Abdominal wall reconstruction: new technology for new techniques

Robotic surgery today



Robotics can overcome some obstacles of conventional laparoscopy and even highly complex procedures become feasible using a minimally invasive approach. Repair of complex ventral hernia using a myofascial flap and mesh augmentation, a technique called transversus abdominis release (TAR), for ventral abdominal hernia repair is one example. Herein, we present our institutional experience with this novel technique.


Patients undergoing robot-assisted TAR for repair of complex ventral hernia between September 2017 and October 2020 were included. Demographic as well as peri- and postoperative details were collected in a prospective database.


A total of 48 (17 female) patients were operated using robot-assisted TAR during the study period. Median BMI was 29 kg/m2 (range: 22.0–40.5), age at operation was 69 years (median; range: 39–79). Duration of the procedure was 242 min (median), length of postoperative hospital stay was 4 days. One on-table complication was observed: during extubation, an audible tear of suture material was heard by OR staff. The patient had to be re-intubated and closure of the ventral defect was now done using an open access. Prolonged respiratory support was necessary in this patient. Urosepsis occurred in one patient following TAR combined with TURB (transurethral resection of bladder cancer), which was treated with intravenous antibiotics. In addition, one patient was re-admitted at 5 weeks postoperatively, suffering from small bowel obstruction which was solved using a minimally invasive approach. Late complications included three seromas (n = 3; 6.3%), one recurrent hernia (2.1%), and one trocar site hernia (2.1%). None of the latter patients needed an operative revision. No patient died.


Robot-assisted TAR for complex ventral hernia repair is a viable option in our setting with low complication and recurrence rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4


  1. 1.

    Pasticier G, Rietbergen JB, Guillonneau B, Fromont G, Menon M, Vallancien G. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men. Eur Urol. 2001;40(1):70–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer. The ROLARR randomized trial. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1569–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Sciannameo F, et al. Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(4):134–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Vorst AL, Kaoutzanis C, Carbonell AM, Franz MG. Evolution and advances in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;7(11):293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bosanquet D, Aboelrahman T, Ansell J, Cornish J, Davies L, Frewer K, et al. Systematic review and meta regression of factors affecting midline incisional hernia rates: an analysis of 14,618 patients. Hernia. 2014;18(suppl 2):S12–S5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Novitsky YW, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB, Rosen MJ. Transversus abdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2012;204(5):709–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Amaral MVFD, Guimaraes JR, Volpe P, Oliveira FMM, Domene CE, Roll S, et al. Robotic Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR): is it possible to offer minimally invasive surgery for abdominal wall complex defects? Rev Col Bras Cir. 2017;44(2):216–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bittner JG 4th, Alrefai S, Vy M, Mabe M, Del Prado PAR, Clingempeel NL. Comparative analysis of open and robotic tranversus abdominis release for ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(2):727–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Martin-Del-Campo LA, Weitz AS, Belyansky I, Novitsky YW. Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus open transversus abdominis release. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(2):840–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dauser B, Hartig N, Vedadinejad M, Kirchner E, Trummer F, Herbst F. Robotic-assisted repair of complex ventral hernia: can it pay off? J Robot Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01078-3.

  11. 11.

    Gibreel W, Sarr MG, Rosen M, Novitsky Y. Technical considerations in performing posterior component separation with transverse abdominis muscle release. Hernia. 2016;20:449–59.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Robin-Lersundi A, Blazquez Hernando L, Lopez-Monclus J, Cidoncha CA, San Miguel Mendez C, Jimenez Cubedo E, et al. How we do it: down to up posterior components separation. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018;403(4):539–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Halka JT, Vasyluk A, Demare A, Iacco A, Janczyk R. Hybrid robotic-assisted transversus abdominis release versus open tranversus abdominis release: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Hernia. 2019;23:37–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sneider D, Yurtkap Y, Kroese LF, Jeekel J, Muysoms FE, Kleinrensink GJ, et al. Anatomical study comparing medialization after Rives-Stoppa. Anterior component separation, and posterior component separation. Surgery. 2019;165(5):996–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Carbonell AM, Warren JA, Prabhu AS, Ballecer CD, Janczyk RJ, Herrera J, et al. Reducing length of stay using robotic-assisted approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative. Ann Surg. 2018;267(29):210–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Gokcal F, Morrison S, Kudis OY. Robotic ventral hernia repair in morbidly obese patients: perioperative and mid-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(8):3540–3549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07142-w. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

  17. 17.

    Krpata D, Blatnim JA, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJJ. Posterior and open anterior components separations: a comparative analysis. Am J Surg. 2012;203:318–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Novitsky YW, Fayezizadeh M, Majumber A, Neupane R, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB. Outcome of posterior component separation with transversus abdominis muscle release and synthetic mesh sublay reinforcement. Ann Surg. 2016;264:226–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Radu VG, Lica M. The endoscopic retromuscular repair of ventral hernia: the eTEP technique and early results. Hernia. 2019;23:945–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Belyansky I, Zahiri HR, Park A. Laparoscopic transversus abdominis release, a novel minimally invasive approach to complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Innov. 2016;23(2):134–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernhard Dauser MD, PhD, FEBS.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

B. Dauser, N. Hartig, S. Ghaffari, M. Vedadinejad, E. Kirchner, and F. Herbst declare that there are no conflicts of interest, sources of financial support, corporate involvement, patent holdings, etc. involved in the research and preparation of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dauser, B., Hartig, N., Ghaffari, S. et al. Abdominal wall reconstruction: new technology for new techniques. Eur Surg (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-020-00688-3

Download citation


  • TAR
  • Robot-assisted
  • Minimally invasiv
  • Complex ventral hernia
  • Complications