Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Localization of the Sentinel Node in Breast Cancer: Identical Results With Same-Day and Day-Before Isotope Injection

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background:Although the technique of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in breast cancer is not fully standardized, an increasing number of centers map the SLN by using radioisotope supplemented by blue dye, and most have injected isotope on the day of surgery. Here we directly compare the results of same-day and day-before isotope injection in a large series of breast cancer patients having SLN biopsy with our mature technique.

Methods:Starting with our 961st SLN procedure for breast cancer, 1320 consecutive patients had SLN biopsy after the injection of unfiltered 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid given as a single-site, low-volume (0.05 ml) intradermal injection: 933 on the day of surgery (1-day protocol) and 387 on the day before (2-day protocol). All had intraparenchymal injection of blue dye.

Results:The two groups were comparable in age, tumor location, histopathologic characteristics, and number of SLNs identified. LSG taken at 2 hours in the 2-day protocol was positive more often than LSG performed at 30 minutes in the 1-day protocol, and nonaxillary sites of lymphatic drainage were seen in <1% of each group. Absolute isotope counts and the ratio of SLN to axillary background counts were similar. Isotope localization of the SLN succeeded in a comparable fraction of patients, as did SLN identification overall.

Conclusions:The results of SLN mapping with same-day and day-before injection of radioisotope are virtually identical. The logistical advantages of day-before injection do not compromise the success of the procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Cody HS. Clinical aspects of sentinel node biopsy. Breast Cancer Res 2001;3:104–108.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1994;220:391–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet 1997;349:1864–1867.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Galimberti V, Zurrida S, Zucali P, Luini A. Can sentinel node biopsy avoid axillary dissection in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients?. Breast 1998;7:8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borgstein PJ, Pijpers R, Comans EF, van Diest PJ, Boom RP, Meijer S. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:275–283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pijpers R, Meijer S, Hoekstra OS, et al. Impact of lymphoscintigraphy on sentinel node identification with technetium-99m-colloidal albumin in breast cancer. J Nucl Med 1997;38:366–368.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roumen RMH, Valkenburg JGM, Geuskens LM. Lymphoscintigraphy and feasibility of sentinel node biopsy in 83 patients with primary breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 1997;23:495–502.

    Google Scholar 

  8. O’Hea BJ, Hill ADK, El-Shirbiny A, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: initial experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:423–427.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hill ADK, Tran KN, Akhurst T, et al. Lessons learned from 500 cases of lymphatic mapping for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1999;229:528–535.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cody HS, Borgen PI. State-of-the-art approaches to sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: study design, patient selection, technique, and quality control at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Surg Oncol 1999;8:85–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cody HS, Fey J, Akhurst T, et al. Complementarity of blue dye and isotope in sentinel node localization for breast cancer: univariate and multivariate analysis of 966 procedures. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Linehan DC, Hill ADK, Tran KN, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: unfiltered radioisotope is superior to filtered. J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:377–381.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Linehan DC, Hill ADK, Akhurst T, Tran KN, Borgen PI, Cody HS. Intradermal radiocolloid and intraparenchymal blue dye injection optimize sentinel node identification in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:450–454.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boolbol SK, Fey J, Borgen PI, et al. Intradermal isotope injection: a highly accurate method of lymphatic mapping in breast carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cody HS, Hill ADK, Tran KN, Brennan MF, Borgen PI. Credentialing for breast lymphatic mapping—how many cases are enough?. Ann Surg 1999;229:723–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morton DL, Bostick PJ. Will the true sentinel node please stand?. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McMasters KM, Tuttle TM, Carlson DJ, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: a suitable alternative to routine axillary dissection in multi-institutional practice when optimal technique is used. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2560–2566.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yeung HWD, Cody HS, Turlakow A, et al. Lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node localization in breast cancer patients: a comparison between one-day and two-day protocols. J Nucl Med 2001;42:420–423.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jansen L, Doting MH, Rutgers EJ, de Vries J, Olmos RA, Nieweg OE. Clinical relevance of sentinel lymph nodes outside the axilla in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg 2000;87:920–925.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liberman L, Cody HS, Hill ADK, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy after percutaneous diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer. Radiology 1999;211:835–844.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miner TJ, Shriver CD, Flicek PR, et al. Guidelines for the safe use of radioactive materials during localization and resection of the sentinel lymph node. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stratmann SL, McCarty TM, Kuhn JA. Radiation safety with breast sentinel node biopsy. Am J Surg 1999;178:454–457.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Winchester DJ, Sener SF, Winchester DP, et al. Sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer: experience with 180 consecutive patients: efficacy of filtered technetium 99m sulphur colloid with overnight migration time. J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:597–603.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiram S. Cody III MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCarter, M.D., Yeung, H., Yeh, S. et al. Localization of the Sentinel Node in Breast Cancer: Identical Results With Same-Day and Day-Before Isotope Injection. Ann Surg Oncol 8, 682–686 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-001-0682-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-001-0682-4

Key Words:

Navigation