Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison between two alternative harvesting systems in the thinning of fast-growing pine plantations under the conditions of low labour cost

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparative study was conducted in the second commercial thinning of a 12-year-old slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) plantation in South Africa. The goal of the study was to compare semi-mechanized tree-length harvesting with fully mechanized cut-to-length (CTL harvesting) in terms of: compliance with silvicultural prescriptions, value and volume recovery, productivity, cost and residual stand damage. The two systems were tested on 32 adjacent plots with a mean surface of 4000 m2 each. Plots were randomly allocated to the two treatments, so that each treatment was replicated 16 times. The experiment consisted of a classic time study, followed by the visual inspection of all plots for determining damage frequency and severity. While mechanization allowed a dramatic (tenfold) increase in worker productivity, it also resulted in a proportional increase in team cost, which offset the large efficiency benefit and ended up with both methods incurring similar production cost (180–200 ZAR m3). However, mechanized CTL harvesting resulted in a significant reduction in residual stand damage frequency (from 5.2 to 2.9%) and severity (28% smaller wounds). Mechanized CTL is preferable, because it can reduce the frequency and severity of residual stand damage. In social terms, however, mechanization reduces employment potential but promotes job quality, while conventional harvesting solutions can employ many more people, but offer low-paid, tiresome and potentially hazardous jobs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman SA, Seifert S, Ackerman PA et al (2016) Mechanized pine thinning harvesting simulation: productivity and cost improvements as a result of changes in planting geometry. Croat J For Eng 37:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Acuna M, Kellogg L (2009) Evaluation of alternative cut-to-length harvesting technology for native forest thinning in Australia. Int J For Eng 20:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Aho P, Fiddler G, Filip G (1989) Decay losses associated with wounds in commercially thinned true fir stands in northern California. USDA Forest Service Research Paper PNW-403. 8 p

  • Asikainen A, Anttila P, Verkerk H, Diaz O, Röser D (2011) Development of forest machinery and labour in the EU in 2010-2030. In: Proceedings of the 44th international FORMEC conference, October 9–13, Graz, Austria. 8 p. https://www.formec.org/proceedings/25-austria-2011-proceedings.html. Accessed 29 Apr 2018

  • Bell J (2002) Changes in logging injury rates associated with use of feller-bunchers in West Virginia. J Saf Res 33:463–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björheden R, Apel K, Shiba M, Thompson M (1995) IUFRO forest work study nomenclature. Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Department of Operational Efficiency, Garpenberg. 16 p

  • Bobik M (2008) Damage to residual stand in commercial thinnings. Southern swedish Forest Research Centre, SLU Master Thesis no 127, Alnarp, Sweden. 32 p

  • Boston K, Murphy G (2003) Value recovery from two mechanized operations in the southeastern United States. South J Appl For 27:259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford JB, Palik BJ (2009) A comparison of thinning methods in red pine: consequences for stand level growth and tree diameter. Can J For Res 39:489–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredenkamp B (2000) Volume and mass of logs and standing trees. In: Owen DL (ed) South African forestry handbook 2000, vol 1, 4th edn. South African Institute of Forestry, Pretoria, pp 167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulman D, Eden M, Nguyen H (2017) Transitioning from low-income growth to high-income growth: is there a middel-income trap? J Asia Pac Econ 22:5–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camp A (2002) Damage to residual trees by four mechanized harvest systems operating in small-diameter, mixed-conifer forests on steep Slopes in Northeastern Washington: a case study. West J Appl For 17:14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey P, Murphy G (2005) Mechanized versus manual log-making in two Chilean Pinus radiata stands. N Z J For Sci 35:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossens P (1991) Operator log makingg ability on mechanized processor. Logging Industry Research association, Rotorua, New Zealand, LIRA Technical Report 16 (14)

  • Erasmus D (1994) National terrain classification for forestry. Institute for Commercial Forestry Research (ICFR). ICFR, Scottsville, bulletin series, 11, 94

  • Eriksson M, Lindroos O (2014) Productivity of harvesters and forwarders in CTL operations in northern Sweden based on large follow-up datasets. Int J For Eng 25:179–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans J (1992) Plantation forestry in the tropics: tree planting for industrial, social, environmental, and agroforestry purposes. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields G (2010) Labor market analysis for developing countries. Cornell University, ILR School Working Paper 157, Cornell, NY, USA. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/workingpapers/157. 17 p. Accessed 29 Apr 2018

  • Froese K, Han H (2006) Residual stand damage from cut-to-length thinning of a mixed conifer stand in Northern Idaho. West J Appl For 21:142–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullberg T (1995) Evaluating operator-machine interactions in comparative time studies. Int J For Eng 7:51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Han HS, Kellogg LD (2000) Damage characteristics in young douglas-fir stands from commercial thinning with four timber harvesting systems. West J Appl For 15(1):27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han HS, Kellogg LD, Filip G et al (2000) Scar closure and future timber value losses from thinning damage in western Oregon. For Prod J 50:36

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitzman E, Grell AG (2002) Residual tree damage along forwarder trails from cut-to-length thinning in Maine spruce stands. North J Appl For 19:161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzscher MA, Lanford BL (1997) Tree diameter effects of cost and productivity of cut-to-length systems. For Prod J 47:25

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Krueger KW (1962) Decay associated with thinning wounds in young-growth western hemlock and douglas-fir. J For 60:336–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson SM, Fredericksen TS, Malcom JR (2002) Area disturbed and residual stand damage following logging in a Bolivian tropical forest. For Eco Manag 166:271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg L, Bettinger P (1994) Thinning productivity and cost for a mechanized cut-to-length system in the northwest pacific coast region of the USA. J For Eng 5:43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr G, Haufe J (2011) Thinning practice: a silvicultural guide. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Koŝir B (2008) Modelling stand damage and comparison of two harvesting methods. Croat J For Eng 29:5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Laitila J (2008) Harvesting technology and the cost of fuel chips from early thinnings. Silva Fenn 42:267–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall S, Harris S, Zmarak S (2006) Rural-urban migration in developing countries: a survey of theoretical prediction and empirical finding. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3915:1–44

  • Lanford B, Stokes B (1995) Comparison of two thinning systems. Part 1. Stand and site impacts. For Prod J 45:74–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroos O, La Hera P, Häggström C (2017) Drivers of advances in mechanized timber harvesting—a selective review of technological innovation. Croat J For Eng 38:243–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Magagnotti N, Kanzian C, Schulmeyer F, Spinelli R (2011) A new guide for work studies in forestry. Int J For Eng 24:249–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Magagnotti N, Spinelli R, Güldner O, Erler J (2012) Site impact after motor-manual and mechanized thinning in Mediterranean pine plantations. Biosys Eng 113:140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall H, Murphy G, Boston K (2006) Evaluation of the economic impacts of length and diameter measurement error on mechanical harvesters and processors operating in pine stands. Can J For Res 36:1661–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan A, Magagnotti N, Spinelli R (2016) The effects of number of stems per stool on cutting productivity in coppiced Eucalyptus plantations. Silva Fenn 50(2):1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcneel J, Ballard T (1992) Analysis of site stand impacts from thinning with a harvester-forwarder system. J For Eng 4:23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng W (1978) Baumverletzungen durch transportvorgaenge bei der holzernte: ausmass und verteilung, folgeschaeden am holz und versuch ihrer bewertung. Schriftenreihe der landesforstverwaltung baden-wuerttemberg (Germany)

  • Murphy G (2003) Mechanization and value recovery: worldwide experiences. In: Proceedings of the wood for Africa forest engineering conference, July 2002, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. pp 23–32. OSU, Forest Engineering Department, Corvallis, Oregon

  • Nichols M, Lemin R Jr, Ostrofsky w (1994) The impact of two harvesting systems on residual stems in a partially cut stand of northern hardwoods. Can J For Res 24:350–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrofsky W, Seymour R, Lemin R Jr. (1986) Damage to northern hardwoods from thinning using whole-tree harvesting technology. Can J For Res 16:1238–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker R, Park R, Clement B, Gibbons W (1995) Effect of number of log grades on log making errors. LIRO Report 20. 7 p. Rotorua, New Zealand

