Skip to main content
Log in

Update: histopathology-based definition of gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus

Übersicht zur Histologie-basierten Definition der gastroösophagealen Refluxkrankheit

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

GRUNDLAGEN: Die gastroösophageale Refluxkrankheit (GERD) ist mit Zylinderepithel- und Barrett-Ösophagus (BE) assoziiert, aus dem sich ein Adenokarzinom entwickeln kann. Derzeit wird GERD entsprechend einer Mischung aus Symptomen, Endoskopie, Histopathologie und Funktionsdiagnostik definiert. Wir suchten nach einer primär histologie-basierten Definition von GERD. METHODIK: Übersicht rezenter Literatur zu GERD-Histopathologie. ERGEBNISSE: Multi-Level Biopsien vom ösophagogastralen Übergang und die neue Paull-Chandrasoma Histopathologie-Klassifikation von CLE definieren jene mit Reflux und Karzinomrisiko. Man unterscheidet drei abnormale, nondysplastische Mukosatypen zwischen Plattenepithel und Magenschleimhaut: Kardia Mukosa (CM), Oxyntokardia Mukosa (OCM) und CM mit intestinaler Metaplasie (=Barrett's esophagus, mit 0,5% jährlichem Krebsrisiko). Die Häufigkeit von intestinaler Metaplasia (IM) beträgt 15–24 % an einem endoskopisch normalen ösophagogastralen Übergang und findet sich in 100% bei endoskopisch sichtbarem CLE≥5 cm. IM entsteht an der Mukosagrenze (Platten-, Zylindereptithel). Der sog. dilatierte Endstadium Ösophagus ist ein neues Konzept und definiert das GERD-Frühstadium und entsteht durch transiente, Magendehnungs-induzierte Erschlaffungen des unteren Ösophagusphinkters. Permanente Schädigung führt zur Auskleidung mit Zylinderepithel und magenartigem Aussehen. Die Mehrzahl der sog. Kardiakarzinome entstehen auf Basis des dilatierten Endstadium Ösophagus. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN: CLE entsteht durch Reflux und wird zur Krankheit, wenn er mit die Lebensqualität beeinträchtigenden Symptomen und/oder intestinaler Metaplasie bzw. Dysplasie (Krebsrisiko) vergesellschaftet ist. CLE, IM und Dysplasie können endoskopisch nicht ausgeschlossen werden, dies gelingt nur mittels Histopathologie von Biopsien aus dem ösophagogastralen Übergang.

