Skip to main content
Log in

Age-related changes in thickness of anterior lower uterine segment in normal singleton pregnancy during 20–35 weeks’ gestation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To observe age-related changes in the anterior lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness in normal pregnancy from 20 to 35 weeks’ gestation.

Methods

Subjects were 235 uncomplicated singleton cases that underwent single ultrasound examination at 4-week intervals during 20–35 weeks’ gestation. Sagittal LUS sections were evaluated with transvaginal ultrasonography. Anterior LUS thickness (Th) was measured every centimeter from the lowest bladder point (Th0cm) to 4 cm from that point (Th4cm). Th values were standardized by dividing by the Th0cm value. Intragroup comparisons of standardized Th values and intergroup comparisons of actual Th values were made according to gestational age. Statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis and Tukey honest standard deviation tests; significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

In the 20–23-, 24–27- and 32–35-week groups, standardized Th decreased from Th0cm to Th2cm; in the 28–31-week group standardized Th decreased from Th0cm to Th3cm. Median Th3cm values decreased from 5.0 mm at 20–23 weeks to 3.0 mm at 28–31 weeks, but remained unchanged thereafter.

Conclusions

The anterior LUS gradually thinned from Th0cm to Th3cm at 20–35 weeks’ gestation. Th3cm became increasingly thin between 20–23 and 28–31 weeks’ gestation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flamm BL, Goings JR, Liu Y, et al. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:927–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, et al. Systemic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ. 2004;329:19–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2581–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Phillippe HJ, et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet. 1996;347:281–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gotoh H, Masuzaki H, Yoshida A, et al. Predicting incomplete uterine rupture with vaginal sonography during the late second trimester in women with prior cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:596–600.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sen S, Malik S, Salhan S. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients of previous cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;87:215–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheung VY, Constantinescu OC, Ahluwalia BS. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean delivery. J Ultrasound Med. 2004;23:1441–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J, et al. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:320.e1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jastrow N, Gauthier RJ, Gagnon G, et al. Impact of labor at prior cesarean on lower uterine segment thickness in subsequent pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:563.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kok N, Wiersma IC, Opmeer BC, et al. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42:132–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Degani S, Leibovitz Z, Shapiro I, et al. Myometrial thickness in pregnancy: longitudinal sonographic study. J Ultrasound Med. 1998;17:661–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sfakianaki AK, Buhimschi IA, Pettker CM, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of myometrial thickness in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:530.e1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haylen BT, Frazer MI, Sutherst JR, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound in the assessment of bladder volumes in women. Preliminary report. Br J Urol. 1989;63:149–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kessler A, Mitchell DG, Kuhlman K, et al. Myoma vs. contraction in pregnancy: differentiation with color Doppler imaging. J Clin Ultrasound. 1993;21:241–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank S. Kimura, Ph.D., for technical advice with data processing in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiyuki Yoshizato.

Ethics declarations

Ethical statements

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Conflict of interest

There are no financial or other relations that could lead to a conflict of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoshizato, T., Kimura, I., Araki, R. et al. Age-related changes in thickness of anterior lower uterine segment in normal singleton pregnancy during 20–35 weeks’ gestation. J Med Ultrasonics 43, 401–405 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-016-0709-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-016-0709-x

Keywords

Navigation