Skip to main content
Log in

Fourier time spectral method for subsonic and transonic flows

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The time accuracy of the exponentially accurate Fourier time spectral method (TSM) is examined and compared with a conventional 2nd-order backward difference formula (BDF) method for periodic unsteady flows. In particular, detailed error analysis based on numerical computations is performed on the accuracy of resolving the local pressure coefficient and global integrated force coefficients for smooth subsonic and non-smooth transonic flows with moving shock waves on a pitching airfoil. For smooth subsonic flows, the Fourier TSM method offers a significant accuracy advantage over the BDF method for the prediction of both the local pressure coefficient and integrated force coefficients. For transonic flows where the motion of the discontinuous shock wave contributes significant higher-order harmonic contents to the local pressure fluctuations, a sufficient number of modes must be included before the Fourier TSM provides an advantage over the BDF method. The Fourier TSM, however, still offers better accuracy than the BDF method for integrated force coefficients even for transonic flows. A problem of non-symmetric solutions for symmetric periodic flows due to the use of odd numbers of intervals is uncovered and analyzed. A frequency-searching method is proposed for problems where the frequency is not known a priori. The method is tested on the vortex shedding problem of the flow over a circular cylinder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yao, J., Jameson, A., Alonso, J.J., et al.: Development and validation of a massively parallel flow solver for turbomachinery flows. J. Propuls. Power 17, 659–668 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sadeghi, M., Liu, F.: Inverstigation of mistuning effects on cascade flutter using a coupled method. J. Propuls. Power 23, 266–272 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, F., Cai, J., Zhu, Y., et al.: Calculation of wing flutter by a coupled fluid-structure method. J. Aircr. 38, 334–342 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xiao, Q., Tsai, H.M., Liu, F.: Numerical study of transonic buffet on a supercritical airfoil. AIAA J. 44, 620–628 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xiong, J., Nielsen, P., Liu, F., et al.: Computation of high-speed coaxial jets with fan fLow deflection. AIAA J. 48, 2249–2262 (2010). doi:10.2514/1.51645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. He, G.W., Rubinstein, R., Wang, L.P.: Effects of subgrid-scale modeling on time correlations in large eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids 14, 2186–2193 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. He, G.W., Wang, M., Lele, S.K.: On the computation of space-time correlations by large-eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids 16, 3859–3867 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, Y., He, G.W., Wang, L.P.: Effects of subgrid-scale modeling on lagrangian statistics in large eddy simulation. J. Turbul. 9, 1–24 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jin, G.D., He, G.W., Wang, L.P.: Large-eddy simulation of turbulent-collision of heavy particles in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 22, 1–13 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Jameson, A.: Time dependent calculations using multigrid, with applications to unsteady flows past airfoils and wings. In: AIAA 10th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, AIAA-91-1596 (1991)

  11. Liu, F., Ji, S.: Unsteady flow calculations with a multigrid Navier–Stokes method. AIAA J. 34, 2047–2053 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hall, K.C., Crawley, E.F.: Calculation of unsteady flows in turbomachinery using the linearized Euler equations. AIAA J. 27, 777–787 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ning, W., He, L.: Computation of unsteady flows around oscillating blades using linear and nonlinear harmonic Euler methods. ASME J. Turbomach. 120, 508–514 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hall, K.C., Thomas, J.P., Clark, W.S.: Computation of unsteady nonlinear flows in cascades using a harmonic balance technique. AIAA J. 40, 879–886 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gopinath, A.K., Weide, E., Alonso, J.J., et al.: Three-dimensional unsteady multi-stage turbomachinery simulations using the harmonic balance technique. In: 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, AIAA-2007-0892 (2007)

  16. Ekici, K., Hall, K.C., Dowell, E.H.: Computationally fast harmonic balance methods for unsteady aerodynamic predictions of helicopter rotors. In: 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, AIAA-2008-1439 (2008)

  17. McMullen, M., Jameson, A., Alonso, J.J.: Application of a non-linear frequency domain solver to the Euler and Navier–Stokes equations. In: 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA-2002-0120 (2002)

  18. Gopinath, A.K., Jameson, A.: Application of the time spectral method to periodic unsteady vortex shedding. In: 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, AIAA-2006-0449 (2006)

  19. McMullen, M., Jameson, A.: The computational efficiency of non-linear frequency domain methods. J. Comput. Phys. 212, 637–661 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Jameson, A., Schmidt, W., Turkel, E.: Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge–Kutta time stepping schemes. In: AIAA 14th Fluid and Plasma Dynamic Conference, AIAA-81-1259 (1981)

  21. Landon, R.H.: NACA0012 oscillation and transient pitching, compendium of unsteady aerodynamic measurements, data set 3. AGARD Technical Report No.702 (1982)

  22. Gao, C., Yang, S., Luo, S., et al.: Calculation of airfoil flutter by and Euler method with approximate boundary condition. AIAA J. 43, 295–305 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gao, C., Luo, S., Liu, F.: Numerical solution of the unsteady Euler equations for airfoils using approximate boundary conditions. Acta Mech. Sin. 19, 427–436 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Williamson, C.H.K.: Defining a universal and contiguous Strouhal–Reynolds number relationship of the laminar vortex shedding of a circular cylinder. Phys. Fluids 31, 2742–2744 (1988). doi:10.1063/1.866978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Williamson, C.H.K.: Measurements of base pressure in the wake of a cylinder at low Renolds numbers. Technical report 14, Z. Flugwiss, Weltraumforsch, 38–46 (1990)

  26. Roshko, A.: On the development of turbulent wakes from vortex streets. NACA Technical Note No.1191 (1953)

  27. Henderson, R.D.: Details of the drag curve near the onset of vortex shedding. Phys. Fluids 7, 2102–2104 (1995). doi:10.1063/1.868459

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the State Scholarship Fund of the China Scholarship Council (Grant 2009629129).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhan, L., Liu, F. & Papamoschou, D. Fourier time spectral method for subsonic and transonic flows. Acta Mech. Sin. 32, 380–396 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-015-0547-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-015-0547-x

Keywords

Navigation