Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 241–247 | Cite as

The grades that clinical teachers give students modifies the grades they receive

  • Michael Paget
  • Gurbir Brar
  • Pamela Veale
  • Kevin Busche
  • Sylvain Coderre
  • Wayne Woloschuk
  • Kevin McLaughlin
Article

Abstract

Prior studies have shown a correlation between the grades students receive and how they rate their teacher in the classroom. In this study, the authors probe this association on clinical rotations and explore potential mechanisms. All In-Training Evaluation Reports (ITERs) for students on mandatory clerkship rotations from April 1, 2013 to January 31, 2015 were matched with the corresponding student’s rating of their teacher (SRT). The date and time that ITERs and SRTs were submitted was used to divide SRTs into those submitted before versus after the corresponding ITER was submitted. Multilevel, mixed effects linear regression was used to examine the association between SRT, ITER rating, and whether the ITER was submitted before or after SRT. Of 2373 paired evaluations, 1098 (46.3%) SRT were submitted before the teacher had submitted the ITER. There was a significant interaction between explanatory variables: when ITER ratings had not yet been submitted, the regression coefficient for this association was 0.25 (95% confidence interval [0.17, 0.33], p < 0.001), whereas the regression coefficient was significantly higher when ITER ratings were submitted prior to SRT (0.40 [0.31, 0.49], p < 0.001). Finding an association between SRT and ITER when students do not know their ITER ratings suggests that SRTs can capture attributes of effective teaching, but the effect modification when students have access to their ITER rating supports grade satisfaction bias. Further studies are needed to explain the mechanism of grade satisfaction and to identify other biases that may impact the validity of SRT.

Keywords

Student’s rating of their teacher In-training evaluation report Grade satisfaction 

References

  1. Anikeeff, A. M. (1953). Factors affecting student evaluation of college faculty members. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37, 458–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkowitz, L., & Troccoli, B. T. (1990). Feelings, direction of attention, and expressed evaluation of others. Cognition Emotion, 4, 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boring, A., Ottoboni, K., & Stark, P. B. (2016). Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness. Retrieved from Science Open Research. doi: 10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-EDU.AETBZC.v1.Google Scholar
  4. Elster, J. (1983). Sour grapes: Studies in the subversion of rationality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Erber, R. (1991). Affective and semantic priming: Effects of mood on category accessibility and inference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 480–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feldman, K. A. (1976). Grades and college students’ evaluations of their courses and teachers. Research in Higher Education, 4, 69–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Festinger, L. (1962). Cognitive dissonance. Scientific American, 207, 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frank, J. R. (2005). The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better care. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.Google Scholar
  9. Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist, 52, 1209–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haws, J., Rannelli, L., Schaefer, J. P., Zarnke, K., Coderre, S., Ravani, P., et al. (2016). The attributes of an effective teacher differ between the classroom and the clinical setting. Advances in Health Science Education Theory and Practice, 21, 833–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hornstein, H. A. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance. Cogent Education, 4, 1304016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howard, G. S., & Maxwell, S. E. (1980). The correlation between grades and student satisfaction: a case of mistaken causation? Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 810–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Howard, G. S., & Maxwell, S. E. (1982). Do grades contaminate student evaluations of instruction? Research in Higher Education, 16, 175–187. https://calgary.one45.com/
  14. Isaacson, R. L., McKeachie, W. J., Milholland, J. E., Lin, Y. G., Hofeller, M., Baerwaldt, J. W., et al. (1964). Dimensions of student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 344–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McKeachie, W. J., Lin, Y. G., & Mann, W. (1971). Student ratings of teacher effectiveness: Validity studies. American Educational Research Journal, 8, 435–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McLaughlin, K., Bates, J., Konkin, J., Woloschuk, W., Suddards, C. A., & Regehr, G. (2011). A comparison of performance evaluations of students on longitudinal integrated clerkships and rotation-based clerkships. Academic Medicine, 86(Suppl), S25–S29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Powell, R. W. (1977). Grades, learning, and student evaluation of instruction. Research in Higher Education, 7, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pratt, M., & Pratt, T. A. E. C. (1976). A study of student-teacher grading interaction process. Improving College and University Teaching, 24, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rannelli, L., Coderre, S., Paget, M., Woloschuk, W., Wright, B., & McLaughlin, K. (2014). How do medical students form impressions of the effectiveness of classroom teachers? Medical Education, 48, 831–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Snyder, C. R., & Clair, M. (1976). Effects of expected and obtained grades on teacher evaluation and attribution of performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sutkin, G., Wagner, E., Harris, I., & Schiffer, R. (2008). What makes a good clinical teacher in medicine? A review of literature. Academic Medicine, 83, 452–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Office of Undergraduate Medical Education, Health Sciences CentreUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations