AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 22, Issue 7, pp 2104–2112 | Cite as

Surveillance Among Men Who have Sex with Men in the United States: A Comparison of Web-Based and Venue-Based Samples

  • Yen-Tyng Chen
  • Kristina Bowles
  • Qian An
  • Elizabeth DiNenno
  • Teresa Finlayson
  • Brooke Hoots
  • Gabriela Paz-Bailey
  • Cyprian Wejnert
Original Paper


Although men who have sex with men (MSM) recruited through web-based and venue-based sampling methods have been compared, no large web-based and venue-based samples using similar survey instruments have been examined in the U.S. This study describes the differences in sociodemographic characteristics and risk behaviors between the 2012 Web-based HIV Behavioral Survey (n = 3221) and 2011 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (n = 9256). Compared with participants in the venue-based sample, participants in the web-based sample were older, less likely to be black or Hispanic, more likely to have higher socioeconomic status, and more likely to have anal sex without a condom with their last male sex partner. Web-based participants were less likely to have multiple male sex partners, ever injected drugs, been tested for HIV in the past 12 months, and received free condoms than venue-based participants. The method for sampling MSM into a behavioral survey should consider the sub-population of MSM to be reached.


MSM Internet HIV Behavioral surveillance Sampling 



This research was supported in part by an appointment to the Research Participation Program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and CDC. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


The study was funded by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Grant Number: RFA-PS11-001 and 200-2010-37417).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participates were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Sullivan PS, Hamouda O, Delpech V, et al. Reemergence of the HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men in North America, Western Europe, and Australia, 1996–2005. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19(6):423–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    CDC. Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas, 2014. HIV Surveillance Report. 2015;26.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    CDC. Diagnoses of HIV Infection in the United States and dependent areas, 2015. HIV Surveillance Report. 2016;27.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wejnert C, Hess KL, Rose CE, Balaji A, Smith JC, Paz-Bailey G. Age-specific race and ethnicity disparities in HIV infection and awareness among men who have sex with men—20 US cities, 2008–2014. J Infect Dis. 2016;213(5):776–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    CDC. Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2007–2010. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report. 2012;17 (No. 14).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CDC. Social determinants of health among adults with diagnosed HIV in 11 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, 2014. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report. 2016;21(No. 6).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gallagher KM, Sullivan PS, Lansky A, Onorato IM. Behavioral surveillance among people at risk for HIV infection in the U.S.: the national HIV behavioral surveillance system. Public Health Rep. 2007;122(Suppl. 1):32–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paz-Bailey G, Raymond HF, Lansky A, Mermin J. Using the national HIV behavioral surveillance system to inform HIV prevention efforts in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(3):233–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    CDC. HIV infection risk, prevention, and testing behaviors among men who have sex with men—national HIV behavioral surveillance, 20 U.S. cities, 2014. HIV Surveillance Special Report. 2016;15.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ross MW, Tikkanen R, Månsson S-A. Differences between Internet samples and conventional samples of men who have sex with men: implications for research and HIV interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(5):749–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Benotsch EG, Kalichman S, Cage M. Men who have met sex partners via the Internet: Prevalence, predictors, and implications for HIV prevention. Arch Sex Behav. 2002;31(2):177–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liau A, Millett G, Marks G. Meta-analytic examination of online sex-seeking and sexual risk behavior among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33(9):576–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang D, Bi P, Hiller JE, Lv F. Web-based HIV/AIDS behavioral surveillance among men who have sex with men: potential and challenges. Int J Infect Dis. 2008;12(2):126–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sanchez T, Smith A, Denson D, Dinenno E, Lansky A. Internet-based methods may reach higher-risk men who have sex with men not reached through venue-based sampling. Open AIDS J. 2012;6:83–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grov C, Hirshfield S, Remien RH, Humberstone M, Chiasson MA. Exploring the venue’s role in risky sexual behavior among gay and bisexual men: an event-level analysis from a national online survey in the U.S. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(2):291–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saxton P, Dickson N, Hughes A. Who is omitted from repeated offline HIV behavioural surveillance among MSM? Implications for interpreting trends. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(9):3133–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saxton PJ, Dickson NP, Hughes AJ. Trends in web-based HIV behavioural surveillance among gay and bisexual men in New Zealand: complementing location-based surveillance. AIDS Care. 2015;27(6):762–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parsons JT, Vial AC, Starks TJ, Golub SA. Recruiting drug using men who have sex with men in behavioral intervention trials: a comparison of internet and field-based strategies. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(2):688–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Evans AR, Wiggins RD, Mercer CH, Bolding GJ, Elford J. Men who have sex with men in Great Britain: comparison of a self-selected internet sample with a national probability sample. Sex Transm Infect. 2007;83(3):200–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shi LE, Wei C, McFarland W, Yan H, Li J, Raymond HF. Comparing samples of men who have sex with men recruited online and in venues, Jiangsu Province, China, 2013. LGBT Health. 2016;3(3):238–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Elford J, Bolding G, Davis M, Sherr L, Hart G. Web-based behavioral surveillance among men who have sex with men: a comparison of online and offline samples in London, UK. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35(4):421–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rhodes SD, DiClemente RJ, Cecil H, Hergenrather KC, Yee LJ. Risk among men who have sex with men in the United States: a comparison of an Internet sample and a conventional outreach sample. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002;14(1):41–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tsui HY, Lau JT. Comparison of risk behaviors and socio-cultural profile of men who have sex with men survey respondents recruited via venues and the internet. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    CDC. A web-based survey of HIV testing and risk behaviors among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men—United States, 2012. HIV Surveillance Special Reports. 2016;14 (revised edition).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Finlayson TJ, Le B, Smith A, et al. HIV risk, prevention, and testing behaviors among men who have sex with men—national HIV behavioral surveillance system, 21 U.S. cities, United States, 2008. MMWR. 2011;60(14):1–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    CDC. HIV risk, prevention, and testing behaviors—national HIV behavioral surveillance system: men who have sex with men 20 U.S. Cities, 2011. HIV Surveillance Special Report. 2014;8.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Millett GA, Crowley JS, Koh H, et al. A way forward: the National HIV/AIDS Strategy and reducing HIV incidence in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;55:S144–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sanchez TH, Sineath RC, Kahle EM, Tregear SJ, Sullivan PS. The annual American men’s internet survey of behaviors of men who have sex with men in the United States: protocol and key indicators report 2013. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2015;. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.5476.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chapin-Bardales J, Sanchez T, Paz-Bailey G, et al. Factors associated with recent human immunodeficiency virus testing among men who have sex with men in Puerto Rico, national human immunodeficiency virus behavioral surveillance system, 2011. Sex Transm Dis. 2016;43(6):346–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Du Bois SN, Johnson SE, Mustanski B. Examining racial and ethnic minority differences among YMSM during recruitment for an online HIV prevention intervention study. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(6):1430–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pequegnat W, Rosser BRS, Bowen AM, et al. Conducting internet-based HIV/STD prevention survey research: considerations in design and evaluation. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(4):505–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McFarlane M, Kachur R, Klausner JD, Roland E, Cohen M. Internet-based health promotion and disease control in the 8 cities: successes, barriers, and future plans. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32:S60–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Abara WE, Oraka E, Jeffries WL, Chavez P, Nasrullah M, DiNenno E. Prevalence and correlates of condom use among sexually active men who have sex with men in the United States: findings from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2002, 2006–10 and 2011–13. Sex Health. 2017;. doi: 10.1071/SH16034.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vial AC, Starks TJ, Parsons JT. Relative efficiency of field and online strategies in the recruitment of HIV-positive men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2015;27(2):103–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Horvath KJ, Rosser BR, Remafedi G. Sexual risk taking among young internet-using men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(6):1059–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Patchin JW, Hinduja S. Changes in adolescent online social networking behaviors from 2006 to 2009. Comput Human Behav. 2010;26(6):1818–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lenhart A, Purcell K, Smith A, Zickuhr K. Social media and mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2010;3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (outside the USA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yen-Tyng Chen
    • 1
  • Kristina Bowles
    • 1
  • Qian An
    • 1
  • Elizabeth DiNenno
    • 1
  • Teresa Finlayson
    • 1
  • Brooke Hoots
    • 1
  • Gabriela Paz-Bailey
    • 1
  • Cyprian Wejnert
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB PreventionCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations