Advertisement

Acta Mechanica Sinica

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 181–190 | Cite as

How does a woodpecker work? An impact dynamics approach

  • Yuzhe Liu
  • Xinming QiuEmail author
  • Tongxi Yu
  • Jiawei Tao
  • Ze Cheng
Research paper

Abstract

To understand how a woodpecker is able accelerate its head to such a high velocity in a short amount of time, a multi-rigid-segment model of a woodpecker’s body is established in this study. Based on the skeletal specimen of the woodpecker and several videos of woodpeckers pecking, the parameters of a three-degree-of-freedom system are determined. The high velocity of the head is found to be the result of a whipping effect, which could be affected by muscle torque and tendon stiffness. The mechanism of whipping is analyzed by comparing the response of a hinged rod to that of a rigid rod. Depending on the parameters, the dynamic behavior of a hinged rod is classified into three response modes. Of these, a high free-end velocity could be achieved in mode II. The model is then generalized to a multihinge condition, and the free-end velocity is found to increase with hinge number, which explains the high free-end velocity resulting from whipping. Furthermore, the effects of some other factors, such as damping and mass distribution, on the velocity are also discussed.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Woodpecker Muscle torque High impact velocity  Whipping Hinged rod 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant 11372163) and the National Fundamental Research Program of China (Grant 2011CB610305). The third author (T.X. Yu) gratefully acknowledges the support of the NSFC Key Project 11032001.

References

  1. 1.
    Gibson, L.: Woodpecker pecking: How woodpeckers avoid brain injury. J. Zool. 270, 462–465 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang, L., Cheung, J.T.-M., Pu, F., et al.: Why do woodpeckers resist head impact injury: a biomechanical investigation. PLoS One 6, e26490 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yoon, S.-H., Park, S.: A mechanical analysis of woodpecker drumming and its application to shock-absorbing systems. Bioinspiration Biomim. 6, 016003 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhu, Z., Zhang, W., Wu, C.: Energy conversion in woodpecker on successive peckings and its role on anti-shock protection of brain. Sci. China: Technol. Sci. 57, 1269–1275 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oda, J., Sakamoto, J., Sakano, K.: Mechanical evaluation of the skeletal structure and tissue of the woodpecker and its shock absorbing system. JSME Int. J., Ser. A. 49, 390–396 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vincent, J., Sahinkaya, M., O’Shea, W.: A woodpecker hammer. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C. 221, 1141–1147 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McNeill Alexander, R.: Tendon elasticity and muscle function. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Part A: Mol. Integr. Physiol. 133, 1001–1011 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bennet-Clark, H., Lucey, E.: The jump of the flea: a study of the energetics and a model of the mechanism. J. Exp. Biol. 47, 59–76 (1967)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelley, D.E., Slasky, B.S., Janosky, J.: Skeletal muscle density: effects of obesity and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 54, 509–515 (1991)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics; Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuzhe Liu
    • 1
  • Xinming Qiu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tongxi Yu
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jiawei Tao
    • 1
  • Ze Cheng
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Engineering MechanicsTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringHong Kong University of Science and TechnologyKowloonChina
  3. 3.Ningbo UniversityNingboChina

Personalised recommendations