Journal of Public Health

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 431–440 | Cite as

Impact of population characteristics on Illinois childcare adoption of integrated pest management (IPM)

Original Article

Abstract

Aim

Assess participation of licensed Illinois childcare facilities in integrated pesticide management (IPM) training, IPM understanding and (for trained facilities) implementation relative to local socio-economic characteristics.

Subject and methods

2000 census data were compared to pre- and post-training survey data from childcare facilities to assess the direct and indirect (diffusion) impacts of training through bivariate correlation (Spearman’s Rho), 1-way ANOVA and regression analysis. Socio-economic variables were selected from studies of environmental concern and behavior, extent of pest problems, pesticide use and children’s exposure. Dependent variables included self-reported facility characteristics, pest problems and control, understanding IPM benefits and IPM legislation, and IPM implementation.

Results

For all childcare facilities, training explained 8.9% and socio-economic variables 18% of the variance in understanding IPM benefits. Childcare facilities in urban low socio-economic populations were more likely to suffer from pests, participate in training and understand IPM benefits; however, childcare centers were more likely than smaller facilities and family childcare homes to implement IPM. Private childcare facilities in higher-income populations were less likely to understand IPM benefits from training or other sources, but training led to implementation.

Conclusions

Large government sponsored or private childcare facilities are more likely to implement select IPM practices post-training. Licensed and informal facilities could benefit from on-line IPM training certification programs with inspection requirements and IPM implementation financial assistance, similar to government energy saving programs for small businesses. More research is needed in higher-income populations to assess pesticide use and children’s exposure and need for IPM, to inform intervention programs.

Keywords

IPM Childcare Training Socio-economic Demographic 

References

  1. Adgate JL, Kukowski A, Stroebel C, Shubat PJ, Morrell S, Quackenboss JJ, RW Whitmore, Sexton K (2000) Pesticide storage and use patterns in Minnesota households with children. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 10(2):159–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alarcon WA, Calvert GM, Blondell JM, Mehler LN, Sievert J, Propeck M, Stanbury M (2005) Acute illnesses associated with pesticide exposure at schools. J Am Med Assoc (JAMA) 294(4):455–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Curl CL, Fenske RA, Kissel JC, Shirai JH, Moate TF, Griffith W, Thompson B (2002) Evaluation of take-home organophosphorus pesticide exposure among agricultural workers and their children. Environ Health Perspect 110(12):A787–A792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Daugherty L (2010) Child care choices of Hispanic families. Why aren’t families using center care? PhD Thesis. http://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/2010/RAND_RGSD258.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2007
  5. Davanzo F, Travaglia A, Chiericozzi M, Dimasi V, Sesana F, Faraoni L, Ballard TJ (2001) Pesticide poisoning referred to the poison center of Milan in 1995–1997. Ann 1st Super Santa 37:127–131Google Scholar
  6. Freeman NC, Jimenez M, Reed KJ, Gurunathan S, Edwards RD, Roy A, Lioy PJ (2001) Quantitative analysis of children’s microactivity patterns: the Minnesota Children’s pesticide exposure study. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 11(6):501–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garnier PC (2010) Illinois salary and staffing survey of licensed child care facilities: FY 2009. Illinois Department of Human Services, Springfield, IL. http://www.dhs.state.il.us/page.aspx?item=49144. Accessed 28 June 2007
  8. Garry VF (2004) Pesticides and children. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 198:152–163Google Scholar
  9. Gordon RA, Chase-Lansdale PL (2001) Availability of childcare in the United States: a description and analysis of data sources. Demography 38(2):299–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Green TA, Gouge DH (2008) School IPM 2015: a strategic plan for integrated pest management in schools in the United States. http://www.antcafe.com/documents/IPM_in_Schools_12.08.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2007
  11. Grey CN, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Golding J (2005) The use and disposal of household pesticides. Environ Res 97(1):109–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huddart-Kennedy E, Beckley TM, McFarlane BL, Nadeau S (2009) Rural–urban differences in environmental concern in Canada. Rural Soc 74(3):309–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huen K, Harley K, Brooks J, Hubbard A, Bradman A, Eskenazi A, Holland N (2009) Developmental changes in PON1 enzyme activity in young children and effects of PON1 polymorphisms. Environ Health Perspect 117(10):1632–1638PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Illinois DCFS (2006) Child Care Act study guide. http://www.state.il.us/DCFS/docs/CCActStudy.pdf. Accessed 14 August 2011
  15. Illinois General Assembly (2003) Amendment to Senate Bill 1079. http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicacts/93/PDF/093-0381.pdf. Accessed 7 December 2007
  16. Jacobs DE, Wilson J, Dixon SL, Smith J, Evens A (2009) The relationship of housing and population health: a 30-year retrospective analysis. Environ Health Perspect 117(4):597–604PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Klineberg SL, McKeever M, Rothenbach B (1998) Demographic predictors of environmental concern: it does make a difference how it’s measured. Soc Sci Q 79(4):734–753Google Scholar
  18. Landrigan PJ, Claudio L, Markowitz SB, Berkowitz GS, Brenner BL, Romero H, Woldff MS (1999) Pesticides and inner-city children: exposures, risks, and prevention. Environ Health Perspect 107 (suppl3):431–437. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1566233/ . Accessed 28 June 2007Google Scholar
  19. Lanphear BP, Vorhees CV, Bellinger DC (2005) Protecting children from environmental toxins. PLoS Med 2(3). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1069659/. Accessed 28 June 2007
  20. Logue T, Simmons A, Whelan M (2005) The economic impact of the early care and education industry in Illinois. http://www.policyarchive.org/handle/10207/bitstreams/5704.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2007
  21. Marquart-Pyatt ST (2007) Concern for the environment among general publics: a cross-national study. Soc Nat Resour 20(10):883–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mir DF, Feitelson E (2007) Factors affecting environmental behavior in micro-enterprises: laundry and motor vehicle repair firms in Jerusalem. Int Small Bus J 25(4):383–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mir DF, Finkelstein Y, Tulipano G (2010) Impact of integrated pest management (IPM) training on reducing pesticide exposure in Illinois childcare centers. Neurotoxicology 31(5):621–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morgan MK, Sheldon LS, Croghan CW, Jones PA, Chuang JC, Wilson NK (2007) An observational study of 127 preschool children at their homes and daycare centers in Ohio: environmental pathways to cis- and trans-permethrin exposure. Environ Res 104:266–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. NetRegs (2003) SME-nvironment 2003: a survey to assess environmental behaviors among smaller UK businesses. http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/static/documents/Utility/sme_2003_uk_1409449.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2007
  26. Nye M, Hargreaves T (2009) Exploring the social dynamics of proenvironmental behavior change: a comparative study of intervention process at home and work. J Ind Ecol 14(1):137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Piper C, Owens K (2002) Are schools making the grade? School districts nationwide adopt safer pest management policies. Pesticides and You - Beyond Pesticides/National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides, 22(3):11–20. http://www.beyondpesticides.org/infoservices/pesticidesandyou/Fall%2002/Are%20schools%20making%20the%20grade.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2007
  28. Raudsepp M (2001) Some socio-demographic and scio-psychological predictors of environmentalism. TRAMES 5(55/50), 3:355–367Google Scholar
  29. Rohlman DS, Arcury TA, Quandt SA, Lasarev M, Rothlein J, Travers R, McCauley L (2005) Neurobehavioral performance in preschool children from agricultural and non-agricultural communities in Oregon and North Carolina. NeuroToxicol 26:589–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rolfe H, Metcalfe H, Anderson T, Meadows P (2003) Recruitment and retention of childcare, early years and play workers: research study. Research Report 409, National Institute of Economic and Social Research. http://www.niesr.ac.uk/pdf/child.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2007
  31. Rosenberg R (2008) Reducing pesticide exposure in Illinois childcare center. Internal memo, Safer Pest Control Project, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  32. Saluja G, Early DM, Clifford RM (2002) Demographic characteristics of early childhood teachers and structural elements of early care and education in the United States. Early Childhood Res Practice 4(1). http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v4n1/saluja.html. Accessed 28 June 2007
  33. Sanborn M, Cole D, Kerr K, Vakil C, Sanin LH, Bassil K (2004) Systematic review of pesticide human health effects. The Ontario College of Family Physicians, Toronto. http://www.ocfp.on.ca/local/files/Communications/Current%20Issues/Pesticides/Final%20Paper%2023APR2004.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2007
  34. Small ML, Stark L (2005) Are poor neighborhoods resource deprived? A case study of childcare centers in New York. Soc Sci Q 86(S1):1013–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steer CD, Grey CNB, ALSPAC study team (2006) Socio-demographic characteristics of UK families using pesticides and weed killers. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 16:251–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stern P (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. J Soc Issues 56(3):407–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  38. Tamefuji R (2010) The impact of child care proximity on labor force participation of parents. PhD Thesis, Washington Research Library Consortium. http://aladinrc.wrlc.org/dspace/bitstream/1961/6990/1/51_etd_rt73.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2007
  39. Theodori GL, Luloff AE (2002) Position on environmental issues and engagement in proenvironmental behaviors. Soc Nat Resour 15:471–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tulve NS, Jones PA, Nishioka MG, Fortmann RC, Croghan CW, Zhou JY, Friedman W (2006) Pesticide measurements from the first national environmental health survey of child care centers using a multi-residue GC/MS analysis method. Environ Sci Technol 40:6269–6274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. USEPA (last updated 8 December 2010) Illegal pesticide products. http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/health/illegalproducts/index.htm. Accessed 28 June 2007
  42. USEPA (2011) Pesticide news story: EPA solicits school IPM grant proposal. http://epa.gov/oppfead1/cb/csb_page/updates/2011/ipmgrant.html. Accessed 14 August 2011
  43. Whyatt RM, Camann DE, Kinney PL, Reyes A, Ramirez J, Dietrich J, Perera FP (2002) Residential pesticide use during pregnancy among a cohort of urban minority women. Environ Health Perspect 110(5):507–514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental ScienceTel Hai Academic CollegeUpper GalileeIsrael
  2. 2.Kiryat TivonIsrael

Personalised recommendations