Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 1652–1661 | Cite as

HIV Status Disclosure Among Postpartum Women in Zambia with Varied Intimate Partner Violence Experiences

  • Karen M. Hampanda
  • Christine Tagliaferri Rael
Original Paper

Abstract

HIV-positive pregnant and postpartum women’s status disclosure to male sexual partners is associated with improved HIV and maternal and child health outcomes. Yet, status disclosure remains a challenge for many women living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly those who are fearful of violence. The objective of the present study is to advance the current understanding of the relationship between intimate partner violence against women and their HIV status disclosure behaviors. We specifically evaluate how the severity, frequency, and type of violence against postpartum HIV-positive women affect status disclosure within married/cohabiting couples. A cross-sectional survey was administered by trained local research assistants to 320 HIV-positive postpartum women attending a large public health center for pediatric immunizations in Lusaka, Zambia. Survey data captured women’s self-reports of various forms of intimate partner violence and whether they disclosed their HIV status to the current male partner. Multiple logistic regression models determined the odds of status disclosure by the severity, frequency, and type of violence women experienced. Our findings indicate a negative dose–response relationship between the severity and frequency of intimate partner violence and status disclosure to male partners. Physical violence has a more pronounced affect on status disclosure than sexual or emotional violence. Safe options for women living with HIV who experience intimate partner violence, particularly severe and frequent physical violence, are urgently needed. This includes HIV counselors’ ability to evaluate the pros and cons of status disclosure among women and support some women’s decisions not to disclose.

Keywords

HIV status disclosure Couples affected by HIV Intimate partner violence Sub-Saharan Africa Zambia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Yusuf Ahmed, Christine Chewe Sakala, Grace Lungeani Phiri, Franklin Munsanje, and Bibi Lambert Manda for their contribution to the study. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health (Award Number F31MH107348) and the University of Colorado Center for Global Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This study was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health (Award Number F31MH107348) and the University of Colorado Center for Global Health. Dr. Hampanda declares that she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Rael declares that she has no conflict of interest. All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. The study was approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB) and the Excellence in Research Ethics and Science (ERES) Converge Zambia. Informed written consent (or a thumbprint) was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicting interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Maman S. HIV status disclosure to families for social support in South Africa (NIMH project accept/HPTN 043). AIDS Care. 2014;26(2):226–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Matthews C, et al. Disclosure of HIV status and its consequences. S Afr Med J. 1999;89:1238.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peltzer K, et al. Promoting male involvement to improve PMTCT uptake and reduce antenatal HIV infection: a cluster randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:778.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hampanda KM. Intimate partner violence and HIV-positive women’s non-adherence to antiretroviral medication for the purpose of prevention of mother-to-child transmission in Lusaka, Zambia. Soc Sci Med. 2016;153:123–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stirratt MJ, et al. The role of HIV serostatus disclosure in antiretroviral medication adherence. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(5):483–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Medley A, et al. Rates, barriers and outcomes of HIV serostatus disclosure among women in developing countries: implications for prevention of mother-to-child transmission programmes. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(4):299–307.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Etiebet MA, et al. Integrating prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission into antenatal care: learning from the experiences of women in South Africa. AIDS Care. 2004;16(1):37–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Msellati P. Improving mothers’ access to PMTCT programs in West Africa: a public health perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(6):807–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mucheto P, et al. Determinants of nondisclosure of HIV status among women attending the prevention of mother to child transmission programme, Makonde district, Zimbabwe, 2009. Pan Afr Med J. 2011;8:51.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tam M, Amzel A, Phelps BR. Disclosure of HIV serostatus among pregnant and postpartum women in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. AIDS Care. 2015;27(4):436–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    CSO, Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2013-14. Central Statistical Office, Ministry of Health, and ICF International: Rockville, Maryland, USA; 2014.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hampanda K. Intimate partner violence and HIV-positive women’s non-adherence to antiretroviral medication for the purpose of prevention of mother-to-child transmission in Lusaka, Zambia. Soc Sci Med. 2016;153:123–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hampanda K. Intimate partner violence against HIV-positive women is associated with sub-optimal infant feeding practices in Lusaka, Zambia. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(12):2599–606.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hampanda KM, Nimz AM, Abuogi LL. Barriers to uptake of early infant HIV testing in Zambia: the role of intimate partner violence and HIV status disclosure within couples. AIDS Res Ther. 2017;14(1):17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen HN, Cohen P, Chen S. How big is a big odds ratio? interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Commun Stat-Simul Comput. 2010;39(4):860–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Faul F, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simoni JM, et al. Self-report measures of antiretroviral therapy adherence: a review with recommendations for HIV research and clinical management. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(3):227–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    National Statistical Office and ICF Macro, Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2010. 2011, NSO and ICF Macro: Zomba, Malawi, and Calverton, Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    World Health Organization (WHO). Putting women first: ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence against women. Department of Gender and Women’s Health Family and Community Health. 2012. http://www.who.int/gender/violence/womenfirtseng.pdf.
  20. 20.
    Straus MA, et al. The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2)—development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues. 1996;17(3):283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    CSO, Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2007. Central Statistical Office (CSO), Ministry of Health (MOH), Tropical diseases research centre (TDRC), University of Zambia, & Macro International Inc.: Calverton, Maryland, USA; 2009.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    MacQuarrie KL, Winter R, Kishor S. Spousal violence in Sub-Saharan Africa: structure, forms, and levels, in population association of America. Annual Meeting. Boston, MA; 2014.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Filmer D, Pritchett L. Estimating wealth effect without expenditure data or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography. 2001;38:115–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Raghunathan TE, Lepkowski JM, Van Hoewyk J, Solenberger, P. A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Surv Methodol. 2001;27(1):85–95.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 11. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2009.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shamu S, et al. Intimate partner violence after disclosure of HIV test results among pregnant women in Harare, Zimbabwe. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e109447.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kiula ES, Damian DJ, Msuya SE. Predictors of HIV serostatus disclosure to partners among HIV-positive pregnant women in Morogoro, Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:433.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Antelman G, et al. Predictors of HIV-1 serostatus disclosure: a prospective study among HIV-infected pregnant women in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. AIDS. 2001;15(14):1865–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Walcott MM, et al. Facilitating HIV status disclosure for pregnant women and partners in rural Kenya: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Osoti AO, et al. Home visits during pregnancy enhance male partner HIV counselling and testing in Kenya: a randomized clinical trial. AIDS. 2014;28(1):95–103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hatcher AM, et al. Bidirectional links between HIV and intimate partner violence in pregnancy: implications for prevention of mother-to-child transmission. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17:19233.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maman S, et al. Diagnosis and disclosure of HIV status: implications for women’s risk of physical partner violence in the postpartum period. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;72(5):546–51.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kennedy CE, et al. Safer disclosure of HIV serostatus for women living with HIV who experience or fear violence: a systematic review. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18(6 Suppl 5):20292.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wagman JA, et al. Effectiveness of an integrated intimate partner violence and HIV prevention intervention in Rakai, Uganda: analysis of an intervention in an existing cluster randomised cohort. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(1):e23–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Maman S, et al. Efficacy of enhanced HIV counseling for risk reduction during pregnancy and in the postpartum period: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(5):e97092.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jasseron C, et al. Non-disclosure of a pregnant woman’s HIV status to her partner is associated with non-optimal prevention of mother-to-child transmission. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(2):488–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen M. Hampanda
    • 1
    • 3
  • Christine Tagliaferri Rael
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public HealthUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAuroraUSA
  2. 2.Division of Gender, Sexuality and Health, HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies at the New York State Psychiatric InstituteColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Center for Global HealthUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAuroraUSA

Personalised recommendations