There is a significant relationship between morning blood pressure surge and increased abdominal aortic intima–media thickness in hypertensive patients

  • Ayse Selcan Koc
  • Ferıde Fatma Gorgulu
  • Yurdaer Donmez
  • Yahya Kemal Icen
Original Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

There are limited data about increased aortic intima–media thickness (A-IMT) in the presence of subclinical target organ damage in hypertensive (HT) patients. In this study, we aimed to determine the frequency of increased A-IMT, the parameters determining increased A-IMT, and the relationship between increased A-IMT and other vascular IMT measurements.

Materials and methods

We prospectively included 265 patients (mean age 54.1 ± 10.6 years, male/female 91/174) with essential HT. Physical examination of all patients was performed. Laboratory data and antihypertensive treatments were recorded. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed. Bilateral carotid, brachial, and femoral artery and abdominal A-IMT values were measured by B-mode ultrasonography (USG). Patients were categorized into two main groups: patients with increased A-IMT (≥ 3 mm) or normal A-IMT (< 3 mm).

Results

Increased A-IMT was detected in 55 patients (20.8%). There was a close relationship between increased A-IMT and advanced age, presence of coronary artery disease, high morning blood pressure surge (MBPS), and bilateral carotid and femoral IMT. Parameters associated with increased A-IMT in univariate analysis were assessed by regression analysis. Left femoral IMT and MBPS were independently associated with increased A-IMT. In the regression model, each 5-mmHg elevation in MBPS increased the risk of increased A-IMT by 34.2%. The cutoff value of MBPS obtained by the ROC curve analysis was 32 mmHg for the prediction of increased A-IMT (sensitivity 76.3%, specificity 63.5%). The area under the curve was 0.784 (95% CI 0.720–0.847, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Abdominal A-IMT increased at a significant rate in patients with HT. An independent association was found between MBPS and A-IMT, which can both be easily detected by ABPM and B-mode USG. The high MBPS level was considered to be a simple and inexpensive method for detecting subclinical target organ damage. A-IMT measurement should also be a part of abdominal USG, which is a routine examination in HT patients.

Keywords

Aortic intima–media thickness Morning blood pressure surge 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests and sources of funding.

Ethical statement

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from patients for being included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Salonen R, Salonen JT. Carotid atherosclerosis in relation to systolic and diastolic blood pressure: Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study. Ann Med. 1991;23:23–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2159–219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sartorato P, Zulian E, Benedini S, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors and ultrasound evaluation of intima–media thickness at common carotids, carotid bulbs, and femoral and abdominal aorta arteries in patients with classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:1015–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belhassen L, Carville C, Pelle G, et al. Evaluation of carotid artery and aortic intima–media thickness measurements for exclusion of significant coronary atherosclerosis in patients scheduled for heart valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1139–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kallizaros JE, Tsioufis CP, Stefanadis CI, et al. Close relation between carotid and ascending aortic atherosclerosis in cardiac patients. Circulation. 2000;102:263–8.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tomochika Y, Tanaka N, Ono S, et al. Assessment by transesophageal echography of atherosclerosis of the descending thoracic aorta in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:703–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Labropoulos N, Zarge J, Mansour MA, et al. Compensatory arterial enlargement is a common pathobiologic response in early atherosclerosis. Am J Surg. 1998;176:140–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meena D, Prakash M, Gupta Y, et al. Carotid, aorta and renal arteries intima–media thickness in patients with sporadic idiopathic hypoparathyroidism. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015;19:262–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Muller JE, Stone PH, Turi ZG, et al. Circadian variation in the frequency of onset of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1985;21:1315–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elliott WJ. Circadian variation in the timing of stroke onset: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 1998;29:992–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muller JE, Ludmer PL, Willich SN, et al. Circadian variation in the frequency of sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 1987;75:131–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alpaydin S, Turan Y, Caliskan M, et al. Morning blood pressure surge is associated with carotid intima–media thickness in prehypertensive patients. Blood Press Monit. 2017;22:131–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kario K, Pickering TG, Umeda Y, et al. Morning surge in blood pressure as a predictor of silent and clinical cerebrovascular disease in elderly hypertensives: a prospective study. Circulation. 2003;107:1401–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gosse P, Lasserre R, Minifie C, et al. Blood pressure surge on rising. J Hypertens. 2004;22:1113–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Metoki H, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, et al. Prognostic significance for stroke of a morning pressure surge and a nocturnal blood pressure decline: the Ohasama Study. Hypertension. 2006;47:149–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li Y, Thijs L, Hansen TW, International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes Investigators, et al. Prognostic value of the morning blood pressure surge in 5645 subjects from 8 populations. Hypertension. 2010;55:1040–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Amici A, Cicconetti P, Sagrafoli C, et al. Exaggerated morning blood pressure surge and cardiovascular events: a 5-year longitudinal study in normotensive and well-controlled hypertensive elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009;49:e105–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Metoki H, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, et al. Prognostic significance of night-time, early morning, and daytime blood pressures on the risk of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular mortality: the Ohasama Study. J Hypertens. 2006;24:1841–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    White WB. The risk of waking-up: impact of the morning surge in blood pressure. Hypertension. 2010;55:835–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zakopoulos NA, Tsivgoulis G, Barlas G, et al. Time rate of blood pressure variation is associated with increased common carotid artery intima–media thickness. Hypertension. 2005;45:505–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stergiou GS, Salgami EV. World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension (WHO-ISH); USA Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure (JNC-7); European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology (ESH-ESC). New European, American and International guidelines for hypertension management: agreement and disagreement. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2004;2:359–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kario K. Orthostatic hypertension—a new haemodynamic cardiovascular risk factor. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2013;9:726–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pickering TG, Shimbo D, Haas D. Ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2368–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Neiva Neto EC, Piatto MJ, Paschôa AF, et al. Intima–media thickness: correlation between carotids, vertebral artery, aorta and femoral arteries. Int Angiol. 2015;34:269–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Handa N, Matsumoto M, Maeda H, et al. Ultrasonic evaluation of early carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke. 1990;21:1567–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Heiss G, Sharrett AR, Barnes R, et al. Carotid atherosclerosis measured by B-mode ultrasound in populations: associations with cardiovascular risk factors in the ARIC study. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134:250–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wofford JL, Kahl FR, Howard GR, et al. Relation of extent of extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis as measured by B-mode ultrasound to the extent of coronary atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11:1786–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    O’Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, The Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group, et al. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:14–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cheng KS, Mikhailidis DP, Hamilton G, et al. A review of the carotid and femoral intima–media thickness as an indicator of the presence of peripheral vascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;54:528–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kirhmajer MV, Banfic L, Vojkovic M, et al. Correlation of femoral intima–media thickness and the severity of coronary artery disease. Angiology. 2011;62:134–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McGill HC Jr, McMahan CA, Herderick EE, et al. Effects of coronary heart disease risk factors on atherosclerosis of selected regions of the aorta and right coronary artery. PDAY Research Group. Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:836–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Aloi M, Tromba L, Rizzo V, et al. Aortic intima–media thickness as an early marker of atherosclerosis in children with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;61:41–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Davis PH, Dawson JD, Blecha MB, et al. Measurement of aortic intimal-medial thickness in adolescents and young adults. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:560–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chen KY, Zannino D, Curtis N, et al. Increased aortic intima–media thickness following Kawasaki disease. Atherosclerosis. 2017;260:75–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yano Y, Hoshide S, Inokuchi T, et al. Association between morning blood pressure surge and cardiovascular remodeling in treated elderly hypertensive subjects. Am J Hypertens. 2009;22:1177–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chappell DC, Varner SE, Nerem RM, et al. Oscillatory shear stress stimulates adhesion molecule expression in cultured human endothelium. Circ Res. 1998;82:532–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cho JS, Ihm SH, Kim CJ, et al. Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Watch-PAT 200 is independently associated with an increase in morning blood pressure surge in never-treated hypertensive patients. J Clin Hypertens. 2015;17:675–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sasaki N, Ozono R, Yamauchi R, et al. The relationship between morning hypertension and sleep quality in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2013;35:250–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ayse Selcan Koc
    • 1
  • Ferıde Fatma Gorgulu
    • 1
  • Yurdaer Donmez
    • 2
  • Yahya Kemal Icen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Health Sciences, Adana Health Practice and Research CenterAdanaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of CardiologyUniversity of Health Sciences, Adana Health Practice and Research CenterAdanaTurkey

Personalised recommendations