Does the Amount of Participation in Afterschool Programs Relate to Developmental Outcomes? A Review of the Literature

  • Jodie L. Roth
  • Lizabeth M. Malone
  • Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
Original Paper

Abstract

Contrary to the findings from previous reviews we found little support for the general notion that greater amounts of participation in afterschool programs was related to academic, behavioral, or socio-emotional outcomes. However, some relationships did emerge depending on how participation was conceptualized and measured, and the methodology used to assess the relationship between participation and outcomes. For example, some benefits occurred when participants with high levels of participation were compared to non-participants, not when they were compared to other program participants. Several suggestions are offered to improve future research on the relationship between aspects of participation and developmental outcomes.

Keywords

Afterschool programs Participation Attendance Outcomes Youth 

References

References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the review

  1. Afterschool Alliance. (2004). America after 3 pm: A household survey of afterschool in America. Retrieved from http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/press_archives/america_3pm/Executive_Summary.pdf.
  2. Arbreton, A., Bradshaw, M., Metz, R., & Sheldon, J. (with Pepper, S.). (2008). More time for teens:Understanding teen participationfrequency, intensity, and durationin Boys & Girls Clubs. Retrieved from http://www.ppv.org/ppv/publications/assets/231_publication.pdf.
  3. *Arbreton, A. J. A., Goldsmith, J., & Sheldon, J. (2005). Launching literacy in after-school programs: Early lessons from the CORAL initiative. Retrieved from http://www.ppv.org/ppv/publications/assets/192_publication.pdf.
  4. *Arbreton, A. J. A., & McClanahan, W. S. (2002). Targeted outreach: Boys and girls clubs of America’s approach to gang prevention and intervention. Retrieved from http://www.ppv.org/ppv/publications/assets/148_publication.pdf.
  5. Arbreton, A., Sheldon, J., Bradshaw, M., & Goldsmith, J. (with Jucovy, L. & Pepper, S.). (2008). Advancing achievement: Findings from an independent evaluation of a major after-school initiative. Retrieved from http://www.ppv.org/ppv/publications/assets/225_publication.pdf.
  6. *Baker, D., & Witt, P. A. (1996). Evaluation of the impact of two after-school programs. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 14, 23–44.Google Scholar
  7. Bartko, W. T. (2005). The ABCs of engagement in out-of-school-time programs. New Directions for Youth Development, 2005, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bodilly, S. J., & Beckett, M. K. (2005). Making out-of-school time matter: Evidence for an action agenda (Report No. MG-242-WF). Retrieved from http://rand.org/pubs/monographs/2005/RAND_MG242.pdf.
  9. Borden, L. M., Perkins, D. F., Villarruel, F. A., & Stone, M. R. (2005). To participate or not to participate: That is the question. New Directions for Youth Development, 2005, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carver, P. R., & Iruka, I. U. (2006). After-school programs and activities: 2005 (NCES 2006-076). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006076.
  11. *Center for Prevention Research and Development. (2004). Teen REACH: Annual evaluation report. Retrieved from http://www.cprd.uiuc.edu/research/highrisk-pubs/TRAnnualReport04.pdf.
  12. *Chang-Rios, K. (2007). The relationship between afterschool participation and academic achievement: Does intensity of participation matter? Retrieved from ProQuest Digital dissertations. (AAT 3255073).Google Scholar
  13. *Chappel, L. J. (2004). Building resilience: A study of the academic achievement, school attendance, and self-concept of students in grades 35 who participated in a 21st century community learning center’s after-school program. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 3129980).Google Scholar
  14. Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2007). The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills. Retrieved from http://www.casel.org/downloads/ASP-Full.pdf.
  15. *Dynarski, M., James-Burdumy, M. S., Moore, M., Rosenberg, L., Deke, J., & Mansfield, W. (2004). When schools stay open late: The national evaluation of the 21st Century Community Learning Centers program. New findings. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pdf/20043001.pdf.
  16. *Dynarski, M., Moore, M., Mullens, J., Gleason, P., James-Burdumy, S., Rosenberg, L., et al. (2003). When schools stay open late: The national evaluation of the 21st-Century Community Learning Centers program. First year findings. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/21cent/firstyear/firstyear.pdf.
  17. Eccles, J. S., & Gootman, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  18. *Espino, J., Fabiano, L., & Pearson, L. M. (2004). Citizen Schools: Evidence from two student cohorts on the use of community resources to promote youth development. Retrieved from http://www.policystudies.com/studies/youth/CS%20Report_8-30-04.pdf.
  19. *Fabiano, L., Pearson, L. M., Reisner, E. R., & Williams, I. J. (2006). Preparing students in the middle grades to succeed in high school: Findings from phase IV of the citizen schools evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.policystudies.com/studies/youth/Citizen%20Schools%20Phase%20IV%20Final%20Report_12-26-06.pdf.
  20. *Fabiano, L., Pearson, L. M., & Williams, I. J. (2005). Putting students on a pathway to academic and social success: Phase III findings of the Citizen Schools evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.policystudies.com/studies/youth/CS%20Phase%20III%202005.pdf.
  21. Fiester, L. (with Policy Studies Associates). (2004). Afterschool counts! A guide to issues and strategies for monitoring attendance in afterschool and other youth programs. New York: The After School Project, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.pasesetter.com/documents/pdf/After%20School%20Counts1.pdf.
  22. Gambone, M. A., & Arbreton, A. J. A. (1997). Safe havens: The contribution of youth organizations to healthy adolescent development. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.Google Scholar
  23. Glass, G. V. (2000). Meta-analysis at 25. Retrieved from http://glass.ed.asu.edu/gene/papers/meta25.html.
  24. Goerge, R., Cusick, G. R., Wasserman, M., & Gladden, R. M. (2007). After-school programs and academic impact: A study of Chicago’s after school matters (Issue Brief # 112). Retrieved from http://www.chapinhall.org/article_abstract.aspx?ar=1444.
  25. *Goldschmidt, P., & Huang, D. (2007). The long-term effects of after-school programming on educational adjustment and juvenile crime: A study of the LA’s BEST after-school program. Retrieved from http://www.lasbest.org/resourcecenter/LASBEST_DOJ_Final%20Report.pdf.
  26. Granger, R. C. (2008). After-school programs and academics: Implications for policy, practice, and research. Social Policy Report, 22(2), 1–19.Google Scholar
  27. Guavain, M., & Perez, S. M. (2005). Parent-child participation in planning children’s activities outside of school in European American and Latino families. Child Development, 76, 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Halpern, R. (2002). A different kind of child development institution: The history of after-school programs for low-income children. Teachers College Record, 104, 178–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Herrera, C., & Arbreton, A. J. A. (2003). Increasing opportunities for older youth in after-school programs. Retrieved from http://www.ppv.org/ppv/publications/assets/146_publication.pdf.
  30. *Huang, D., Gribbons, B., Kim, K. S., Lee, C., & Baker, E. L. (2000). A decade of results: The impact of the LA’s BEST after school enrichment program on subsequent student achievement and performance. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation.Google Scholar
  31. *Huang, D., Kim, K. S., Marshall, A., & Pérez, P. (2005). Keeping kids in school: An LA’s BEST example; a study examining the long-term impact of LA’s BEST on students’ dropout rates. Retrieved from http://www.lasbest.org/resourcecenter/Keeping_Kids_in_School_Exec_Sum.pdf.
  32. *James-Burdumy, S., Dynarski, M., Moore, M., Deke, J., Mansfield, W., & Pistorino, C. (2005). When schools stay open late: The national evaluation of the 21st century community learning centers program. Final report. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/other/cclcfinalreport/cclcfinal.pdf.
  33. *Jenner, E., & Jenner, L. W. (2007). Results from a first-year evaluation of academic impacts of an after-school program for at-risk students. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 12, 213–237.Google Scholar
  34. Kane, T. J. (2004). The impact of after-school programs: Interpreting the results of four recent evaluations (working paper). Retrieved from http://www.wtgrantfoundation.org/usr_doc/After-school_paper.pdf.
  35. Lamdin, D. J. (1996). Evidence of student attendance as an independent variable in education production functions. The Journal of EducationalResearch, 89, 155–162.Google Scholar
  36. Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., Snow, D., & Martin-Glenn, M. L. (2006). Out-of-school time programs: A meta-analysis of effects for at-risk students. Review of Educational Research, 76, 275–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lauver, S., Little, P., & Weiss, H. (2004). Moving beyond the barriers: Attracting and sustaining youth participation in out-of-school time programs (Number 6). Retrieved from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/projects/afterschool/resources/issuebrief6.html.
  38. *Leake, R., & Gardner, V. A. (2006). Denver public schools department of extended learning and community schools: Out-of-school-time evaluation report, 20052006 school year. Retrieved from http://www.denvergov.org/Portals/391/documents/2005-2006%20DPS%20Report_112896.pdf.
  39. *Lodestar Management/Research. (2005). Woodcraft rangers annual evaluation report for 20032004. Retrieved from http://www.lmresearch.com/images/WReport0304.pdf.
  40. Mahoney, J. L., Larson, R. W., & Eccles, J. S. (Eds.). (2005). Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  41. *Mahoney, J. L., Lord, H., & Carryl, E. (2005b). Afterschool program participation and the development of child obesity and peer acceptance. Applied Developmental Science, 9, 202–215.Google Scholar
  42. *Mahoney, J. L., Lord, H., & Carryl, E. (2005c). An ecological analysis of after-school program participation and the development of academic performance and motivational attributes for disadvantaged children. Child Development, 76, 811–825.Google Scholar
  43. *Mahoney, J. L., Parente, M. E., & Lord, H. (2007). After-school program engagement: Links to child competence and program quality and content. The Elementary School Journal, 107, 385–404.Google Scholar
  44. Marsh, H. W., & Kleitman, S. (2002). Extracurricular school activities: The good, the bad, and the nonlinear. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 464–511.Google Scholar
  45. Metz, R. A., Goldsmith, J., & Arbreton, A. J. A. (2008). Putting it all together: Guiding principles for quality after-school programs serving preteens. Retrieved from http://www.ppv.org/ppv/youth/youth_publications.asp?section_id=8#pub234 .
  46. *Moldow, E. (2007). After-school program activities and academic achievement: A study in one urban K-8 school. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 3278159).Google Scholar
  47. Moore, K. A. (2008). Quasi-experimental evaluations (Publication #2008-04). Retrieved from http://www.childtrends.org/Files//Child_Trends-2008_01_16_Evaluation6.pdf.
  48. *Morrison, G. M., Storino, M. H., Robertson, L. M., Weissglass, T., & Dondero, A. (2000). The protective function of after-school programming and parent education and support for students at risk for substance use. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 365–371.Google Scholar
  49. Pearson, L. M., Russell, C. A., & Reisner, E. R. (2007). Evaluation of OST programs for youth: Patterns of youth retention in OST programs, 2005–06 to 2006–07. Retrieved from http://www.policystudies.com/studies/youth/Year%202%20Report.pdf.
  50. *Pettit, G. S., Laird, R. D., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (1997). Patterns of after school care in middle childhood: Risk factors and developmental outcomes. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 515–538.Google Scholar
  51. *Prenovost, J. K. E. (2001). A first-year evaluation of after-school learning programs in four urban middle schools in the Santa Ana Unified School District. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 3007008).Google Scholar
  52. Redd, Z., Cochran, S., Hair, E., & Moore, K. (2002). Academic achievement programs and youth development: A synthesis. Retrieved from www.childtrends.org/what_works/clarkwww/acadach/acadachrpt.pdf.
  53. *Reisner, E. R., White, R. N., Russell, C. A., & Birmingham, J. (2004). Building quality, scale and effectiveness in after-school programs: Summary report of the TASC evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.policystudies.com/studies/youth/TASC%20Summary%20Report%20Final.pdf.
  54. *Riggs, N. R. (2006). After-school program attendance and the social development of rural Latino children of immigrant families. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 75–87.Google Scholar
  55. *Riggs, N. R., & Greenberg, M. T. (2004). Moderators in the academic development of migrant Latino children attending after-school programs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 349–367.Google Scholar
  56. Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Roth, J. L., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). What exactly is a youth development program? Answers from research and practice. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Roth, J. L., Malone, L. M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2008). Series on time matters in organized activities. New York: National Center for Children and Families, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  59. Search Institute. (2006a). 40 developmental assets for adolescents. Retrieved from www.search-institute.org/research/40Assest.pdf.
  60. Search Institute. (2006b). 40 developmental assets for middle childhood. Retrieved from www.search-institute.org/research/40AssestMC.pdf.
  61. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  62. Simpkins, S. C., Little, P. M. D., & Weiss, H. B. (2004). Understanding and measuring attendance in out-of-school time programs (Number 7). Retrieved from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/content/projects/afterschool/resources/issuebrief7.pdf.
  63. *Texas Education Agency. (2005). 21st Century Community Learning Centers: Evaluation of projects funded during the 20032004 school year. Retrieved from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/opge/progeval/OutOfSchoolLearning/21cclc_03_04_eval.pdf.
  64. *Texas Education Agency. (2007). 21st Century community learning centers: Evaluation of projects funded during the 20042005 school year. Retrieved from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/opge/progeval/OutOfSchoolLearning/21cclc_02-07_FinalReport.pdf.
  65. *Vandell, D. L., Reisner, E. R., Brown, B. B., Dadisman, K., Pierce, K. M., Lee, D., et al. (2005). The study of promising after-school programs: Examination of intermediate outcomes in year 2. Retrieved from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/childcare/pdf/pp/year_2_report_final.pdf.
  66. *Vandell, D. L., Reisner, E. R., & Pierce, K. M. (2007). Outcomes linked to high-quality afterschool programs: Longitudinal findings from the study of promising afterschool programs. Retrieved from http://www.policystudies.com/studies/youth/Promising%20Programs%20FINAL.pdf.
  67. *Vandell, D. L., Reisner, E. R., Pierce, K. M., Brown, B. B., Lee, D., Bolt, D., et al. (2006). The study of promising after-school programs: Examination of longer term outcomes after two years of program experiences. Retrieved from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/childcare/pdf/pp/year_3_report_final.pdf.
  68. Vandell, D. L., Shernoff, D. J., Pierce, K. M., Bolt, D. M., Dadisman, K., & Brown, B. B. (2005). Activities, engagement, and emotion in after-school programs (and elsewhere). New Directions for Youth Development, 2005, 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van Egeren, L., Wu, H., Hawkins, D., & Sturdevant Reed, C. (2006). Academics, youth development, or both? Activity types make a difference. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  70. *Vanderploeg, J. J. (2005). An after-school program for elementary school aged children: Academic and socio-emotional outcomes. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 3193698).Google Scholar
  71. *Walker, K., & Arbreton, A. (2004). After-school pursuits: An examination of outcomes in the San Francisco Beacon initiative. Retrieved from http://www.ppv.org/ppv/publications/assets/168_publication.pdf.
  72. Weiss, H. B., Little, P. M. D., & Bouffard, S. M. (2005). More than just being there: Balancing the participation equation. New Directions for Youth Development, 2005, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yohalem, N., & Wilson-Ahlstrom, A. (with Fischer, S., & Shinn, M.). (2007). Measuring youth program quality: A guide to assessment tools. Retrieved from http://www.peecworks.org/PEEC/PEEC_Inst/02F19B46-007EA7AB.0/Yohalem%202007%20Measuring_Youth_Program_Quality.pdf.

Copyright information

© Society for Community Research and Action 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jodie L. Roth
    • 1
  • Lizabeth M. Malone
    • 1
  • Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
    • 1
  1. 1.National Center for Children and Families, Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations