Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic flight stability of hovering insects

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The equations of motion of an insect with flapping wings are derived and then simplified to that of a flying body using the “rigid body” assumption. On the basis of the simplified equations of motion, the longitudinal dynamic flight stability of four insects (hoverfly, cranefly, dronefly and hawkmoth) in hovering flight is studied (the mass of the insects ranging from 11 to 1,648 mg and wingbeat frequency from 26 to 157 Hz). The method of computational fluid dynamics is used to compute the aerodynamic derivatives and the techniques of eigenvalue and eigenvector analysis are used to solve the equations of motion. The validity of the “rigid body” assumption is tested and how differences in size and wing kinematics influence the applicability of the “rigid body” assumption is investigated. The primary findings are: (1) For insects considered in the present study and those with relatively high wingbeat frequency (hoverfly, drone fly and bumblebee), the “rigid body” assumption is reasonable, and for those with relatively low wingbeat frequency (cranefly and howkmoth), the applicability of the “rigid body” assumption is questionable. (2) The same three natural modes of motion as those reported recently for a bumblebee are identified, i.e., one unstable oscillatory mode, one stable fast subsidence mode and one stable slow subsidence mode. (3) Approximate analytical expressions of the eigenvalues, which give physical insight into the genesis of the natural modes of motion, are derived. The expressions identify the speed derivative M u (pitching moment produced by unit horizontal speed) as the primary source of the unstable oscillatory mode and the stable fast subsidence mode and Z w (vertical force produced by unit vertical speed) as the primary source of the stable slow subsidence mode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ellington C.P., van den Berg C., Willmott A.P. and Thomas A.L.R. (1996). Leading edge vortices in insect flight. Nature 347: 472–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dickinson M.H., Lehman F.O. and Sane S.P. (1999). Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science 284: 1954–1960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun M. and Tang J. (2002). Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. J. Exp. Biol. 205: 55–70

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas A.L.R. and Taylor G.K. (2001). Animal flight dynamics. I. Stability in gliding fight. J. Theor. Biol. 212: 399–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor G.K. and Thomas A.L.R. (2002). Animal flight dynamics. II. Longitudinal stability in flapping flight. J. Theor. Biol. 214: 351–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor G.K. and Thomas A.L.R. (2003). Dynamic flight stability in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. J. Exp. Biol. 206: 2803–2829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun M. and Xiong Y. (2005). Dynamic flight stability of a hovering bumblebee. J. Exp. Biol. 208: 447–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gebert, G., Gallmeier, P., Evers, J.: Equations of motion for flapping flight. AIAA Paper, pp 2002–4872 (2002)

  9. Etkin B. and Reid L.D. (1996). Dynamics of Flight: Stability and Control. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ellington C.P. (1984). The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. II. Morphological parameters. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 305: 17–40

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ellington C.P. (1984). The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. III. Kinematics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 305: 79–113

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ennos A.R. (1989). The kinematics and aerodynamics of the free flight of some diptera. J. Exp. Biol. 142: 49–85

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meriam J.L. (1975). Dynamics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burington R.S. (1973). Handbook of Mathematical Tables and Formulas. McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mao Sun.

Additional information

The project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (10232010 and 10472008).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, M., Wang, J. & Xiong, Y. Dynamic flight stability of hovering insects. Acta Mech Sin 23, 231–246 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-007-0068-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-007-0068-3

Keywords

Navigation