Understanding and Improving the Effectiveness of After-School Practice

Brief Communication

Abstract

The question driving research on after-school programs is shifting from “do programs make a difference,” to “why are some programs effective while others are not?” This article draws on the work in this volume and related studies to suggest that there is an emerging consensus on the importance of staff-youth interactions as a determinant of program effectiveness. The commentary recommends that future research should continue to focus on understanding and improving program practices at the point-of-service. In doing so, two lines of inquiry seem promising. The first involves linking measures of changes in staff-youth interactions to changes in developmental outcomes. The second is to examine how policies or other interventions intended to improve program effectiveness affect the practices of line staff.

Keywords

After-school Commentary Future research Policy Program improvement 

References

  1. Afterschool Alliance. (2008). Evaluations backgrounder: A summary of formal evaluations of after-school programs’ impact on behavior, safety, and family life. Washington, D.C.: Afterschool Alliance.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, D., Raudenbush, S., & Ball, D. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2007). The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.Google Scholar
  4. Granger, R. C. (2008). After-school programs and academics: Implications for policy, practice, and research. Social Policy Report, 22(2), 3–11.Google Scholar
  5. Granger, R. C., Durlak, J. A., Yohalem, N., & Reisner, E. (2007). Improving after-school program quality. New York, NY: William T. Grant Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., Snow, D., & Martin-Glenn, M. L. (2006). Out-of-school time programs: A meta-analysis of effects for at-risk students. Review of Educational Research, 76, 275–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. National Institute on Out-of-School Time. (2009). Making the case: A 2009 fact sheet on children and youth in out-of-school time. Wellesley, MA: National Institute on Out-of-School Time.Google Scholar
  8. Simpkins, S. D., Eccles, J. S., & Becnel, J. N. (2008). The role of breadth in activity participation and friends in adolescents’ adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1081–1094.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Smith, C., Akiva, T., & Henry, B. (2006). Quality in the out-of-school time sector: Insights from the youth PQA validation study. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for research on adolescence, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  10. Spielberger, J., & Lockaby, T. (2008). Palm beach county’s prime time initiative: Improving the quality of after-school programs. Chicago: Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  11. The Forum for Youth Investment. (2009). Raising the bar: Quality improvement systems for youth programs. (Out-of-School Time Policy Commentary #15). Washington, D.C.: The Forum for Youth Investment.Google Scholar
  12. Tseng, V., & Seidman, E. (2007). A systems framework for understanding social settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 217–228.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wimer, C., Simpkins, S. D., Dearing, E., Caronongan, P., Bouffard, S., & Weiss, H. B. (2008). Predicting youth out-of-school time participation: Multiple risks and developmental differences. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 54, 179–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Yohalem, N., Granger, R. C., & Pittman, K. J. (2009a). The quest for quality: Recent development and future directions for the out-of-school time field. In N. Yohalem, R. C. Granger, & K. J. Pittman (Eds.), Defining and measuring quality in youth programs and classrooms. New Directions for Youth Development, 121, 129–140.Google Scholar
  15. Yohalem, N., Wilson-Ahlstrom, A., Fischer, S., & Shinn, M. (2009b). Measuring youth program quality: A guide to assessment tools (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: The Forum for Youth Investment.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Community Research and Action 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.William T. Grant FoundationWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations