. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Ogletree, R., Bell, T., & Smith, N. K. (2002). Positive youth development initiatives in Chicago. New directions for youth development: Theory, practice, and research, 94, 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pierce, K. M., Bolt, D. M., & Vandell, D. L. (2010). Specific features of after-school program quality: Associations with children’s functioning in middle childhood. American Journal of Community Psychology. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9304-2.
  20. Riggs, N. R, Bohnert, A. M., Guzman, M. D., & Davidson, D. (2010). Examining the potential of community-based after-school programs for Latino youth. American Journal of Community Psychology. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9313-1.
  21. Roth, J. L., Malone, L. M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2010). Does the amount of participation in afterschool programs relate to developmental outcomes? A review of the literature. American Journal of Community Psychology. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9303-3.
  22. Sarason, S. B. (1982). The culture of the school and the problem of change (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  23. Sheldon, J., Arbreton, A., Hopkins, L., & Grossman, J. B. (2010). Investing in success: Key strategies for building quality in after-school programs. American Journal of Community Psychology. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9296-y.
  24. Shernoff, D. J. (2010). Engagement in after-school programs as a predictor of social competence and academic performance. American Journal of Community Psychology. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9314-0.
  25. Weiss, H. B., Little, P. M. D., & Bouffard, S. M. (2005). More than just being there: Balancing the participation equation. New Directions in Youth Development, 105, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Community Research and Action 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barton J. Hirsch
    • 1
  • Megan A. Mekinda
    • 1
  • JulieAnn Stawicki
    • 1
  1. 1.Program in Human Development and Social PolicyNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations