Abstract
This study compared the profile of those who, after initial failure to be selected, choose to reapply to study medicine with those who did not reapply. It also evaluates the chance of a successful outcome for re-applicants. In 2013, 4007 applicants to undergraduate medical schools in the largest state in Australia were unsuccessful. Those who chose to reapply (n = 665) were compared to those who did not reapply (n = 3342). Results showed that the odds of re-applying to medicine were 55% less for those from rural areas, and 39% more for those from academically-selective schools. Those who had higher cognitive ability and high school academic performance scores in 2013 were also more likely to re-apply. Socioeconomic status was not related to re-application choice. Re-applicants’ showed significant improvements in selection test scores and had a 34% greater probability of selection than first-time applicants who were also interviewed in the same selection round. The findings of this study indicate that re-testing and re-application improves one’s chance of selection into an undergraduate medical degree, but may further reduce the diversity of medical student cohorts in terms of rural background and educational background.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Government run high schools that admit students on the basis of their scores on a cognitive ability selection test. All other schools admit students from the full range of ability, with no selection testing. Selective schools therefore have students who typically obtain high ATAR scores at the end of their high school education, but the curriculum is the same as that in all other government and private high schools.
References
Andrich, D., Styles, I., Mercer, A., & Puddey, I. B. (2017). On the validity of repeated assessments in the UMAT, a high-stakes admissions test. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22, 1245–1262.
Australian Bureau of Statistics, (ABS). (2013). 2033.0.55.001—Census of population and housing: Socio-Economic indexes for areas (SEIFA), Australia, 2011. Retrieved January 15, 2018, from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/2033.0.55.0012011?OpenDocument.
Barron, L. G., Randall, J. G., Trent, J. D., Johnson, J. F., & Villado, A. J. (2017). Big Five traits: Predictors of retesting propensity and score improvement. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(2), 138–148.
Baxter, J., Hayes, A., & Gray, M. (2011). Families in regional, rural and remote Australia. Australian Government Report accessed February 12, 2018 from https://aifs.gov.au/publications/families-regional-rural-and-remote-australia.
Department of Health (Australia). (2017). Doctor connect. Retrieved September 1, 2017, from http://www.doctorconnect.gov.au/internet/otd/publishing.nsf/Content/ASGSRA_locator.
Griffin, B., Bayl-Smith, P., & Hu, W. (2018). Predicting patterns of change and stability in student performance across a medical degree. Medical Education, 52(4), 438–446.
Griffin, B., Carless, S., & Wilson, I. (2013). The undergraduate medical and health sciences admissions test: What is it measuring? Medical Teacher, 35, 727–730.
Griffin, B., & Hu, W. (2015). The interaction of socio-economic status and gender in widening participation in medicine. Medical Education, 49, 103–113.
Hausknecht, J. P. (2010). Candidate persistence and personality test practice effects: Implications for staffing system management. Personnel Psychology, 63(2), 299–324.
Hausknecht, J. P., Halpert, J. A., Di Paolo, N. T., & Moriarty Gerrard, M. O. (2007). Retesting in selection: A meta-analysis of coaching and practice effects for tests of cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 373–385.
Hay, M., Mercer, A. M., Lichtwark, I., Tran, S., Hodgson, W. C., Aretz, H. T., et al. (2017). Selecting for a sustainable workforce to meet the future healthcare needs of rural communities in Australia. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22, 533–551.
Ho, C. (2017). Selective schools increasingly cater to the most advantaged students. Retrieved March 9, 2017, from https://theconversation.com/selective-schools-increasingly-cater-to-the-most-advantaged-students-74151.
Jones, M., Humphreys, J., & Prideaux, D. (2009). Predicting medical students’ intentions to take up rural practice after graduation. Medical Education, 43, 1001–1009.
Koenig, J. A., & Leger, K. F. (1997). A comparison of retest performances and test-preparation methods for MCAT examinees grouped by gender and race-ethnicity. Academic Medicine, 72(10, Suppl 1), S100–S102.
Lievens, F., Buyse, T., & Sackett, P. R. (2005). Retest effects in operational selection settings: Development and test of a framework. Personnel Psychology, 58, 981–1007.
Lievens, F., Reeve, C. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (2007). An examination of psychometric bias due to retesting on cognitive ability tests in selection settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1672–1682.
Mercer, A., & Chiavaroli, N. (2006). UMAT: A Validity Study. A review of the underlying constructs and an analysis of the content of the Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test.; a report prepared for the UMAT Consortium.
Nicholson, S., & Cleland, J. (2015). Reframing research on widening participation in medical education: Using theory to inform practice. In J. Cleland & S. J. Durning (Eds.), Researching medical education (pp. 231–242). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Nicholson, S., & Cleland, J. A. (2017). “It’s making contacts”: Notions of social capital and implications for widening access to medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22, 477–490.
Olenick, J., Bhatia, S., & Ryan, A. M. (2016). Effects of g-loading and time lag on retesting in job selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 24, 324–336.
Puddey, I. B., Mercer, A., Andrich, D., & Styles, I. (2014). Practice effects in medical school entrance testing with the undergraduate medicine and health sciences admission test (UMAT). BMC Medical Education, 14, 48.
Richardson, S., & Friedman, T. (2010). Australian Regional Higher Educatio: Student characteristics and experiences. Report produced by the Austtralia Council for Educational Research Ltd.
Robb, N., Dunkley, L., Boynton, P., & Greenhalgh, T. (2007). Looking for a better future: Identity construction in socio-economically deprived 16-year olds considering a career in medicine. Social Science and Medicine, 65, 738–754.
Schleicher, D. J., Van Iddekinge, C. H., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2010). If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again: Understanding race, age, and gender differences in retesting score improvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 603–617.
van Iddekinge, C. H., & Arnold, J. D. (2017). Retaking employment tests: What we know and what we still need to know. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 445–471.
van Iddekinge, C. H., Morgeson, F. P., Schleicher, D. J., & Campion, M. A. (2011). Can I retake it? Exploring subgroup differences and criterion-related validity in promotion retesting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 941–955.
Watson, J., Wright, S., Hay, I., Beswick, K., Allen, J., & Cranston, N. (2016). Rural and regional students’ perceptions of schooling and factors that influence their aspirations. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 26(2), 4–18.
Zhao, X., Oppler, S., Dunleavy, D., & Kroopnick, M. (2010). Validity of four approaches of using repeaters’ MCAT scores in medical school admissions to predict USMLE Step 1 total scores. Academic Medicine, 85(10), S64–S67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Griffin, B., Auton, J., Duvivier, R. et al. Applicants to medical school: if at first they don’t succeed, who tries again and are they successful?. Adv in Health Sci Educ 24, 33–43 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9847-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9847-9