Skip to main content
Log in

Development and Evaluation of the Disinhibited Social Engagement Scale (DSES): a Tool for Assessment and Guide for Counseling Practice

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disinhibited social engagement (DSE) has been highlighted as a salient issue impacting children from various life situations, such as adoption, foster care, and maltreatment. In tackling the twofold gap on knowledge and measurement of DSE, we developed the Disinhibited Social Engagement Scale (DSES) using parents of 88 internationally adopted children in the U.S. The final DSES is comprised of three evident factors: social discrimination and selectivity, physical and verbal closeness, and friendliness level. Findings of the study provide insights for counselors working with at-risk youth for DSE, including practical implications for assessment and counseling practice. The study also sheds light on future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, A. M. (2017). An integrated model for counselor social justice advocacy in child welfare. The Family Journal, 25, 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480717736061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Oxford, England. Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J., Espie, C., Duncan, B., & Minnis, H. (2009). A qualitative exploration of children’s understanding of indiscriminate friendliness. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 14, 595–618 doi: 0.1177/1359104509339137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A. (1990). Importance of expert judgment in content-related validity evidence. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 12, 659–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, J., Tarullo, A. R., & Gunnar, M. R. (2009). Disinhibited social behavior among internationally adopted children. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, K., Carter, M. C., Ames, E. W., & Morison, S. J. (1995). Attachment security and indiscriminate friendliness in children adopted from Romanian orphanages. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, K. (1998). A three year follow-up of attachment and indiscriminate friendliness in children adopted from Romanian orphanages. Child Development, 69, 1092–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7. Accessed May 2018.

  • Gleason, M. M., Fox, N. A., Drury, S., Smyke, A., Egger, H. L., Nelson, C. A., & Zeanah, C. H. (2011). Validity of evidence-derived criteria for reactive attachment disorder: Indiscriminately social/disinhibited and emotionally withdrawn/inhibited types. Journal of the American Academy of Children and Adolescent Psychiatry, 50, 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.12.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, M. M., Fox, N. A., Drury, S. S., Smyke, A. T., Nelson, C. A., & Zeanah, C. H. (2014). Indiscriminate behaviors in previously institutionalized young children. Pediatrics, 133, e657–e665. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-0212.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Henson, R., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, J., & Tizard, B. (1989). Social and family relationships of ex-institutional adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 77–97.

  • Hoyle, R. H. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis. In M. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. Liao (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social science research methods (Vol. 1, pp. 169–175). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial scale development: Sample size for pilot studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, H. (2013). Attachment and culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 175–194. doi: 0.1177/0022022112472253.

  • Lancaster, C., Ovrebo, E., & Zuckerman, S. (2017). Adoption counselors’ perspectives of counseling postadoptive families. Journal of Counseling & Development, 95, 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, J. M., Hostinar, C. E., Mliner, S. B., & Gunnar, M. R. (2014). Disinhibited social engagement in postinstitutionalized children: Differentiating normal from atypical behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000054.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, J. M., Koss, K. J., Doyle, G. M., & Gunnar, M. R. (2016). The course of early disinhibited social engagement among post-institutionalized adopted children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57, 1126–1134. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12606.s.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, D. M. (2009). Understanding and treating children who experience interpersonal maltreatment: Empirical findings. Journal of Counseling & Development, 87, 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2009.tb00569.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, S., Breivik, K., Heiervang, E. R., Havik, T., & Havik, O. E. (2016). Reactive attachment disorder and disinhibited social engagement disorder in school-aged foster children – A confirmatory approach to dimensional measures. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44, 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-015-0045-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, S., Monette, S., Egger, H., Breivik, K., Young, D., Davidson, C., & Minnis, H. (2018). Development and examination of the reactive attachment disorder and disinhibited social engagement disorder assessment interview. Assessment, 2018, 107319111879742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118797422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Fullenkamp, L. J., & Zimmer, D. M. (2018). Love seeking or attachment disorder: A holistic review on indiscriminate friendliness in adopted or maltreated children in the U.S. The Practitioner Scholar. Journal of Counseling and Professional Psychology, 7, 172–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Hazler, R. J. (2017). Variables associated with indiscriminate friendliness displayed by Chinese adoptees in U.S. families. The Family Journal, 25, 414–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480717731345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Li, D., & Xu, Y. (2017). Indiscriminate friendliness in children adopted from China to the United States: A mixed methods study. The Professional Counselor, 7, 208–222. https://doi.org/10.15241/yl.7.3.208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons-Ruth, K. (2015). Commentary: Should we move away from an attachment framework for understanding disinhibited social engagement disorder (DESD)? A commentary on Zeanah and Gleason (2015). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56, 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 611–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundfrom, D. J., Shaw, D. G., & Ke, T. L. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, T. G., Bredenkamp, D., & Rutter, M. (1999). Attachment disturbances and disorders in children exposed to early severe deprivation. Infant Mental Health Journal, 20, 10–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pears, K. C., Bruce, J., Fisher, P. A., & Kim, H. K. (2010). Indiscriminate friendliness in maltreated foster children. Child Maltreatment, 15, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559509337891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tizard, B., & Hodges, J. (1978). The effect of early institutional rearing on the development of eight year old children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 19, 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1978.tb00453.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tizard, B., & Rees, J. (1975). The effect of early institutional rearing on the behavior problems and affectional relationships of four-year-old children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs (2019). Intercountry Adoption Statistics. Retrieved from https://travel.state.gov/content/adoptionsabroad/en/about-us/statistics.html. Accessed April 2019.

  • van den Dries, L., Juffer, F., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Alink, L. R. A. (2012). Infants’ responsiveness, attachment, and indiscriminate friendliness after international adoption from institutions or foster care in China: Application of emotional availability scales to adoptive families. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579411000654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B., Brown, T., & Onsman, A. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Journal of Paramedicine, 8, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9, 79–94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeanah, C. H., & Gleason, M. M. (2015). Annual research review: Attachment disorders in early childhood-clinical presentation, causes, correlates, and treatment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56, 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeanah, C. H., Smyke, A. T., & Dumitrescu, A. (2002). Disturbances of attachment in young children: II. Indiscriminate behavior and institutional care. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 983–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeanah, C. H., Chesher, T., Boris, N. W., Walter, H. J., Bukstein, O. G., Bellonci, C., et al. (2016). Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with reactive attachment disorder and disinhibited social engagement disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 55, 990–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the experts who generously shared their expertise in reviewing items for the DSES. We would also like to express our sincere gratitude to Dr. Megan Gunnar’s adoption research lab for assisting us with participant recruitment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanhong Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3 The Final Disinhibited Social Engagement Scale (N = 26)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Tan, T.X., Li, D. et al. Development and Evaluation of the Disinhibited Social Engagement Scale (DSES): a Tool for Assessment and Guide for Counseling Practice. Int J Adv Counselling 42, 112–128 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-019-09389-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-019-09389-3

Keywords

Navigation