Abstract
Our research was carried out to determine the effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on the yield and quality parameters of tomato plants in organic farming conditions. In our study, Bacillus megaterium M‑3, Paenibacillus polymxa, Burkholderia cepacia, Azospirillum sp-245 bacterial strains were applied by three different applications methods such as to the soil, root region and leaves. The research was carried out as field experiment in 37 plots and 10 plants per plot. As a result of the study, it was determined that different PGPR applications significantly affect the yield and quality parameters of tomato plant in organic agriculture. When the results were evaluated, the highest yield was obtained as 1533 kg da−1 with foliar application of B. megaterium M‑3 bacteria. B. megaterium M‑3 bacteria application to leaves increased that yield by about 20% compared to the control. It was determined that the bacteria applications did not have any significant effect on fruit size, fruit width and fruit weight. However, PGPR applications increased the amount of plant nutrients in the leaf, and pH, soluble solid contents (SSC), the rate of titratable acidity and the vitamin C values in the fruit. In conclusion, some PGPR bacteria as B. megaterium M‑3, P. polymxa, B. cepacia, A. sp-245 increased the yield of the product and have a positive effect on quality parameters. As a result of the PCA (principal component analysis), PC1 alone explained 35% of the total variance and PC2 explained 24%. PC1 was found to be associated with soluble solid matter, vitamin C, titratable acidity, pH and EC, PC2 was found to be fruit yield and marketable yield, and PC3 was found to be scrap yield and marketable yield ratio.
Zusammenfassung
Unsere Forschung wurde durchgeführt, um die Auswirkungen von pflanzenwachstumsfördernden Bakterien (plants growth promoting rhizobacteria, PGPR) auf die Ertrags- und Qualitätsparameter von Tomatenpflanzen im ökologischen Landbau zu untersuchen. In unserer Studie wurden verschiedene Bakterienstämme (Bacillus megaterium M‑3, Paenibacillus polymxa, Burkholderia cepacia und Azospirillum sp-245) in drei verschiedenen Applikationsmethoden getestet (Boden, Wurzelregion und Blätter). Die Forschung wurde als Feldversuch mit 37 Parzellen und 10 Pflanzen pro Parzelle durchgeführt. Als Ergebnis der Studie wurde festgestellt, dass verschiedene PGPR-Anwendungen den Ertrag und die Qualitätsparameter von Tomatenpflanzen im ökologischen Landbau signifikant beeinflussen. Bei Auswertung der Ergebnisse wurde der höchste Tomatenertrag mit 1533 kg da−1 bei Blattapplikation von B. megaterium M‑3-Bakterien erzielt, was einer Ertragszunahme von 20 % im Vergleich zur Kontrolle entsprach. Die Bakterienanwendungen hatten keinen signifikanten Effekt auf Fruchtgröße, Fruchtbreite und Fruchtgewicht. PGPR-Anwendungen erhöhten jedoch die Konzentration an Pflanzennährstoffen im Blatt, den pH-Wert, den Gehalt an löslichen Feststoffen, die Konzentration titrierbarer Säure und den Vitamin-C-Gehalt in den Früchten. Zusammenfassend lässt sich sagen, dass einige PGPR-Bakterien, wie B. megaterium M‑3, P. polymxa, B. cepacian und A. sp-245, den Tomatenertrag erhöhten und sich positiv auf die Qualitätsparameter auswirkten. Als Ergebnis der Hauptkomponentenanalyse (principal component analysis, PCA) erklärte PC1 allein 35 % der Gesamtvarianz und PC2 24 %. Es wurde festgestellt, dass PC1 mit löslichen Feststoffen, Vitamin C, titrierbarer Säure, pH-Wert und elektrischer Leitfähigkeit assoziiert ist, PC2 mit dem Fruchtertrag und dem marktfähigen Ertrag und PC3 mit dem Ausschuss und der marktfähigen Renditenquote.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbas Z, Okon Y (1993) Plant growth promotion by Azotobacter paspali in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1075–1083
Ahemad M, Kibret M (2014) Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective. J King Saud Univ Sci 26:1–20
Anonymous (2002) Determination of titratable acidity of fruit and vegetable products, TS 1125 ISO 750. Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara
Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen total. Methods of soil analysis part2. Chemical and microbiological properties second edition. Agronomy 9(Part 2):597–622
Caballero-Mellado J, Onofre-Lemus J, Santos PEL, Martiinez-Aguilar L (2007) The tomatorhizosphere, an environment rich in nitrogen-fixing Burkholderia species with capabilities ofinterest for agriculture and bioremediation. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5308–5319
Cakmakci R (2005a) Use of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria in agriculture. Ataturk Uni. J Agric Fac 36(1):97–107
Cakmakci R (2005b) Posphate Solubilizing Bacteria and Their Role In Plant Growth Promotion. J Agric Fac 19(35):93–108
Cakmakci R, Erdogan U (2006) Recent developments in the use of plant growth promoter rhizobacteria: organic agriculture perspective and applications. Organic Agriculture Cong, Yalova
Cakmakci R, Kantar F, Şahin F (2001) Effect of N2-fixing bacterial İnoculations on yield of sugar beet and barley. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 164(5):527–531
Çakmakçi R, Dönmez F, Aydın A, Şahin F (2006) Growth promotion of plants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under greenhouse and two different field soil conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38(6):1482–1487
Cakmakci R, Erat M, Erdoğan Ü, Dönmez F (2007) The influence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on growth and enzyme activities in wheat and spinach plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 170:288–295
Çakmakçı R, Dönmez M, Ertürk Y, Erat M, Haznedar A, Sekban R (2010) Diversity and metabolic potential of culturable bacteria from the rhizosphere of Turkish tea grown in acidic soils. Plant and Soil 332(1/2):299–318
Cemeroğlu B (1992) Basic analysis methods in fruit and vegetable processing industry. Biltav University Books Series, No: 02‑2. Biltav University, Ankara
Chaban IA, Kononenko NV, Gulevich AA, Bogoutdinova LR, Khaliluev MR, Baranova EN (2020) Morphological features of the anther development in tomato plants with non-specific male sterility. Biology 9(2):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9020032
Chabot R, Antoun H, Cescas MP (1993) Stimulation de la croissance du maïs et de la laitue romaine par des microorgan- ismes dissolvant le phosphore inorganique. Can J Microbiol 39:941–947
Erman M, Kotan R, Çakmakçı R, Çığ F, Karagöz K, Sezen M (2010) Effect of nitrogen fixing and phosphate-solubilizing Rhizobacteria isolated from Van Lake Basin on the growth and quality properties in wheat and sugar beet. Turkey IV. Organic Farming Symposium, 28 June – 1 July, Erzurum, Turkey, 325–329
Esitken A, Ercisli S, Sevik İ, Sahin F (2003b) Effect of indole-3-butyric acid and different strains of agrobacterium rubi on adventitive root formation from softwood and semi-hardwood wild sour cherry cuttings. Turk J Agric For 27:37–42
Esitken A, Kalidag H, Ercisli S, Turan M, Sahin F (2003a) The effects of spraying a growth promoting bacterium on the yield, growth and nutrient element composition of leaves of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.cv. Hacıhaliloglu). Aust J Agric Res 54:377–380
Esitken A, Karlidag H, Ercisli S, Sahin F (2002) Effects of foliar application of Bacillus substilis Osu-142 on the yield, growth and control of shot-hole disease (Coryneum blight) of apricot. Gartenbauwissenschaft 67:139–142
Esitken A, Yildiz HE, Ercisli S, Donmez M, Turan M, Gunes A (2010) Effects of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) on yield, growth and nutrient contents of organically grown strawberry. Scientia Horticulturae 124(1):62–66
Freitas ADS, Vieira CL, Santos CERS, Stamford NP, Lyra MCCP (2007) Caracterização de rizóbios isolados de Jacatupé cultivado em solo salino no Estado de Pernanbuco, Brasil. Bragantia 66:497–504 (article in Portuguese)
Ganzalez-Cebrino F, Lozano M, Ayuso MC, Bernalte MJ, Vidal-Aragon MC, Gonzalez-Gomez D (2011) Characterization of traditional tomato varieties grown in organic conditions. Span J Agric Res 9(2):444–452
Gee GW, Hortage KH (1986) Particle size analysis. Methods of soil analysis. Part physical and minerological methods second edition. Agronomy 9(2):383–441
Güneş A, Ataoğlu N, Turan M, Eşitken A, Ketterings QM (2009) Effects of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms on strawberry yield and nutrient concentrations. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:385–392
Güneş A, Karagöz K, Turan M, Kotan R, Yıldırım E, Çakmakçı R, Şahin F (2015) Fertilizer efficiency of some plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria for plant growth. Res J Soil Biol 7(2):28–45
Güneş A, Turan M, Güllüce M, Şahin F, Karaman MR (2013) Effects of different bacteria application on solubility of rock phosphate. Soil Water J 2(1):53–61
Jackson ML (1962) Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc. Eaglewood Cliffs, USA. pp 219–221
Khalid A, Arshad M, Shaharoona B, Mahmoud T (2009) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and sustainable agriculture. In: Khan MS et al (ed) Microbial strategies for crop improvement. Springer, Berlin https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01979-1_7
Khalid A, Arshad M, Zahir ZA (2004) Screening plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for improving growth and yield of wheat. J Appl Microbiol 96(3):473–480