  • Picchio R, Neri F, Maesano M et al (2011) Growth effects of thinning damage in a corsican pine (Pinus laricio poiret) stand in central italy. For Ecol Manag 262:237–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purfürst T, Lindroos O (2011) The correlation between long-term productivity and short-term performance ratings of harvester operators. Croat J For Eng 32:509–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramantswana M, McEwan A, Pauw J (2012) Determining the effect of tree size, bark-wood bond strength and tree form on the productivity of an excavator-based harvester in Acacia mearnsii in the KwaZulu-Natal forestry region of South Africa. South For: J For Sci 74(3):151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1999) StatView Reference. SAS Publishing, Cary, NC. ISBN-1-58025-162-5. pp. 84-93

  • Scott A (1973) Work measurement: observed time to standard time. For Comm Bull 47:26–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Magagnotti N (2011a) The effects of introducing modern technology on the financial, labour and energy performance of forest operations in the Italian Alps. For Policy Econ 13(7):520–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Magagnotti N (2011b) The effects of introducing modern technology on the financial, labour and energy performance of a mobile chipper. Silva Fenn 45(1):85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Visser R (2008) Analyzing and estimating delays in harvester operations. Int J For Eng 19:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Visser RJM (2009) Analyzing and estimating delays in wood chipping operations. Biomass Bioenerg 33(3):429–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Ward SM, Owende PM (2009) A harvest and transport cost model for Eucalyptus spp. fast-growing short rotation plantations. Biomass Bioenerg 33(9):1265–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Hartsough B, Magagnotti N (2010a) Productivity standards for harvesters and processors in Italy. For Prod J 60(3):226–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Magagnotti N, Nati C (2010b) Benchmarking the impact of traditional small-scale logging systems used in mediterranean forestry. For Ecol Manag 260:1997–2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Magagnotti N, Nati C (2011) Work quality and veneer value recovery of mechanized and manual log-making in Italian poplar plantations. Eur J For Res 130(5):737–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Lombardini C, Magagnotti N (2014) The effect of mechanization level and harvesting system on the thinning cost of Mediterranean softwood plantations. Silva Fenn 48(1):1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyn L (2017) Reserve bank announces surprise interest rate cut. Mail and Guardian. https://mg.co.za/article/2017-07-20-reserve-bank-announces-interest-rate-cut

  • Tsioras P, Liamas D (2015) Residual tree damage along skidding trails in beech stands in Greece. J For Res 26:523–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser R, Spinelli R (2012) Determining the shape of the productivity function for mechanized felling and felling-processing. J For Res 17:397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters I, Kembel S, Gingras JF, Shay J (2004) Short-term effects of cut-to-length versus full-tree harvesting on conifer regeneration in jack pine, mixedwood, and black spruce forests in Manitoba. Can J For Res 34:1938–1945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney R (1991) Quality of eastern white pine 10 years after damage by logging. For Chron 67:23–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by the (FP&M) SETA and Nelson Mandela University. Special thanks go to SAFCOL for providing land, equipment and manpower.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nelson Mandela University, George, South Africa

    Tigere Pasca Dembure, Andrew McEwan & Muedanyi Ramantswana

  2. CNR IVALSA, Via Madonna del Piano 10, Sesto Fiorentino, FI, Italy

    Raffaele Spinelli & Natascia Magagnotti

Authors
  1. Tigere Pasca Dembure
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew McEwan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raffaele Spinelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Natascia Magagnotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Muedanyi Ramantswana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tigere Pasca Dembure.

Additional information

Communicated by Eric R. Labelle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dembure, T.P., McEwan, A., Spinelli, R. et al. A comparison between two alternative harvesting systems in the thinning of fast-growing pine plantations under the conditions of low labour cost. Eur J Forest Res 138, 43–52 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-018-1152-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-018-1152-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation