Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of integrating memory on the performance of the fractional plasticity model for geomaterials

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fractional plasticity model for geomaterials is proposed by using the fractional derivative. Due to the integral definition of the fractional derivative, the range of load memory for calculating the flow direction may influence the subsequent model performance. Therefore, an investigation on the memory dependence of the model was conducted. It was found that the load memory affected the stress–dilatancy behavior of the geomaterial. Due to the loss of memory from zero- to confining-stress states, slightly higher strain is reported, whereas an insignificant difference in the predicted deviator stress is observed. Thus, for engineering applications, starting the memory from the zero-stress state, which avoids mathematical complexity, is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khalili, N., Habte, M.A., Valliappan, S.: A bounding surface plasticity model for cyclic loading of granular soils. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 63, 1939–1960 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, H.B., Zou, D.G., Liu, J.M.: Constitutive modeling of dense gravelly soils subjected to cyclic loading. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 38, 1503–1518 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kan, M.E., Taiebat, H.A.: A bounding surface plasticity model for highly crushable granular materials. Soils Found. 54, 1188–1201 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xiao, Y., Liu, H.: Elastoplastic constitutive model for rockfill materials considering particle breakage. Int. J. Geomech. 17, 04016041 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun, Y., Indraratna, B., Carter, J.P., et al.: Application of fractional calculus in modelling ballast deformation under cyclic loading. Comput. Geotech. 82, 16–30 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liao, M., Lai, Y., Liu, E., et al.: A fractional order creep constitutive model of warm frozen silt. Acta Geotech. 12, 377–389 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu, Z., Chen, W.: A fractional-order model on new experiments of linear viscoelastic creep of Hami Melon. Comput. Math. Appl. 66, 677–681 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu, S., Cai, C., Spanos, P.D.: A nonlinear and fractional derivative viscoelastic model for rail pads in the dynamic analysis of coupled vehicle-slab track systems. J. Sound Vib. 335, 304–320 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang, X., Chen, W., Sun, H.: Fractional time-dependent apparent viscosity model for semisolid foodstuffs. Mech. Time-Depend. Mater. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-017-9366-8

  10. Sun, Y., Xiao, Y., Zheng, C., et al.: Modelling long-term deformation of granular soils incorporating the concept of fractional calculus. Acta. Mech. Sin. 32, 112–124 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou, H.W., Wang, C.P., Mishnaevsky, L., et al.: A fractional derivative approach to full creep regions in salt rock. Mech. Time-Depend. Mater. 17, 413–425 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou, H.W., Wang, C.P., Han, B.B., et al.: A creep constitutive model for salt rock based on fractional derivatives. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 48, 116–121 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sumelka, W.: Fractional viscoplasticity. Mech. Res. Commun. 56, 31–36 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun, Y., Shen, Y.: Constitutive model of granular soils using fractional order plastic flow rule. Int. J. Geomech. 17, 04017025 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun, Y., Xiao, Y.: Fractional order plasticity model for granular soils subjected to monotonic triaxial compression. Int. J. Solids Struct. 118–119, 224–234 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Roscoe, K.H., Burland, J.B.: On the generalised stress–strain behaviour of ’wet’ clay. In: Heyman, J., Leckie, F.A. (eds.) Engineering Plasticity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Been, K., Jefferies, M.G.: A state parameter for sands. Géotechnique 22, 99–112 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li, X., Wang, Y.: Linear representation of steady-state line for sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124, 1215–1217 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ishihara, K., Tatsuoka, F., Yasuda, S.: Undrained deformation and liquefaction of sand under cyclic stresses. Soils Found. 15, 29–44 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Aursudkij, B., McDowell, G.R., Collop, A.C.: Cyclic loading of railway ballast under triaxial conditions and in a railway test facility. Granul. Matter 11, 391–401 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 41630638), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant 2017B05214) are appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yifei Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Y., Gao, Y. & Song, S. Effect of integrating memory on the performance of the fractional plasticity model for geomaterials. Acta Mech. Sin. 34, 896–901 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-018-0777-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-018-0777-9

Keywords

Navigation