Congenital bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) consists of two fused cusps and represents a major risk factor for calcific valvular stenosis. Herein, a fully coupled fluid–structure interaction (FSI) BAV model was developed from patient-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compared against in vivo 4-dimensional flow MRI (4D Flow). FSI simulation compared well with 4D Flow, confirming direction and magnitude of the flow jet impinging onto the aortic wall as well as location and extension of secondary flows and vortices developing at systole: the systolic flow jet originating from an elliptical 1.6 cm2 orifice reached a peak velocity of 252.2 cm/s, 0.6% lower than 4D Flow, progressively impinging on the ascending aorta convexity. The FSI model predicted a peak flow rate of 22.4 L/min, 6.7% higher than 4D Flow, and provided BAV leaflets mechanical and flow-induced shear stresses, not directly attainable from MRI. At systole, the ventricular side of the non-fused leaflet revealed the highest wall shear stress (WSS) average magnitude, up to 14.6 Pa along the free margin, with WSS progressively decreasing towards the belly. During diastole, the aortic side of the fused leaflet exhibited the highest diastolic maximum principal stress, up to 322 kPa within the attachment region. Systematic comparison with ground-truth non-invasive MRI can improve the computational model ability to reproduce native BAV hemodynamics and biomechanical response more realistically, and shed light on their role in BAV patients’ risk for developing complications; this approach may further contribute to the validation of advanced FSI simulations designed to assess BAV biomechanics.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aggarwal, A., G. Ferrari, E. Joyce, M. J. Daniels, R. Sainger, J. H. Gorman, 3rd, R. Gorman, and M. S. Sacks. Architectural trends in the human normal and bicuspid aortic valve leaflet and its relevance to valve disease. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 42:986–998, 2014.
Aggarwal, A., and M. S. Sacks. An inverse modeling approach for semilunar heart valve leaflet mechanics: Exploitation of tissue structure. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 15:909–932, 2016.
Baumgartner, H., J. Hung, J. Bermejo, J. B. Chambers, T. Edvardsen, S. Goldstein, P. Lancellotti, M. LeFevre, F. Miller, Jr, and C. M. Otto. Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: A focused update from the european association of cardiovascular imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 30:372–392, 2017.
Bissell, M. M., A. T. Hess, L. Biasiolli, S. J. Glaze, M. Loudon, and A. Pitcher. Aortic dilation in bicuspid aortic valve disease: flow pattern is a major contributor and differs with valve fusion type. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 6:499–507, 2013.
Bollache, E., P. van Ooij, A. Powell, J. Carr, M. Markl, and A. J. Barker. Comparison of 4D flow and 2D velocity-encoded phase contrast MRI sequences for the evaluation of aortic hemodynamics. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 32:1529–1541, 2016.
Callahan, S., N. S. Singam, M. Kendrick, M. J. Negahdar, H. Wang, M. F. Stoddard, and A. A. Amini. Dual-venc acquisition for 4D flow MRI in aortic stenosis with spiral readouts. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27004.
Cao, K., and P. Sucosky. Computational comparison of regional stress and deformation characteristics in tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valve leaflets. Int. J. Num. Methods Biomed. Eng. 33:e02798, 2017.
Cavalcante, J. L., J. A. Lima, A. Redheuil, and M. H. Al-Mallah. Aortic stiffness: Current understanding and future directions. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 57:1511–1522, 2011.
Chandra, S., N. M. Rajamannan, and P. Sucosky. Computational assessment of bicuspid aortic valve wall-shear stress: Implications for calcific aortic valve disease. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 11:1085–1096, 2012.
Cibis, M., W. V. Potters, F. J. Gijsen, H. Marquering, P. vanOoij, E. vanBavel, J. J. Wentzel, and A. J. Nederveen. The effect of spatial and temporal resolution of cine phase contrast MRI on wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index assessment. Plos One 11:e0163316, 2016.
Conti, C. A., A. Della Corte, E. Votta, L. Del Viscovo, C. Bancone, L. S. De Santo, and A. Redaelli. Biomechanical implications of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve: a finite element study of aortic root function from in vivo data. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 140:890–896, 2010.
Conti, C. A., A. Della Corte, E. Votta, L. Del Viscovo, C. Bancone, L. S. DeSanto, and A. Redaelli. Biomechanical implications of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve: A finite element study of aortic root function from in vivo data. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 140:890–896, 2010.
Conti, C. A., E. Votta, A. Della Corte, L. Del Viscovo, C. Bancone, M. Cotrufo, and A. Redaelli. Dynamic finite element analysis of the aortic root from MRI-derived parameters. Med. Eng. Phys. 32:212–221, 2010.
Craven, B. A., E. G. Paterson, G. S. Settles, and M. J. Lawson. Development and verification of a high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics model of canine nasal airflow. J. Biomech. Eng. 131:091002, 2009.
Deck, J. D., M. J. Thubrikar, P. J. Schneider, and S. P. Nolan. Structure, stress, and tissue repair in aortic valve leaflets. Cardiovasc. Res. 22:7–16, 1988.
Dodge, J. T., B. G. Brown, E. L. Bolson, and H. T. Dodge. Lumen diameter of normal human coronary arteries. Influence of age, sex, anatomic variation, and left ventricular hypertrophy or dilation. Circulation 86:232–246, 1992.
Dowling, C., S. Firoozi, and S. J. Brecker. First-in-human experience with patient-specific computer simulation of TAVR in bicuspid aortic valve morphology. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 13:184–192, 2020.
Dyverfeldt, P., M. Bissell, A. J. Barker, A. F. Bolger, C.-J. Carlhäll, T. Ebbers, C. J. Francios, A. Frydrychowicz, J. Geiger, D. Giese, M. D. Hope, P. J. Kilner, S. Kozerke, S. Myerson, S. Neubauer, O. Wieben, and M. Markl. 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 17:72, 2015.
Fratz, S., T. Chung, G. F. Greil, M. M. Samyn, A. M. Taylor, E. R. Valsangiacomo Buechel, S. J. Yoo, and A. J. Powell. Guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children and adults with congenital heart disease: SCMR expert consensus group on congenital heart disease. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 15:51, 2013.
Garcia, J., O. R. Marrufo, A. O. Rodriguez, E. Larose, P. Pibarot, and L. Kadem. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using single plane measurement of effective orifice area. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 14:23, 2012.
Ghosh, R. P., G. Marom, M. Bianchi, K. D’Souza, W. Zietak, and D. Bluestein. Numerical evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve performance during heart beating and its post-deployment fluid-structure interaction analysis. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01304-9.
Gilmanov, A., and F. Sotiropoulos. Comparative hemodynamics in an aorta with bicuspid and trileaflet valves. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 30:67–85, 2016.
Grande, K. J., R. P. Cochran, P. G. Reinhall, and K. S. Kunzelman. Stress variations in the human aortic root and valve: The role of anatomic asymmetry. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 26:534–545, 1998.
Guzzardi, D. G., A. J. Barker, P. van Ooij, S. C. Malaisrie, J. J. Puthumana, D. D. Belke, H. E. Mewhort, D. A. Svystonyuk, S. Kang, S. Verma, J. Collins, J. Carr, R. O. Bonow, M. Markl, J. D. Thomas, P. M. McCarthy, and P. W. Fedak. Valve-related hemodynamics mediate human bicuspid aortopathy: Insights from wall shear stress mapping. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 66:892–900, 2015.
Halevi, R., A. Hamdan, G. Marom, K. Lavon, S. Ben-Zekry, E. Raanani, D. Bluestein, and R. Haj-Ali. Fluid–structure interaction modeling of calcific aortic valve disease using patient-specific three-dimensional calcification scans. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 54:1683–1694, 2016.
Hutcheson, J. D., E. Aikawa, and W. D. Merryman. Potential drug targets for calcific aortic valve disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 11:218–231, 2014.
Jermihov, P. N., L. Jia, M. S. Sacks, R. C. Gorman, J. H. Gorman, 3rd, and K. B. Chandran. Effect of geometry on the leaflet stresses in simulated models of congenital bicuspid aortic valves. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 2:48–56, 2011.
Kim, H. J., I. E. Vignon-Clementel, J. S. Coogan, C. A. Figueroa, K. E. Jansen, and C. A. Taylor. Patient-specific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38:3195–3209, 2010.
Kong, W. K., V. Delgado, K. K. Poh, M. V. Regeer, A. C. Ng, L. McCormack, T. C. Yeo, M. Shanks, S. Parent, R. Enache, B. A. Popescu, M. Liang, J. W. Yip, L. C. Ma, V. Kamperidis, P. J. van Rosendael, E. J. vander Velde, N. Ajmone Marsan, and J. J. Bax. Prognostic implications of raphe in bicuspid aortic valve anatomy. JAMA Cardiol. 2:285–292, 2017.
Lavon, K., R. Halevi, G. Marom, S. BenZekry, A. Hamdan, H. JoachimSchäfers, E. Raanani, and R. Haj-Ali. Fluid–structure interaction models of bicuspid aortic valves: The effects of nonfused cusp angles. J. Biomech. Eng. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038329.
Leopold, J. A. Cellular mechanisms of aortic valve calcification. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 5:605–614, 2012.
Marom, G., H.-S. Kim, M. Rosenfeld, E. Raanani, and R. Haj-Ali. Fully coupled fluid–structure interaction model of congenital bicuspid aortic valves: effect of asymmetry on hemodynamics. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 51:839–848, 2013.
Martin, C., and W. Sun. Biomechanical characterization of aortic valve tissue in humans and common animal models. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 100:1591–1599, 2012.
Michelena, H. I., A. D. Khanna, D. Mahoney, E. Margaryan, Y. Topilsky, R. M. Suri, B. Eidem, W. D. Edwards, T. M. Sundt, III, and M. Enriquez-Sarano. Incidence of aortic complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA 306:1104, 2011.
Miyazaki, S., K. Itatani, T. Furusawa, T. Nishino, M. Sugiyama, Y. Takehara, and S. Yasukochi. Validation of numerical simulation methods in aortic arch using 4D flow MRI. Heart Vessels 32:1032–1044, 2017.
Moore, B. L., and L. P. Dasi. Coronary flow impacts aortic leaflet mechanics and aortic sinus hemodynamics. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 43:2231–2241, 2015.
Nayak, K. S., J. F. Nielsen, M. A. Bernstein, M. Markl, P. D. Gatehouse, R. M. Botnar, D. Saloner, C. Lorenz, H. Wen, B. S. Hu, and F. H. Epstein. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 17:71, 2015.
Piatti, F., F. Sturla, M. M. Bissell, S. Pirola, M. Lombardi, I. Nesteruk, A. DellaCorte, A. C. L. Redaelli, and E. Votta. 4D flow analysis of BAV-related fluid-dynamic alterations: Evidences of wall shear stress alterations in absence of clinically-relevant aortic anatomical remodeling. Front. Physiol. 8:441, 2017.
Rodríguez-Palomares, J. F., L. Dux-Santoy, A. Guala, R. Kale, G. Maldonado, G. Teixidó-Turà, L. Galian, M. Huguet, F. Valente, L. Gutiérrez, T. González-Alujas, K. M. Johnson, O. Wieben, D. García-Dorado, and A. Evangelista. Aortic flow patterns and wall shear stress maps by 4D-flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve disease. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 20:28, 2018.
Sabet, H. Y., W. D. Edwards, H. D. Tazelaar, and R. C. Daly. Congenitally bicuspid aortic valves: A surgical pathology study of 542 cases (1991 through 1996) and a literature review of 2,715 additional cases. Mayo Clin. Proc. 74:14–26, 1999.
Saikrishnan, N., C. H. Yap, N. C. Milligan, N. V. Vasilyev, and A. P. Yoganathan. In vitro characterization of bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics using particle image velocimetry. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40:1760–1775, 2012.
Saitta, S., S. Pirola, F. Piatti, E. Votta, F. Lucherini, F. Pluchinotta, M. Carminati, M. Lombardi, C. Geppert, F. Cuomo, C. A. Figueroa, X. Y. Xu, and A. Redaelli. Evaluation of 4D flow MRI-based non-invasive pressure assessment in aortic coarctations. J. Biomech. 94:13–21, 2019.
Schaefer, B. M., M. B. Lewin, K. K. Stout, E. Gill, A. Prueitt, P. H. Byers, and C. M. Otto. The bicuspid aortic valve: An integrated phenotypic classification of leaflet morphology and aortic root shape. Heart 94:1634–1638, 2008.
Sievers, H.-H., and C. Schmidtke. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 133:1226–1233, 2007.
Sodhani, D., S. Reese, A. Aksenov, S. Soganci, S. Jockenhovel, P. Mela, and S. E. Stapleton. Fluid-structure interaction simulation of artificial textile reinforced aortic heart valve: Validation with an in-vitro test. J. Biomech. 78:52–69, 2018.
Stalder, A. F., A. Frydrychowicz, M. F. Russe, J. G. Korvink, J. Hennig, K. Li, and M. Markl. Assessment of flow instabilities in the healthy aorta using flow-sensitive MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 33:839–846, 2011.
Sucosky, P., K. Balachandran, A. Elhammali, H. Jo, and A. P. Yoganathan. Altered shear stress stimulates upregulation of endothelial VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 in a BMP-4- and TGF-beta1-dependent pathway. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 29:254–260, 2009.
Sun, L., S. Chandra, and P. Sucosky. Ex vivo evidence for the contribution of hemodynamic shear stress abnormalities to the early pathogenesis of calcific bicuspid aortic valve disease. PLoS ONE 7:e48843, 2012.
Sun, L., N. M. Rajamannan, and P. Sucosky. Defining the role of fluid shear stress in the expression of early signaling markers for calcific aortic valve disease. PLoS ONE 8:e84433, 2013.
Verma, S., and S. C. Siu. Aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. N. Engl. J. Med. 370:1920–1929, 2014.
Votta, E., M. Presicce, A. DellaCorte, S. Dellegrottaglie, C. Bancone, F. Sturla, and A. Redaelli. A novel approach to the quantification of aortic root in vivo structural mechanics. Int. J. Num. Methods Biomed. Eng. 33:2849, 2017.
Yap, C. H., N. Saikrishnan, G. Tamilselvan, N. Vasilyev, and A. P. Yoganathan. The congenital bicuspid aortic valve can experience high-frequency unsteady shear stresses on its leaflet surface. Am. J. Physiol. 303:721–731, 2012.
Simulia and Capvidia are in an academic partnership with Dr. Bluestein. This project was supported by NIH-NIBIB-BRPU01EB026414 (DB). IRCCS Policlinico San Donato is a clinical research hospital partially funded by the Italian Ministry of Health.
Conflict of interest
Dr. Bluestein have stock ownership in PolyNova Cardiovascular Inc. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Associate Editor Lakshmi Prasad Dasi oversaw the review of this article
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Emendi, M., Sturla, F., Ghosh, R.P. et al. Patient-Specific Bicuspid Aortic Valve Biomechanics: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Integrated Fluid–Structure Interaction Approach. Ann Biomed Eng 49, 627–641 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02571-4
- Bicuspid aortic valve
- Fluid–structure interaction
- Patient-specific model
- Magnetic resonance imaging
- 4D flow