Kidoğlu F, Gul A, Özaktan H, Tuzel Y (2008) Effect of rhizobacteria on plant growth of different vegetables. Proc. International Symp. High Tech. Gren. System Manag. Acta Hortic 801:1471–1477
Kotan R, Cakir A, Dadasoglu F, Aydin T, Cakmakci R, Ozer H, Kordali S, Mete E, Dikbas N (2010) Antibacterial activities of essential oils and extracts of Turkish and species against plant pathogenic bacteria. J Science Food Agriculture 90(1):145–160
Kotan R, Sahin F, Demirci E, Özbek A, Eken C, Miller SA (1999) Evaluation of antagonistic bacteria for biological control of Fusarium dry rot of potato. Phytopathology, 89(6):41
Lindsay WL, Norvell WA (1978) Development of a DTPA Soil Test for Zinc, Iron, Manganese, and Copper. Soil Science Soc America J 42(3):421–428
Lucy M, Reed E, Glick BR (2004) Application of free living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 86(1):1–25
Mclean EO (1982) Soil pH and lime requirement. Methods of soil analysis part2. Chemical and microbiological properties second edition. Agronamy 9(Part 2):199–224
Mena-Violante HG, Olalde-Portugal V (2007) Alteration of tomato fruit quality by root inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) Bacillus subtilis BEB-13bs. Sci Hortic 113:103–106
Mia MAB, Shamsuddin ZH, Mahmood M (2012) Effects of rhizobia and plant growth promoting bacteria inoculation on germination and seedling vigor of lowland rice. Afr J Biotechnol 11:3758–3765
Miransari M (2013) Soil microbes and availability of soil nutrients. Acta Physiol Plant 35:3075–3084
Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982) Organic matter. Methods of soil analysis part2. Chemical and microbiological properties second edition. Agronamy 9(Part 2):574–579
Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA circular 939. US Government Printing Office, Washington DC
Singh DB, Singh HB, Prabha R (2016) Microbial Inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity. Springer, Delhi https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2647-5
Şahin F, Cakmakci R, Kantar F (2004) Sugarbeet and barley yields in relation to inoculation with N2-fixing and phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Plant Soil 265:123–129
Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. Elsevier, New York, p 605
Straka RP, Stokes JL (1957) Rapid destruction of bacteria in commonly used diluentes and its elimination. Appl Environ Microbiol 5:21–25
Sumner ME, Miller WP (1996) Cation Exchange Capacity and Exchange Coefficients. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3: Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Series 5, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, 1201–1230
Thomas GW (1982) Exchangable cations, In: A.I.Page, R.H. Mille and D.R. Keeney (Eds), Methods of soil analysis 2, Agronomy monograph No. 9. 2nd Edition American Society of Agronomy Madison, WI. U.S.A. pp 159–165
Tilak KVBR, Ranganayaki N, Pal KK, De R, Saxena AK, Shekhar NC, Mittal S, Tripathi AK, Johri BN (2005) Diversity of plant growth and soil health supporting bacteria. Curr Sci 89:136–150
Turan M, Ataoglu N, Sahin F (2007) Effects of Bacillus FS‑3 on growth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) plants and availability of phosphorus in soil. Plant Soıl Envıronment 53(2):58–64
Turan M, Ataoğlu N, Sezen Y (2004) Phosphorus-degrading bacteria (Bacillus megaterium), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) effects on yield and phosphorus uptake of crops. Turkey 3rd National Fertilizer Congress, Agriculture-Industry-Environment, Tokat, 11–13 October. vol 1, pp 939–944
Turan M, Ekinci M, Yildirim E, Gunes A, Karagoz K, Kotan R, Dursun A (2014) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria improved growth, nutrient, and hormone content of cabbage (Brassica oleracea) seedlings. Turk J Agric For 38(3):327–333
Vessey JK (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255:571–586
Yildirim E, Karlidag H, Turan M, Dursun A, Goktepe F (2011) Growth, nutrient uptake and yield promotion of broccoli by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria with manure. Hort Science 46:932–936
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Erciyes University BAP (FYL-2017-7209) for providing financial support in conducting this study. We also thank Assist. Prof. Dr. Erman Beyzi, for the PCA used in the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
B. Yagmur and A. Gunes declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yagmur, B., Gunes, A. Evaluation of the Effects of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on Yield and Quality Parameters of Tomato Plants in Organic Agriculture by Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Gesunde Pflanzen 73, 219–228 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-021-00543-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-021-00543-9