Summary

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with columnar lined esophagus (CLE) and Barrett's esophagus (BE), which may progress towards esophageal adenocarcinoma. Currently a mixture of symptoms, endoscopic and histopathologic criteria and results obtained from esophageal function tests define GERD. We searched for a histopathology-based definition of GERD. METHODS: Review on GERD-histopathology. RESULTS: Multilevel biopsies and the novel Paull-Chandrasoma histopathology-classification of CLE define those with reflux and risk for development of esophageal adenocarcinoma (those with Barrett's esophagus and dysplasia) and list three abnormal nondysplastic epithelia between squamous and gastric oxyntic mucosa: cardiac mucosa (CM), oxyntocardiac mucosa (OCM), and CM with intestinal metaplasia (=Barrett's esophagus, with 0.5% annual cancer risk). Frequency of intestinal metaplasia (IM) is 15–24% at an endoscopically normal junction and increases towards 100% if CLE is ≥5 cm. IM develops at the squamocolumnar junction. Dilated end stage esophagus (DESE) is a novel concept and defines the early stage of reflux disease. The pathophysiology of DESE involves gastric distention-induced shortenings of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) with reflux favoring damage and columnar metaplasia of the most distal esophagus. Over time permanent LES shortening and proximal dislocation of the squamocolumnar junction result in gastric-type appearance of DESE, which is mistaken for proximal stomach. The majority of adenocarcinomas of the "esophagogastric" junction arise within DESE. CONCLUSIONS: CLE is abnormal, results from reflux and is a disease if associated with life quality-impairing symptoms and/or intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia (cancer risk). Presence of CLE, IM, and dysplasia cannot be excluded from endoscopy, but requires histopathology of biopsies from the squamocolumnar junction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Dent J, El-Serag HB, Wallander MA, Johansson S. Epidemiology of gastrooesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut 2005;54:710–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dent J, Brun J, Fendrick AM, Fennerty MB, Janssens J, Kahrilas PJ, Lauritsen K, Reynolds JC, Shaw M, Talley NJ, on behalf of the Genval Workshop Group. An evidence based appraisal of reflux disease management – the Genval workshop report. Gut 1999;44 (Suppl 2):S1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R, and the global consensus group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:1900–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pace F, Porro GB. Clinical spectrum, natural history and epidemiology of GERD. In: Granderath FA, Kamolz Th, Pointner R editors. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, principles of disease, diagnosis and treatment. Wien, New York: Springer; 2006. pp. 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Wykypiel H, Gadenstätter M, Granderath FA, Klingler PJ, Wetscher GJ. Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with respect to reflux induced carcinogenesis. Eur Surg 2002;34:296–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamolz T, Velanovich V. The impact of disease and treatment on health-related quality of life in patients suffering from GERD. In: Granderath FA, Kamolz Th, Pointner R, editors. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, principles of disease, diagnosis and treatment. Wien, New York: Springer; 2006. pp. 287–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenglinger J, Ringhofer C, Eisler M, Devyatko E, Cosentini E, Wrba F, Zacherl J, Riegler M. Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Eur Surg 2006;38:227–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasoma PT. Columnar lined esophagus: what it is and what it tells us. Eur Surg 2006;38:197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma P. Review article: prevalence of Barrett's oesophagus and metaplasia at the gastro-oesophageal junction. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20(Suppl 5):48–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sampliner RE. Barrett's esophagus. In: Granderath FA, Kamolz Th, Pointner R, editors. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, principles of disease, diagnosis and treatment. Wien, New York: Springer; 2006. pp. 65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagergren J, Bergström R, Lindgren A, Nyren O. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 1999;340:825–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solaymani-Dodaran M, Logan RFA, West J, Card T, Coupland C. Risk of oesophageal cancer in Barrett's oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal reflux. Gut 2004;53:1070–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson LA, Watson RGP, Murphy SJ, Johnston BT, Comber H, Guigan JM, Reynolds JV, Murray LJ. Risk factors for Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: results from the FINBAR study. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:1585–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma P, Dent J, Armstrong D, Bergman JJGHM, Gossner L, Hoshihara Y, Jankowski JA, Junghard O, Lundell L, Tytgat GNJ, Vieth M. The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett's esophagus: the Prague C&M criteria. Gastroenterology 2006;131:1392–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faller G, Borchard F, Ell C, Seitz G, Stolte M, Walch A, Rüschoff J. Histopathological diagnosis of Barrett's mucosa and associated neoplasias: results of a consensus conference of the Working Group for Gastroenterological Pathology of the German Society for Pathology on 22 September 2001 in Erlangen. Virchows Arch 2003;443:597–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt RH, Tytgat GH, Malfertheiner P, Fock KM, Heading RC, Katelaris PH, McCarthy DM, McCol KE, Moss SF, Sachs G, Sontag SJ, Thomason ABR, Modlin IM. Whistler summary: "the slow rate of rapid progress". J Clin Gastroenterol 2007;41:539–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer J, Laugier R, Chemali M, Arpurt JP, Boustiere C, Canard JM, Dalbies PA, Gay G, Escourrou J, Napoleon B, Palazzo L, Ponchon T, Richard-Mollard B, Sautereau D, Tucat G, Vedrenne B. French Society of Digestive Endoscopy SFED guideline: monitoring of patients with Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopy 2007;39:840–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spechler SJ, Zeroogian JM, Antonioli DA, Wang HH, Goyal RK. Prevalence of metaplasia at the gastro-oesophageal junction. Lancet 1994;433:1533–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek TJ, Wang H, Antonioli DA, Glickman JN, Odze RD. Pathologic features of reflux and Helicobacter pylori-associated carditis. Am J Pathol 2003;27:960–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odze RD. Unraveling the mystery of the gastroesophageal junction: a pathologist's perspective. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:1853–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morales TG, Bhattacharyya A, Johnson C, Sampliner RE. Is Barrett's esophagus associated with intestinal metaplasia of the gastric cardia? Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92:1818–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weston AP, Krmpotich P, Makdisi WF, Cherian R, Dixon A, McGregor DH, Banerjee SK. Short segment Barrett's esophagus: clinical and histological features, associated endoscopic findings, and association with gastric intestinal metaplasia. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:981–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg 1998;85:1457–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Von Rahden B, Stein HJ, Siewert JR. Surgical management of esophagogastric junction tumors. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:6608–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Labenz J, Nocon M, Lind T, Leodolter A, Jaspersen D, Meyer-Sabellek W, Stolte M, Vieth M, Willich SN, Malfertheiner P. Prospective follow up data from the ProGERD study suggest that GERD is not a categorial disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2457–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Long JD, Orlando RC. Nonerosive reflux disease. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 2007;53:127–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeVault KR. Review article: the role of acid suppression in patients with non-erosive reflux disease or functional heartburn. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;23 (Suppl 1):33–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl H, Welch HG. The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:142–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pera M, Manterola C, Vidal O, Grande L. Epidemiology of esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2005;92:151–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ringhofer C, Hackl M, Lenglinger J, Riegler M, Prager G, Zacherl J. Epidemiology of esophageal, cardiac and gastric carcinoma in Austria. Eur Surg 2007;39(Suppl 215):11 (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasoma PT, DeMeester TR. Prevalence of reflux-induced adenocarcinoma. In: Chandrasoma P, DeMeestev T, editors. GERD, Reflux to adenocarcinoma. Amsterdam: Academic Press, Elsevier; 2006. pp. 6–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasoma PT. Epidemiology of reflux-induced cancer. In: Chandrasoma P, editor. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, a new histology-based method. Amsterdam: Academic Press, Elsevier; 2007. pp. 2–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Öberg S, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Chandrasoma P, Hagen JA, Ireland AP, Ritter MP, Mason RJ, Crookes P, Bremner CG. Inflammation and specialized intestinal metaplasia of cardiac mucosa is a manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 1997;226:522–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orlando R, Dobrucali AM. Gastroesophageal reflux disease. In: Feldman M, Orlando R, editors. Atlas of esophageal diseases. 2nd ed. Current Medicine, Philadelphia; 2002. pp. 91–116

  • Lenglinger J, Ringhofer C, Eisler M, Sedivy R, Wrba F, Zacherl J, Cosentini EP, Prager G, Heafner M, Riegler M. Histopathology of columnar lined esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2007;119:405–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ringhofer C, Lenglinger J, Eisler M, Wrba F, Sedivy R, Zacherl J, Cosentini EP, Prager G, Devyatko E, Riegler M. Videoendoscopy and histopathology of the esophagogastric junction in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2007;119:283–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allison PR, Johnstone AS. The esophagus lined with gastric mucous membrane. Thorax 1953;87:90–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergun GA, Kahrilas PJ. Esophageal muscular anatomy and physiology. In: Feldman M, Orlando R, editors. Atlas of esophageal diseases. 2nd ed. Current Medicine, Philadelphia; 2002. pp. 2–18

  • Chandrasoma PT. Definition of normal and reflux-induced anatomy and histology. In: Chandrasoma P, editor. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, a new histology-based method. Amsterdam: Academic Press, Elsevier; 2007. pp. 112–56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Theisen J, Nigro JJ, DeMeester TR, Peters JH, Gastal OL, Hagen JA, Hashemi M, Bremner CG. Chronology of the Barrett's metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence. Dis Esoph 2004;17:67–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Csendes A, Smok G, Burdiles P, Sagastune H, Rojas J, Puente G, Quezada F, Korn O. "Carditis": an objective histological marker for pathologic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dis Esophagus 1998;11:101–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mashimo H, Wagh MS, Goyal RK. Surveillance and screening for Barrett esophagus and adenocarcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005;39 (Suppl 2):S33–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jain R, Aquino D, Harford WV, Lee E, Spechler SJ. Cardiac epithelium is found infrequently in the gastric cardia. Gastroenterology 1998;114:A160 (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mas C R, Kraemer M, Seifert M, Rippin G, Vieth M, Stolte M. Short Barrett: prevalence and risk factors. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999;34:1065–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marsman WA, van Sandick JW, Tygat GNJ, ten Kate FJW, van Lanschot JJB. The presence and mucin histochemistry of cardiac type mucosa at the esophagogastric junction. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:212–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasoma PT, Der R, Dalton P, Kobayashi G, Ma Y, Peters J, DeMeester T. Distribution and significance of epithelial types in columnar lined esophagus. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25:1188–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasoma PT, DeMeester TR. Histologic definitions and diagnosis of epithelial types. In: Chandrasoma P, DeMeestev T, editors. GERD, Reflux to adenocarcinoma. Amsterdam: Academic Press, Elsevier; 2006. pp. 89–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuta T, Mukaisho KI, Sugihara H, Miwa K, Tani T, Hattori T. Expression of Cdx2 in early GRCL of Barrett's esophagus induced in rats by duodenal reflux. Dig Dis Sci 2005;50:425–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasoma PT, Der R, Ma Y, Peters J, DeMeester T. Histologic classification of patients based on mapping biopsies of the gastroesophageal junction. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:929–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Csendes A, Smok G, Burdiles P, Korn O, Gradiz M, Rojas J, Recio M. Prevalence of intestinal metaplasia according to the length of the specialized columnar epithelium lining the distal esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux. Dis Esophagus 2003;16:24–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasoma PT. Assessment of treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. In: Chandrasoma P, editor. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, a new histology-based method. Amsterdam: Academic Press, Elsevier; 2007. pp. 274–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Csendes A, Maluenda F, Braghetto I, Csendes P, Henriquez A, Quesada MS. Location of the lower esophageal sphincter and the squamous columnar mucosal junction in 109 healthy controls and 778 patients with different degrees of endoscopic oesophagitis. Gut 1993;34:21–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lord RV, Wickramasinghe K, Johansson JJ, DeMeester SR, Brabender J, DeMeester TR. Cardiac mucosa in the remnant esophagus after esophagectomy is an acquired epithelium with Barrett's-like features. Surgery 2004;136:633–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oberg S, Johansson J, Wenner J, Walther B. Metaplastic columnar mucosa in the cervical esophagus after esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2002;235:338–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dresner SM, Griffin SM, Wayman J, Bennett MK, Hayes N, Raimes SA. Human model of duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux in the development of Barrett's metaplasia. Br J Surg 2003;90:1120–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasoma P, DeMeester TR. Reflux disease limited to the dilated end-stage esophagus: the pathologic basis of NERD. In: Chandrasoma P, DeMeestev T, editors. GERD, Reflux to adenocarcinoma. Amsterdam: Academic Press, Elsevier; 2006. pp. 267–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahrilas PJ, Shi G, Manka M, Joehl RJ. Increased frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation induced by gastric distention in reflux patients with hiatal hernia. Gastroenterology 2000;118:688–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milano F, van Baal JWPM, Buttar NS, Rygiel AM, de Kort F, DeMars CJ, Rosmolen WD, Bergman JJGHM, van Marle J, Wank KK, Peppelenbosch MP, Krishnadath KK. Bone morphogenetic protein 4 expressed in esophagitis induces a columnar phenotype in esophageal squamous cells. Gastroenterology 2007;132:2412–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnadath KK. Novel findings in the pathogenesis of esophageal columnar metaplasia or Barrett's esophagus. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2007;23:440–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasoma P, Makarewicz K, Wickramsinghe K, Ma Y, DeMeester T. A proposal for a new validated histological definition of the gastroesophageal junction. Hum Pathol 37:40–7

  • Sarbia M, Donner A, Gabbert HE. Histopathology of the gastroesophageal junction. A study on 36 operation specimens. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:1207–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasoma P, Wickramasinghe K, Ma Y, DeMeester T. Adenocarcinomas of the distal esophagus and "gastric cardia" are predominantly esophageal adenocarcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2007;31:569–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siewert JR, Feith M, Werner M, Stein HJ. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1002 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2000;232:353–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasoma P, Wickramasinghe K, Ma Y, DeMeester T. Is intestinal metaplasia a necessary precursor lesion for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus, gastroesophageal junction and gastric cardia? Dis Esophagus 2007;20:36–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Portale G, Hagen JA, Peters JH, Chan LS, DeMeester SR, Gandamihardja TAK, DeMeester TR. Modern 5-year survival of respectable adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients. Am Coll Surg 2006;202:588–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasoma PT. Quick biopsy protocol for the busy gastroenterologist. In: Chandrasoma P, DeMeestev T, editors. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, a new histology-based method. Amsterdam: Academic Press, Elsevier; 2007. pp. 252

    Google Scholar 

  • Theisen J, Stein HJ, Feith M, Kauer WKH, Dittler HJ, Pirchi D, Siewert JR. Preferred location for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma within a segment of intestinal metaplasia. Surg Endosc 2006;20:235–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad GA, Buttar NS, Wongkeesong LM, Lewis JT, Sanderson SO, Lutzke LS, Borkenhagen LS. Wang KK. Significance of neoplastic involvement of margins obtained by endoscopic mucosal resection in Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad GA, Wang KK, Buttar NS, Wongkeesong LM, Krishnadath KK, Nichols FC III, Lutzke LS, Borkenhagen LS. Long-term survival following endoscopic and surgical treatment of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 2007;132:1226–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wykypiel H, Bonatti H, Hinder RA, Glaser K, Wetscher GJ. The laparoscopic fundoplications: Nissen and partial posterior (Toupet) fundoplication. Eur Surg 2006;38:244–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Rahden BH, Stein HJ. Endoscopic treatment modalities for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Eur Surg 2006;38:262–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamhankar AP, Peters JH, Portale G, Hsieh CC, Hagen JA, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR. Omeprazole does not reduce gastroesophageal reflux: new insights using multichannel intraluminal impedance technology. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8:890–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter WL, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Crookes PF, Tsai P, Bank F, Bremner CG. Lomg-term outcome of antireflux surgery in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Ann Surg 2001;234:532–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parilla P, Martinez de Haro LF, Ortiz A, Munitz V, Molina J, Bermejo J, Canteras M. Long-term results of a randomized prospective study comparing medical and surgical treatment of Barrett's esophagus. Ann Surg 2003;237:291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi M, Barreca M, Bortoli N, Renzi C, Santi S, Gennai A, Bellini M, Costa F, Conio M, Marchi S. Efficacy of Nissen fundoplication versus medical therapy in the regression of low-grade dysplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Ann Surg 2006;243:58–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chang EY, Morris CD, Seltman AK, O'Rourke RW, Chan BK, Hunter JG, Jobe BA. The effect of antireflux surgery on esophageal carcinogenesis in patients with Barrett esophagus. Ann Surg 2007;246:11–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lagergren J, Viklund RN. Is esophageal adenocarcinoma occurring late after antireflux surgery due to persistent postoperative reflux? World J Surg 2007;31:465–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraris R, Fracchia M, Foti M, Sidoli L, Taraglio S, Vigano L, Giaccone C, Rebecchi F, Meineri G, Senore C, Pera A, Gruppo operativo studio precancerosi esofagee. Barrett's oesophagus: long-term follow-up after complete ablation with argon plasma coagulation and the factors that determine its recurrence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;25:835–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zacherl J, Neumayer C, Langer F. Esophageal cancer: international guidelines in interdisciplinary diagnosis and treatment. Eur Surg 2006;38:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos GK, Yao K, Kave P, Hawkey CJ, Ragunath K. Novel endoscopic observation in Barrett's esophagus using high resolution magnification endoscopy and narrow band imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;26:501–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Aquirre AD, Hsiung PL, Desai S, Herz PR, Redrosa M, Huang O, Fiqueiredo M, Huang SW, Koski A, Schmitt JM, Fujimoto JG, Mashimo H. Ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography of Barrett's esophagus: preliminary descriptive clinical study correlating images with histology. Endoscopy 2007;39:599–605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Becker V, Vercauteren T, Hann von Weyhern C, Prinz C, Schmid RM, Meining A. High-resolution miniprobe-based confocal microscopy in combination with video mosaicing (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2007;66:1001–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Riegler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lenglinger, J., Eisler, M., Wrba, F. et al. Update: histopathology-based definition of gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus. Eur Surg 40, 165–175 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-008-0415-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-008-0415-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation