Abstract
Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) is a serious and prevalent pregnancy complication that is due to placental insufficiency and IUGR babies suffer significantly higher risks of mortality and morbidity. Current detection rate for IUGR is generally poor and thus an alternative diagnostic tool is needed to improve the IUGR detection. Elastography, a non-invasive method that measures the tissue stiffness, has been proposed as one such technique. However, to date, we have limited information on the mechanical properties of IUGR placenta. In this study, we investigated the mechanical properties of normal and IUGR placentae and prescribed a suitable hyperelastic model to describe their mechanical behaviors. A total of 46 normal and 43 IUGR placenta samples were investigated. Results showed that placenta samples were isotropic, but had a high spatial variability of stiffness. The samples also had significant viscoelasticity. IUGR placenta was observed to be slightly stiffer than normal placenta but the difference was significant only at compression rate of 0.25 Hz and with 20% compression depth. Three simple hyperelastic models—Yeoh, Ogden and Fung models, were found to be able to fit the experimentally measured mechanical behaviors, and Fung model performed slightly better. These results may be useful for optimizing placenta elastography for the detection of IUGR.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet. Gynecol. 121:1122–1133, 2013.
Barut, F., A. Barut, B. D. Gun, N. O. Kandemir, M. I. Harma, M. Harma, E. Aktunc, and S. O. Ozdamar. Intrauterine growth restriction and placental angiogenesis. Diagn. Pathol. 5:24, 2010.
Buehren, M. Differential Evolution. MATLAB Central File Exchange, 2017. https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/18593-differential-evolution.
Cantisani, V., H. Grazhdani, E. Drakonaki, V. D’Andrea, M. Di Segni, E. Kaleshi, F. Calliada, C. Catalano, A. Redler, and L. Brunese. Strain US elastography for the characterization of thyroid nodules: advantages and limitation. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/908575.
Chuong, C. J., and Y. C. Fung. Three-dimensional stress distribution in arteries. J. Biomech. Eng. 105:268–274, 1983.
Cimsit, C., T. Yoldemir, and I. N. Akpinar. Strain elastography in placental dysfunction: placental elasticity differences in normal and preeclamptic pregnancies in the second trimester. Archiv. Gynecol. Obstet. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3479-y.
Durhan, G., H. Unverdi, C. Deveci, M. Buyuksireci, J. Karakaya, T. Degirmenci, A. Bayrak, P. Kosar, S. Hucumenoglu, and Y. Ergun. Placental Elasticity and histopathological findings in normal and intra-uterine growth restriction pregnancies assessed with strain elastography in ex vivo placenta. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 43:111–118, 2017.
Goenezen, S., J.-F. Dord, Z. Sink, P. E. Barbone, J. Jiang, T. J. Hall, and A. A. Oberai. Linear and nonlinear elastic modulus imaging: an application to breast cancer diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 31:1628–1637, 2012.
Hall, T. J., P. E. Barboneg, A. A. Oberai, J. Jiang, J.-F. Dord, S. Goenezen, and T. G. Fisher. Recent results in nonlinear strain and modulus imaging. Curr. Med. Imaging Rev. 7:313–327, 2011.
Harding, K., S. Evans, and J. Newnham. Screening for the small fetus: a study of the relative efficacies of ultrasound biometry and symphysiofundal height. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 35:160–164, 1995.
Hu, J., K. D. Klinich, C. S. Miller, G. Nazmi, M. D. Pearlman, L. W. Schneider, and J. D. Rupp. Quantifying dynamic mechanical properties of human placenta tissue using optimization techniques with specimen-specific finite-element models. J. Biomech. 42:2528–2534, 2009.
Langheinrich, A., S. Vorman, J. Seidenstücker, M. Kampschulte, R. Bohle, J. Wienhard, and M. Zygmunt. Quantitative 3D micro-CT imaging of the human feto-placental vasculature in intrauterine growth restriction. Placenta. 29:937–941, 2008.
Lau, J. S., S. N. Saw, M. L. Buist, A. Biswas, C. N. Z. Mattar, and C. H. Yap. Mechanical testing and non-linear viscoelastic modelling of the human placenta in normal and growth restricted pregnancies. J. Biomech. 49:173–184, 2016.
Lausman, A., F. P. McCarthy, M. Walker, and J. Kingdom. Screening, diagnosis, and management of intrauterine growth restriction. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 34:17–28, 2012.
Lindqvist, P. G., and J. Molin. Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome? Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 25:258–264, 2005.
Manoogian, S. J., J. A. Bisplinghoff, C. McNally, A. R. Kemper, A. C. Santago, and S. M. Duma. Effect of strain rate on the tensile material properties of human placenta. J. Biomech. Eng. 131:091008, 2009.
Mathews, T. J., and M. F. MacDorman. Infant mortality statistics from the 2007 period linked birth/infant death data set. Natl. Vital Stat. Rep. 59:1–30, 2011.
Oberai, A. A., N. H. Gokhale, S. Goenezen, P. E. Barbone, T. J. Hall, A. M. Sommer, and J. Jiang. Linear and nonlinear elasticity imaging of soft tissue in vivo: demonstration of feasibility. Phys. Med. Biol. 54:1191–1207, 2009.
