Memory Impairment in HIV-Infected Individuals with Early and Late Initiation of Regular Marijuana Use
Marijuana use is disproportionately prevalent among HIV-infected individuals. The strongest neurocognitive effect of marijuana use is impairment in the domain of memory. Memory impairment is also high among HIV-infected persons. The present study examined 69 HIV-infected individuals who were stratified by age of regular marijuana initiation to investigate how marijuana use impacts neurocognitive functioning. A comprehensive battery assessed substance use and neurocognitive functioning. Findings indicated early onset marijuana users (regular use prior to age 18), compared to non-marijuana users and late onset marijuana users (regular use at age 18 or later), were over 8 times more likely to have learning impairment and nearly 4 times more likely to have memory impairment. A similar pattern of early onset marijuana users performing worse in learning emerged when examining domain deficit scores. The potential for early onset of regular marijuana use to exacerbate already high levels of memory impairment among HIV-infected persons has important clinical implications, including increased potential for medication non-adherence and difficulty with independent living.
KeywordsMarijuana Cannabis HIV/AIDS Memory Neurocognitive functioning
This study was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (F31-DA035131, K23-DA028660, & R03-DA035670), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32-AI007392), & the Duke Center for AIDS Research (P30-AI064518).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Mimiaga MJ, Reisner SL, Grasso C, et al. Substance use among HIV-infected patients engaged in primary care in the United States: findings from the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems cohort. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(8):1457–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 2.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Behavioral health trends in the United States: results from the 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Rockville: SAMHSA; 2015.Google Scholar
- 5.National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. State laws: medicinal marijuana. 2017; http://norml.org/legal/medical-marijuana-2. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
- 14.Wright MJ, Woo E, Foley J, et al. Antiretroviral adherence and the nature of HIV-associated verbal memory impairment. Am Neuropsych Assoc. 2011;23(3):324–31.Google Scholar
- 30.Solowij N, Pesa N. Cannabis and cognition: short- and long-term effects. In: Castle D, Murray R, D’Souza D, editors. Marijuana and madness. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.Google Scholar
- 47.APA. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fourth Edition, text revision. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.Google Scholar
- 48.Wechsler D. Wechsler test of adult reading (WTAR) manual. San Antonio: Harcourt Assessment; 2001.Google Scholar
- 49.Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline Follow-back user’s guide: a calendar method for assessing alcohol and drug use. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation; 1996.Google Scholar
- 50.NIAAA. The physician’s guide to helping patients with alcohol problems. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health; 1995.Google Scholar
- 51.McGahan PL, Griffith JA, Parente R, McLellan AT. Addiction severity index composite scores manual. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania/Veterans Administration Center for Studies of Addiction; 1986.Google Scholar
- 52.First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders, research version, patient/non-patient edition. New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute; 1996.Google Scholar
- 54.Derogatis LR. Brief Symptom Inventory: administration, scoring, and procedures manual. 3rd ed. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems, Inc.; 1993.Google Scholar
- 55.Brandt J, Benedict RHB. Hopkins verbal learning test—revised professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc; 2001.Google Scholar
- 56.Benedict RHB. Brief visuospatial memory test-revised professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.; 1997.Google Scholar
- 57.Lezac MD. Neuropsychological assessment. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.Google Scholar
- 58.Golden CJ. Stroop color and word test. Chicago: Stoelting; 1978.Google Scholar
- 59.Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition: Administration and Scoring Manual. San Antonio: Harcourt Brace; 1997.Google Scholar
- 60.Heaton RK, Grant I, Matthews CG. Comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery: demographic corrections, research findings, and clinical applications. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1991.Google Scholar
- 61.Benton A, Hamsher K, Sivan A. Multilingual aphasia examination. 3rd ed. Iowa City: AJA Associates; 1983.Google Scholar
- 63.Stern RA, White T. Neuropsychological assessment battery: administration, scoring, and interpretation manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc; 2003.Google Scholar
- 64.Diehr MC, Cherner M, Wolfson TJ, Miller SW, Grant I, Heaton RK. The 50 and 100-item short forms of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT): demographically corrected norms and comparisons with the full PASAT in normal and clinical samples. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003;25(4):571–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 65.Heaton RK, Miller SW, Taylor MJ, Grant I. Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery: demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc; 2004.Google Scholar
- 66.Norman MA, Moore DJ, Taylor M, et al. Demographically corrected norms for African Americans and Caucasians on the hopkins verbal learning test-revised, brief visuospatial memory test-revised, stroop color and word test, and wisconsin card sorting test 64-card version. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011;33(7):793–804.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 67.Stern RA, White T. NAB digits forward/digits backward test: professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. (PAR); 2009.Google Scholar