Nutritional evaluation of selected fodder trees: Mulberry (Molus alba Lam.), Leucaena (Leucaena luecocephala Lam de Wit.) and Moringa (Moringa oleifera Lam.) as dry season protein supplements for grazing animals

Abstract

Leaves of Mulberry (Morus alba Lam.), Leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala Lam de wit.) and Moringa (Moringa oleifera Lam.) were evaluated as dry season protein supplements for grazing animals based on chemical composition, in vitro and in sacco nutrient digestibility and a Rabbit feeding trial. All tree fodder forages had similar dry matter (DM) content, but crude protein was higher in Moringa (28.6%) followed by Leucaena (24.5%), Mulberry (24.1%) and Lucerne (18.0%). Ash content was highest in Mulberry followed by Moringa and Lucerne with Leucaena having lowest amounts. Polyphenols ranged from 2.72 to 3.64%, with Leucaena having highest and Mulberry lowest amounts. Dietary fibre were highest in Mulberry and Moringa, but there were no significant differences (P < 0.05) between Leucaena and Lucerne. In vitro gas production and DM disappearances were higher in Moringa followed by Mulberry and Lucerne with Leucaena having lowest amounts. Except for Leucaena, DM disappearances were increased when rumen fluid from dairy cattle steers was used. In sacco DM disappearances were 33.7% for Leucaena, 78.2% for Lucerne, 50.2% for Moringa and 50.7% for Mulberry. In vitro and in sacco crude fibre and neutral detergent fibre disappearances were relatively lower, but reflected DM disappearances. The Rabbit feeding trial showed diets based on Moringa, Leucaena and combined fodder forages to have significantly better performance than Mulberry and grass hay alone. The conclusion was that tested tree fodder forages have potential of being used as dry season protein supplements for grazing animals on traditional smallholder farms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. AOAC (1990) Official methods of analysis, 15th edn. Association of Official Methods of Analysis, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balgees A, Elmnan A, Fadal Elseed AMA, Mahala AG, Masiab EO (2013) In situ degradability and in vitro gas production of selected multipurpose tree leaves and alfalfa as ruminant feeds. World’s Vet J 3(2):46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chibinga OC, Musimba NRK, Nyangito Moses MM, Simbaya J, Daura MT (2012) Chemical composition and in vitro dry matter digestibility of leaves of Julbernardia globiflora. Res J Anim Sci 6(2):30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Devendra C (2011) Crop-residues for feeding animals in Asia: Technology development and adoption in crop/livestock systems. Available online at https://www.ilri.org.inforserv/webpub/fulldocs/X5454e.htm.

  5. Franzel S, Carsan S, Lukuyu B, Sinja J, Wambugu C (2014) Fodder trees for improving livestock productivity and smallholder livelihoods in Africa. Current Opt Environ Stab 6:98–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gebeyew K, Beriso K, Mohamed A, Silassie G, Melaku S, Worku A (2015) Review on the nutritive value of some selected Acacia species for livestock production in dry land areas. J Adv Dairy Res 3(2):1000139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Girma M, Animut G, Assefa G (2015) Chemical composition and in vitro organic matter digestibility of major indigenous fodder trees and shrubs in Northeastern drylands of Ethiopia. Livestock Res Rural Dev 27, Article #26. Retrieved 19 Dec 2018, from https://www.lrrd.org/lrrd27/2/girm27026.htm

  8. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and applications). In: Agriculture Handbook 379. ARA-USDA, Washington DC

  9. Jetana TC, Vongpipatana S, Thongruay S, Usawang S, Sophon S (2010) Apparent digestibility, nitrogen balance, ruminal microbial nitrogen production and blood metabolites in Thai Brahman cattle fed a basal diet of rice straw and supplemented with some tropical protein rich trees. Asian-Austr J Anim Sci 23(4):465–474

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kandylis K, Hadjigeorgiou I, Harizanis P (2009) The nutritive value of mulberry leaves (Morus alba) as a feed supplement for sheep. Trop Anim Health Prod 41:17–24

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Leng AR (1990) Factors affecting the utilization of poor quality forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutr Res Rev 3:277–303

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maasdorp BV, Muchenje V, Titterton M (1999) Palatability and effect on dairy cow milk yield of dried fodder from the forage trees Acacia bolivana, Calliandra calothusus and Leucaena leucocephala. Anim Feed Sci Technol 77:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahipala MBP, Krebs GL, McCafferty P, Guneratne LHP (2009) Chemical composition, biological effects of tannins and in vitro nutritive value of selected browse species grown in the West Australian Mediterranean environment. Anim Feed Sci Technol 153:203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Makkar HPS (2003) Quantification of tannins in tree and shrub foliage. A laboratory manual. In: Joint FAO/IAEA Division of nuclear techniques in food and agriculture. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrect.

