Skip to main content
Log in

Design-unbiased point-to-object sampling on lines, with applications to areal sampling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sampling methods that depend on the distance between a sample point and a fixed number of objects, such as trees or downed logs, have often been proposed in the forestry and ecology literature. However, such methods have been biased when objects are not distributed with complete spatial randomness, have required difficult field procedures (such as measuring the position of out-of-sample objects), or both. Here a new approach based on measurement of the distance to objects along sample lines is proposed. The approach does not require measuring the position of out-of-sample objects, and its design-unbiased estimators require only simple arithmetic. Furthermore, because many useful sampling procedures can be related back to sampling on a line, the new method leads quickly to sampling procedures applicable when objects are distributed in a two-dimensional region. These include, among others, fixed-count approaches to line intersect sampling, a new approach to variable-area transect sampling, and a density-adapted variable sector sampling method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson DR, Pospahala RS (1970) Correction of bias in belt transect studies of immotile objects. J Wildl Manag 34:141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astrup R, Ducey MJ, Granhus A, von Lüpke N, Ritter T (2014) Approaches for estimating stand-level volume using terrestrial laser scanning in a single-scan mode. Can J For Res 44:666–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustin NH, Musio M, von Wilpert K, Kublin E, Wood SN, Schumacher M (2009) Modeling spatiotemporal forest health monitoring data. J Am Stat Assoc 104:899–911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker MG, Pinard MA (2001) Forest canopy research: sampling problems, and some solutions. Plant Ecol 153:23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabesi L (2001) A design-based approach to the estimation of plant density using point-to-plant sampling. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 6:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabesi L, Fattorini L (1998) The use of replicated plot, line, and point sampling for estimating species abundance and ecological diversity. Environ Ecol Stat 5:353–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabesi L, Marcheselli M (2002) Species abundance estimation using point-to-plant sampling in a design-based context. Environ Ecol Stat 9:393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batcheler CL (1971) Estimation of density from a sample of joint point and nearest-neighbor distances. Ecology 52:703–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batcheler CL, Craib DG (1985) A variable area plot method of assessment of forest condition and trend. N Z J Ecol 8:83–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäuerle H, Nothdurft A (2011) Spatial modeling of habitat trees based on line transect sampling and point pattern reconstruction. Can J For Res 41(4):715–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitterlich W (1948) Die Winkelzählprobe. Allg Forst Holzwirtsch Ztg 59:4–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitterlich W (1984) The relascope idea: relative measurements in forestry. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough (Buckinghamshire)

  • Bryant DM, Ducey MJ, Innes JC, Lee TD, Eckert RT, Zarin DJ (2004) Forest community analysis and the point-centered quarter method. Plant Ecol 175:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DR, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffon GLL Comte de (1777) Essai d’arithmétique morale, pp 67–180 in Oeuvres Complètes de Buffon, vol. 10, Histoire Naturelle, Générale et Particulière. de L‘Imprimerie Royale, Paris

  • Corona P, Fattorini L, Franceschi S (2011) Two-stage sector sampling for estimating small woodlot attributes. Can J For Res 41:1819–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia M, Diabaté M, Beavogui P, Guilavogui K, Lamanda N, de Foresta H (2010) Conserving forest tree diversity in Guinée Forestière (Guinea, West Africa): the role of coffee-based agroforests. Biodivers Conserv 19:1725–1747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottam G (1947) A point method for making rapid surveys of woodlands. Bull Ecol Soc Am 28(4):60

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottam G, Curtis JT (1949) A method for making rapid surveys of woodlands by means of pairs of randomly selected trees. Ecology 30:101–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottam G, Curtis JT (1956) The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37:451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delincé J (1986) Robust density estimation through distance measurements. Ecology 67:1576–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Montigny LE, Smith NJ (2017) The effects of gap size in a group selection silvicultural system on the growth response of young, planted Douglas-fir: a sector plot analysis. Forestry 90(3):426–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrowski SZ, Murphy SK (2006) A practical look at the variable area transect. Ecology 87:1856–1860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ducey MJ, Astrup R (2013) Adjusting for nondetection in forest inventories derived from terrestrial laser scanning. Can J Remote Sens 39:410–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison AM, Gotelli NJ, Hsiang N, Lavine M, Maidman AB (2014) Kernel intensity estimation of 2-dimensional spatial poisson point processes from k-tree sampling. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 19:357–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeman RM, Sugihara RT (1998) Optimization of variable area transect sampling using Monte Carlo simulation. Ecology 79:1425–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeman RM, Sugihara RT, Pank LF, Dusenberry WE (1994) A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation. Ecology 75:1769–1779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeman RM, Maedke BK, Beckerman SF (2002) Estimating deer losses in cabbage. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 49:205–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeman RM, Nielson RM, Sugihara RT (2005) Evaluation of optimized variable area transect sampling using totally enumerated field data sets. Environmetrics 16:767–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehrmann L, Gregoire TG, Kleinn C (2012) Triangulation based inclusion probabilities: a design-unbiased sampling approach. Environ Ecol Stat 19:107–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire TG (1998) Design-based and model-based inference in survey sampling: appreciating the difference. Can J For Res 28:1429–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire TG, Valentine HT (2008) Sampling strategies for natural resources and the environment. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire TG, Valentine HT, Furnival GM (1995) Sampling methods to estimate foliage and other characteristics of individual trees. Ecology 76:1181–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosenbaugh LR (1958) Point sampling and line sampling: probability theory, geometric implications, synthesis. Occ. paper 160, USDA Forest Service, Southern Exp. Sta

  • Hagemann U, Moroni MT, Gleißner J, Makeschin F (2010) Accumulation and preservation of dead wood upon burial by bryophytes. Ecosystems 13:600–611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haxtema Z, Temesgen H, Marquardt T (2012) Evaluation of n-tree distance sampling for inventory of headwater riparian forests of western Oregon. West J Appl For 27(3):109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz DG, Thompson DJ (1952) A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J Am Stat Assoc 47:663–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iles K (2009) Nearest-tree estimations: a discussion of their geometry. Math Comput For Nat Resour Sci 1:47–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Iles K, Smith NJ (2006) A new type of sample plot that is particularly useful for sampling small clusters of objects. For Sci 52:148–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessen RJ (1955) Determining the fruit count on a tree by randomized branch sampling. Biometrics 11:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson B, Holm S, Kallur H (1992) A forest inventory method based on density-adapted circular plot size. Scand J For Res 7:405–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser L (1983) Unbiased estimation in line-intercept sampling. Biometrics 34:965–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenning RS, Ducey MJ, Brissette JC, Gove JH (2005) Field efficiency and bias of snag inventory methods. Can J For Res 35:2900–2910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kint V, De Wulf R, Noël L (2004) Evaluation of sampling methods for the estimation of structural indices in forest stands. Ecol Model 180:461–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissa DO, Sheil D (2012) Visual detection based distance sampling offers efficient density estimation for distinctive low abundance tropical forest tree species in complex terrain. For Ecol Manag 263:114–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinn C, Vilčko F (2006a) Design-unbiased estimation for point to tree distance sampling. Can J For Res 36:1407–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinn C, Vilčko F (2006b) A new empirical approach for estimation in k-tree sampling. For Ecol Manag 237:522–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw JA Jr, Ducey MJ, Beers TW, Husch B (2016) Forest mensuration, 5th edn. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lessard V, Reed DD, Monkevich N (1994) Comparing n-tree distance sampling with point and plot sampling in northern Michigan forest types. North J Appl For 11:12–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch TB (2006) Variance reduction for sector sampling. For Sci 52:251–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch TB (2012) A mirage boundary correction method for distance sampling. Can J For Res 42(2):272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch TB, Rusydi R (1999) Distance sampling for forest inventory in Indonesian teak plantations. For Ecol Manag 113:215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnussen S (2012a) A new composite k-tree estimator of stem density. Eur J For Res 131:1513–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnussen S (2012b) Fixed-count density estimation with virtual plots. Spat Stat 2:33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnussen S (2014) Robust fixed-count density estimation with virtual plots. Can J For Res 44(4):377–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnussen S (2015) A fixed count sampling estimator of stem density based on a survival function. J For Sci 61(11):485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnussen S (2016) Improved fixed-count stand-level estimators of stem density, mean diameter, and basal area. Eur J For Res 135(1):191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnussen S, Kleinn C, Picard N (2008) Two new density estimators for distance sampling. Eur J For Res 127:213–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnussen S, Fehrmann L, Platt WJ (2012) An adaptive composite density estimator for k-tree sampling. Eur J For Res 131:307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkelä A, Sievänen R (1992) Height growth in open-grown trees. J Theor Biol 159:443–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkelä A, Valentine HT (2006) Crown ratio influences allometric scaling in trees. Ecology 87:2967–2972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mark AF, Esler AE (1970) An assessment of the point-centred quarter method of plotless sampling in some New Zealand forests. Proc N Z Ecol Soc 17:106–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt T, Temesgen H, Anderson PD (2010) Accuracy and suitability of selected sampling methods within conifer dominated riparian zones. For Ecol Manag 30:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moroni MT, Hagemann U, Beilman DW (2010) Dead wood is buried and preserved in a Labrador boreal forest. Ecosystems 13:452–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moroni MT, Morris DM, Shaw C, Stokland JN, Harmon ME, Fenton NJ, Merganičová K, Merganič J, Okabe K, Hagemann U (2015) Buried wood: a common yet poorly documented form of deadwood. Ecosystems 18(4):605–628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nath CD, Pélissier R, Garcia C (2010) Comparative efficiency and accuracy of variable area transects versus square plots for sampling tree diversity and density. Agrofor Syst 79:223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nothdurft A, Saborowski J, Nuske RS, Stoyan D (2010) Density estimation based on k-tree sampling and point pattern reconstruction. Can J For Res 40:953–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ord JK (1990) Statistical methods for point pattern data. In: Griffith D (ed) Spatial statistics: past, present, and future. Image, New York, pp 29–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton WS, Stehman SV (1996) The Horvitz Thompson theorem as a unifying perspective for probability sampling: with examples from natural resource sampling. Am Stat 49:261–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker KR (1979) Density estimation by variable area transect. J Wildl Manag 43:484–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard JH (1971) On distance estimators of density in randomly distributed forests. Biometrics 27:991–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risser PG, Zedler PH (1968) An evaluation of the grassland quarter method. Ecology 47:606–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter T, Saborowski J (2012) Point transect sampling of deadwood: a comparison with well-established sampling techniques for the estimation of volume and carbon storage in managed forests. Eur J For Res 131:1845–1856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter T, Saborowski J (2014) Efficient integration of a deadwood inventory into an existing forest inventory carried out as two-phase sampling for stratification. Forestry 87:571–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter T, Nothdurft A, Saborowski J (2013) Correcting the nondetection bias of angle count sampling. Can J For Res 43:344–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnell S, Kleinn C, Ståhl G (2015) Monitoring trees outside forests: a review. Environ Monit Assess 187(9):600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schreuder HT (2004) Sampling using a fixed number of trees per plot. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain, Research Station, research note RMRS-RN-17

