Abstract
Agroforestry understood as the combination of a woody component (forest tree, shrub, fruit tree) with an agricultural use of the understory is not clearly identified as such by the European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Despite the protection and promotion of the woody component in different parts of the CAP political text, the identification of agroforestry is not clear, although it can be recognised in the description of some landscape features, such as isolated trees and different types of hedgerows. Moreover, it is important to identify the extent of such woody components promoted by the CAP in agricultural lands to validate the impact of current and future measures. This paper aims at the characterisation of the current extent of landscape features all over Europe by analysing the Rural Development Program (RDP) measures within the CAP 2007–2013 and 2014–2020 that promote said features in Europe to increase the ecosystem service delivery. Isolated trees and hedgerows are protected unsatisfactorily through the Cross-compliance and Greening of CAP Pillar I. In contrast, Agri-environment measures associated to Pillar II are used in most European countries to protect both isolated trees and hedgerows and to promote them as boundary elements. The promotion of hedgerows and isolated trees mainly related to silvoarable and silvopastoral agroforestry practices is aimed at the promotion of the ecosystem services (such as water protection and biodiversity) and improvement in resilience (such as adaptation to climate change) they provide; therefore, the agroforestry environment benefits are indeed recognised. Landscape features comprising woody perennials should be associated with agroforestry when present in arable and permanent grasslands.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
DEFRA (1997) Hedgerow regulation. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/1160/regulation/6/made. Accessed 23 Jan 2018
European Court of Auditors (2009) European Court of Auditors special report 8/2008: “is cross compliance an effective policy?” http://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/SR08_08/SR08_08_EN.PDF. Accessed 23 Jan 2018
European Environment Agency (2012) Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): consultation on version 4, August–December 2012 http://test.matth.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2012/07/CICES-V43_Revised-Final_Report_29012013.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2018
EUROSAT (2016) http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:Land_use/cover_area_frame_survey_(LUCAS)&redirect=no. Accessed 23 Jan 2018
EUROSTAT (2012) LUCAS micro data 2012. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lucas/data/primary-data/2012 Accessed 28 July 2017
EUROSTAT (2013) LUCAS 2012 (Land Use/Cover Area Frame Survey). Technical reference document: C-1 instructions for surveyors
FAO (2015). Advancing agroforestry on the policy agenda. A guide for decision-makers. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3182e.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2018
Kachova V, Hinkov G, Popov E, Trichkov L, Mosquera-Losada MR (2016) Agroforestry in Bulgaria: history, presence status and prospects. Agrofor Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-0029-6
Krčmářová J, Jeleček L, Trichkov L, Mosquera-Losada MR (2016) Czech traditional agroforestry: historic accounts and current status. Agrofor Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9985-0
Mosquera-Losada MR, Nair PK (2016) Agroforestry and good governance: a comparison of the agroforestry policy frameworks in the EU and the USA
Mosquera-Losada MR, Santiago Freijanes JJ, Pisanelli A, Rois M, Smith J, den Herder M, Moreno G, Malignier N, Mirazo JR, Lamersdorf N, Ferreiro Domínguez N, Balaguer F, Pantera A, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, Gonzalez-Hernández P, Fernández-Lorenzo JL, Romero-Franco R, Chalmin A, Garcia de Jalon S, Garnett K, Graves A, Burgess PJ (2016) Extent and success of current policy measures to promote agroforestry across Europe. https://www.agforward.eu/index.php/en/extent-and-success-of-current-policy-measures-to-promote-agroforestry-across-europe.html. Accessed 23 Jan 2018
Nair PKR, Toth GG (2016) Measuring agricultural sustainability in agroforestry systems. In: Lal R, Kraybill D, Hansen D, Singh B, Mosogoya T, Eik L (eds) Climate change and multi-dimensional sustainability in African agriculture. Springer, Cham, pp 365–394
Place F, Ajayi OC, Torquebiau E, Detlefsen G, Gauthier M, Buttoud G (2012) Improved policies for facilitating the adoption of agroforestry. In: Koanga ML (ed) Agroforestry for biodiversity and ecosystem services—science and practice. InTech, Rijeka, pp 113–128. https://doi.org/10.5772/34524
UN (2015) United Nations, sustainable development goals. http://www.fao.org/sustainable-development-goals/en/. Accessed 23 Jan 2018
USDA (2011). USDA agroforestry strategic framework, Fiscal year 2011–2016. http://www.usda.gov/documents/AFStratFrame_FINAL-lr_6-3-11.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2018
USDA (2013) Agroforestry: USDA reports to America, Fiscal Years 2011–2012—comprehensive version. http://www.usda.gov/documents/usda-reports-to-america-comprehensive.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2018
Acknowledgement
We acknowledge the funding for this research from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme under Grant Agreement No. 613520 (Project AGFORWARD).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santiago-Freijanes, J.J., Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., Aldrey, J.A. et al. Understanding agroforestry practices in Europe through landscape features policy promotion. Agroforest Syst 92, 1105–1115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0212-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0212-z