  15. Makkar HPS, Becker K (1996) A bioassay for polyphenols (tannins). In: Polyphenols Communications, vol 96, Bordenaux, France. July 15–18, 1996

  16. Menke KH, Steingass H (1988) Estimation of energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Dev 28:7–55

    Google Scholar 

  17. McSweeney CS, Palmer B, McNiell DM, Krause DO (2001) Microbial interactions with tannins: nutritional consequences for ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol 91:83–93

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mongeau R, Brassard R (1979) Determination of neutral detergent fibre, hemicelluloses, cellulose and lignin in breads. Cereal Chem 56(5):437–441

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mtui DJ, Lekule FP, Shem MN, Hayashida M, Fugihara T (2008) Mineral concentration in leaves of nine browse species collected from Mvomero, Morogoro. Tanzania J Food Agric Environ 6(3–4):226–230

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ndlovu LR and Sibanda LM (1993) Improving the productivity of indigenous goats in Zimbabwe. In: Improving the productivity of indigenous -708African livestock. TECDOC-708, IAEA, Vienna. pp 91–102

  21. Noula FS, Akibamijo OO, Aduwumi A, Hoffman E, Muetzel S, Becker K (2006) The influence of Moringa oleifera leaves as substitute to conventional concentrate on the in vitro gas production and digestibility of ground nut hay. Livestock Res Rural Dev 18(9):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  22. Piñeiro-Vázquez AT, Jimenez-Ferre GO, Chay-Canul AJ, Casanova-Lugo F, Diaz-Echeverria VF, Ayala-Burgos AJ, Solrio-Sanchaz FJ, Aguilar-Perez CF, Ku-Vera JC (2017) Intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance and energy utilization in heifers fed low quality forage and Leucaena leucocephal. Anim Feed Sci Technol 228:194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rubanza CDK, Shem MN, Otsyina R, Ichinohe T, Fujihara T (2003) Nutritive value of some browse tree legume foliages native to Semi-arid areas in Western Tanzania. Asian-Austr J Anim Sci 16(10):1429–1437

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sánchez MD (2000) Mulberry an exceptional forage available almost worldwide. Animal Production and Health Division. FAO, Rome, Italy. World Animal Review, 91.1

  25. Sanon HO, Kaboré-Zoungrana C, Ledin I (2008) Nutritive value and feed intake by goats of three browse fodder species in the Sahalian zone of West Africa. Anim Feed Sci Technol 144:97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animfeedsci.2007.10.004

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Selemani IS, Eik LO, Holand Ø, Ådnøy T, Mtengeti E, Mushi D (2013) Variation in quantity and quality of native forages and grazing behaviour of cattle and goats in Tanzania. Liv Sci 157:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Simbaya J (2002) Potential of fodder/shrub legumes as a feed resource for dry season supplementation of smallholder ruminant animals. In: Development and field evaluation of animal feed supplementation packages. IAEA-TECDOC 1294, Vienna

  28. Singh S, Kundu SS (2010) Intake nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation and water kinetics of sheep fed Dichanthium annulatum grass hay-tree leaves diets. Liv Res Rural Dev 22:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  29. Topps JH (1992) Potential composition and use of legume shrubs and trees as fodder for livestock in the tropics. J Agric Sci 118:1–8

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Waghorn G (2008) Beneficial and detrimental effects of dietary condensed tannins for sustainable sheep and goat production—progress and challenges. Anim Feed Sci Technol 147:116–169

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Weldegebriel B, Kebede K, Hayyelom M (2014) Effect of feeding acacia pods (Acacia seyel) with or without wheat bran on feed intake and digestibility of Tigray highland sheep in hay based feed. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. Vol. 4, No. 17. ISSN 2224-3208 (Paper) ISSN 2225-093X (online). www.iiste.org.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research team would like to acknowledge the University of Zambia in general and the School of Agricultural Sciences in particular, for the chance and support to undertake this research. The involvement of undergraduate students Ms. Sendy Kaonga and Mr. Jeremiah Kabwe in the collection of data is acknowledged and greatly appreciated. Technical personnel in the laboratory are acknowledged for undertaking chemical composition analysis and digestibility assays. Personnel at the field station are acknowledged for feeding and taking care of experimental animals. Funding on this project was through a Technical Cooperation Project (ZAM5028) supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Support from the Agency through purchase of equipment and chemical reagents is highly appreciated. Local farmers are acknowledge for supply of experimental material and their wise council.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Joseph Simbaya or Abdelfattah Z. M. Salem.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simbaya, J., Chibinga, O. & Salem, A.Z.M. Nutritional evaluation of selected fodder trees: Mulberry (Molus alba Lam.), Leucaena (Leucaena luecocephala Lam de Wit.) and Moringa (Moringa oleifera Lam.) as dry season protein supplements for grazing animals. Agroforest Syst (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00504-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Moringa
  • Leucaena
  • Mulberry fodder trees
  • In vitro gas production
  • DM and NDF degradations
  • Rabbit performance