  • Sheil D, Ducey MJ, Sidiyasa K, Samsoedin I (2003) A new type of sample unit for the efficient assessment of diverse tree communities in complex forest landscapes. J Trop For Sci 15:117–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheil D, Ducey MJ, Ssali F, Ngubwagye JM, van Heist M, Ezuma P (2012) Bamboo for people, mountain gorillas, and golden monkeys: evaluating harvest and conservation trade-offs and synergies in the Virunga Volcanoes. For Ecol Manag 267:163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith NJ, Iles K (2012) Sector sampling—synthesis and applications. Forests 3:114–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith NJ, Iles K, Raynor K (2008) Investigation of some sector sampling statistical properties. For Sci 54:67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Ståhl G, Ringvall A, Fridman J (2001) Assessment of coarse woody debris: a methodological overview. Ecol Bull 49:57–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinke I, Hennenberg KJ (2006) On the power of plotless density estimators for statistical comparisons of plant populations. Can J Bot 84:421–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokland JN, Woodall CW, Fridman J, Ståhl G (2016) Burial of downed deadwood is strongly affected by log attributes, forest ground vegetation, edaphic conditions, and climate zones. Can J For Res 46(12):1451–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strohbach M, Cole D (2007) Population dynamics and sustainable harvesting of the medicinal plant Harpagophytum procumbens in Namibia. BfN—Skripten 203. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn

  • Thompson SK (2012) Sampling, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Upton G, Fingleton B (1985) Spatial data analysis by example. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine HT, Mäkelä A (2005) Bridging process-based and empirical approaches to modeling tree growth. Tree Physiol 25:769–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine HT, Tritton LM, Furnival GM (1984) Subsampling trees for biomass, volume, or mineral content. For Sci 30:673–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine HT, Baldwin VC Jr, Gregoire TG, Burkhart HE (1994) Surrogates for foliar dry matter in loblolly pine. For Sci 40:576–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine HT, Gove JH, Gregoire TG (2001) Monte Carlo approaches to sampling forested tracts with lines or points. Can J For Res 31:1410–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wagner CE (1968) The line intersect method in forest fuel sampling. For Sci 14:20–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren WG, Olsen PF (1964) A line intersect technique for assesing logging waste. For Sci 10:267–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodall CW, Rondeux J, Verkerk PJ, Ståhl G (2009) Estimating dead wood during national forest inventories: a review of inventory methodologies and suggestions for harmonization. Environ Manag 44:624–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thomas B. Lynch and Timothy G. Gregoire provided valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. The Associate Editor and two anonymous reviewers gave helpful suggestions. Partial funding for this work was provided by the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station. This is Scientific Contribution Number 2773. This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture McIntire–Stennis Project 1007007.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark J. Ducey.

Additional information

Communicated by Arne Nothdurft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ducey, M.J. Design-unbiased point-to-object sampling on lines, with applications to areal sampling. Eur J Forest Res 137, 367–383 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-018-1109-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-018-1109-0

Keywords

Navigation