Ogden R. Large deformation isotropic elasticity-on the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, The Royal Society, 1972, pp. 565–584.
Ophir, J., S. K. Alam, B. S. Garra, F. Kallel, E. E. Konofagou, T. Krouskop, C. R. B. Merritt, R. Righetti, R. Souchon, S. Srinivasan, and T. Varghese. Elastography: imaging the elastic properties of soft tissues with ultrasound. J. Med. Ultrason. 29:155, 2002.
Ophir, J., I. Céspedes, H. Ponnekanti, Y. Yazdi, and X. Li. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason. Imaging. 13:111–134, 1991.
Pavan, T. Z., E. L. Madsen, G. R. Frank, A. A. O. Carneiro, and T. J. Hall. Nonlinear elastic behavior of phantom materials for elastography. Phys. Med. Biol. 55:2679–2692, 2010.
Peyter, A.-C., F. Delhaes, D. Baud, Y. Vial, G. Diaceri, S. Menétrey, P. Hohlfeld, and J.-F. Tolsa. Intrauterine growth restriction is associated with structural alterations in human umbilical cord and decreased nitric oxide-induced relaxation of umbilical vein. Placenta. 35:891–899, 2014.
Platz, E., and R. Newman. Diagnosis of IUGR: traditional biometry. Semin. Perinatol. 32:140–147, 2008.
Sankaran, S., and P. M. Kyle. Aetiology and pathogenesis of IUGR. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 23:765–777, 2009.
Sati, L., A. Y. Demir, L. Sarikcioglu, and R. Demir. Arrangement of collagen fibers in human placental stem villi. Acta Histochem. 110:371–379, 2008.
Saw, S. N., C. Dawn, A. Biswas, C. N. Z. Mattar, and C. H. Yap. Characterization of the in vivo wall shear stress environment of human fetus umbilical arteries and veins. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 16:197–211, 2017.
Saw, S. N., J. Y. R. Low, C. N. Z. Mattar, A. Biswas, L. Chen, and C. H. Yap. Motorizing and optimizing ultrasound strain elastography for detection of intrauterine growth restriction pregnancies. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 44:532–543, 2018.
Schneider, C. A., W. S. Rasband, and K. W. Eliceiri. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods. 9:671–675, 2012.
Slator, P. J., J. Hutter, L. McCabe, A. D. S. Gomes, A. N. Price, E. Panagiotaki, M. A. Rutherford, J. V. Hajnal, and D. C. Alexander. Quantifying placental microcirculation and microstructure with anisotropic IVIM models. Placenta. 57:290–291, 2017.
Varghese, T., J. Ophir, and T. A. Krouskop. Nonlinear stress-strain relationships in tissue and their effect on the contrast-to-noise ratio in elastograms. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 26:839–851, 2000.
Villar, J., L. Cheikh Ismail, C. Victora, E. Ohuma, E. Bertino, D. Altman, A. Lambert, A. Papageorghiou, M. Carvalho, and Y. Jaffer. International fetal and newborn growth consortium for the 21st century (INTERGROWTH-21st). International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st project. Lancet. 384:857–868, 2014.
Wang, Z. G., Y. Liu, G. Wang, and L. Z. Sun. Elastography method for reconstruction of nonlinear breast tissue properties. Int. J. Biomed. Imaging. 2009:406854, 2009.
Wang, Y., and S. Zhao. Structure of the placenta. In: Vascular Biology of the Placenta, edited by Y. Wang. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences, 2010.
Warsof, S. L., D. J. Cooper, D. Little, and S. Campbell. Routine ultrasound screening for antenatal detection of intrauterine growth retardation. Obstet. Gynecol. 67:33–39, 1986.
Weed, B. C., A. Borazjani, S. S. Patnaik, R. Prabhu, F. Horstemeyer, P. L. Ryan, T. F. Laki, N. W. Lakiesha, and J. Liao. Stress state and strain rate dependence of the human placenta. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40:2255–2265, 2012.
Yeoh, O. H. Some forms of the strain energy function for rubber. Rubber Chem. Technol. 66:754–771, 1993.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National University of Singapore Young Investigator Award 2015 (PI: Yap) and the Ministry of Education of Singapore Academic Research Fund Tier 1 Grant entitled “Placenta Blood Oxygen Monitor for Intrauterine Growth Restriction Pregnancies (PI: Yap). We would like to express our gratitude to Cecille Arquillo Laureano, Cynthia Pamela Zapata Tagarino, Maylene Zipagan and other staff members from Obstetrics & Gynecology Department at National University Hospital for their assistance with patient eligibility and tissue procurement.
Conflict of interest
All authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Eiji Tanaka oversaw the review of this article.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saw, S.N., Low, J.Y.R., Ong, M.H.H. et al. Hyperelastic Mechanical Properties of Ex Vivo Normal and Intrauterine Growth Restricted Placenta. Ann Biomed Eng 46, 1066–1077 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-2019-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-2019-5