Advertisement

International Economics and Economic Policy

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 211–219 | Cite as

Intangible investments and international business cycles

  • Guido Baldi
  • André Bodmer
Original Paper

Abstract

Intangible capital is an increasingly important factor of production in advanced economies. Governments in Europe and elsewhere promote investment in intangible assets. However, the potential role of intangibles for business cycles and the international transmission of shocks is not well understood. In this paper, we investigate the international business cycle effects of intangible capital. To this aim, we build an otherwise standard two-country real business cycle model augmented by a production sector for intangibles and allow for the non-rivalrous use of intangible capital in the production of final output goods and new intangibles. We find that a model including intangibles is associated with international co-movement of tangible investment, which is a feature observed in the data that many models fail to produce.

Keywords

International business cycles Investment Intangible capital 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous referees for useful comments and suggestions. In addition, comments by various seminar participants are gratefully acknowledged. All remaining errors are the responsibility of the authors. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the institutions to which the authors are affiliated.

References

  1. Ambler S, Cardia E, Zimmermann C (2004) International business cycles: what are the facts? J Monet Econ 51(2):257–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Backus DK, Kehoe PJ, Kydland FE (1992) International real business cycles. J Polit Econ 100(4):745–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baxter M, Farr DD (2005) Variable capital utilization and international business cycles. J Int Econ 65(2):335–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canova F, Ubide AJ (1998) International business cycles, financial markets and household production. J Econ Dyn Control 22(4):545–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corrado C, Haskel J, Iommi M, Jona-Lasinio C (2013) Innovation and intangible investment in Europe, Japan and the United States. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 29(2):261–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corsetti G, Dedola L, Leduc S (2014) The international dimension of productivity and demand shocks in the US economy. J Eur Econ Assoc 12(1):153–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greenwood J, Hercowitz Z, Huffman GW (1988) Investment, capacity utilization, and the real business cycle. Am Econ Rev 78(3):402–17Google Scholar
  8. Heathcote J, Perri F (2002) Financial autarky and international business cycles. J Monet Econ 49(3):601–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johri A, Letendre M-A, Luo D (2011) Organizational capital and the international co-movement of investment. J Macroecon 33(4):511–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kehoe PJ, Perri F (2002) International business cycles with endogenous incomplete markets. Econometrica 70(3):907–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McGrattan ER, Prescott EC (2012) The labor productivity puzzle. Government policies and the delayed economic recoveryGoogle Scholar
  12. McGrattan ER, Prescott EC (2014) A reassessment of real business cycle theory. Am Econ Rev 104(5):177–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Raffo A (2010) Technology shocks: novel implications for international business cycles. International Finance Discussion Papers no. 992, Federal Reserve System (U.S.)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations