Skip to main content
Log in

A novel empirical approach for determining the extension of forest development stages in temperate old-growth forests

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the analysis of old-growth forest dynamics, the continuous process of tree aging and forest structural change is split up into several distinct forest development stages. The criteria for distinguishing the stages vary among the different approaches. In most of them, vertical canopy heterogeneity is only coarsely addressed and horizontal forest structure is quantified at spatial scales far exceeding the size of conventional forest inventory plots. In order to describe and analyze the complex mosaic structure of temperate old-growth forests with objective and quantitative measures in the context of forest inventories, we propose the Development Stage Index I DS . It employs two easily measured stand structural parameters (stem density and basal area) for quantifying the abundance of trees in three conventionally recognized tree diameter classes (premature  < 40 cm; mature 40–70 cm; and over-mature ≥ 70 cm) in plots of 500 m2 size, systematically distributed in the forest. This allows quantifying the spatial extension of the Initial, Optimum and Terminal stages of forest development at plot, stand and landscape levels. Based on thorough stand structural analyses in three virgin beech (Fagus sylvatica) forests in Slovakia, we demonstrate that I DS is a promising tool for (1) quantifying the proportion of the three stages on different scales, (2) visualizing the complex mixing of stages, and (3) analyzing dynamic changes in old-growth forest structure. We conclude that the Development Stage Index has the potential to improve the empirical foundation of forest dynamics research and to allow this discipline to proceed to more rigorous hypothesis testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessandrini A, Biondi F, Di Filippo A, Ziaco E, Piovesan G (2011) Tree size distribution at increasing spatial scales converges to the rotated sigmoid curve in two old-growth beech stands of the Italian Apennines. For Ecol Manag 262:1950–1962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assmann E (1961) Waldertragskunde. BLV Verlagsgesellschaft, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauhus J, Puettmann K, Messier C (2009) Silviculture for old-growth attributes. For Ecol Manag 258:525–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begehold H, Rzanny M, Flade M (2015) Forest development phases as an integrating tool to describe preferences of breeding birds in lowland beech forests. J Ornithol 156:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohn U, Neuhäusl R, Gollub R, Hettwer C, Neuhäuslova Z, Schlüter H, Weber H (2003) Karte der natürlichen Vegetation Europas. Teil 1: Erläuterungstext. Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottero A, Garbarino M, Dukić V, Govedar Z, Lingua E, Nagel TA, Motta R (2011) Gap-phase dynamics in the old-growth forest of Lom, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Silva Fenn 45(5):875–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen M, Emborg J, Nielsen AB (2007) The forest cycle of Suserup Skov—revisited and revised. Ecol Bull 52:33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Commarmot B, Bachofen H, Bundziak Y, Bürgi A, Ramp B, Shparyk Y, Sukhariuk D, Viter R, Zingg A (2005) Structures of virgin and managed beech forests in Uholka (Ukraine) and Sihlwald (Switzerland): a comparative study. For Snow Landsc Res 79:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Commarmot B, Brändli UB, Hamor F, Lavnyy V (2013) Inventory of the largest virgin beech forest of Europe. A Swiss-Ukrainian scientific adventure. Birmensdorf, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL; Lviv, Ukrainian National Forestry University, Rakhiv, Carpathian Biosphere Reserve

  • Drößler L, Lüpke B (2005) Canopy gaps in two virgin beech forest reserves in Slovakia. J For Sci 51:446–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drößler L, Meyer P (2006) Waldentwicklungsphasen in zwei Buchen-Urwaldreservaten in der Slowakei. Forstarchiv 77:155–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Drößler L, Feldmann E, Glatthorn J, Annighöfer P, Kucbel S, Tabaku V (2016) What happens after the gap?—Size distributions of patches with homogeneously sized trees in natural and managed beech forests in Europe. Open J For 6:177–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Emborg J, Christensen M, Heilmann-Clausen J (2000) The structural dynamics of Suserop Skov, a near natural temperate deciduous forest in Denmark. For Ecol Manag 126:173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JF, Spies TA, Van Pelt R, Carey AB, Thornburgh DA, Berg DR, Lindenmayer DB, Harmon ME, Keeton WS, Shaw DC, Bible K, Chen J (2002) Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. For Ecol Manag 155:399–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goff FG, West D (1975) Canopy-understory interaction effects on forest population structure. For Sci 21:98–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassi G, Minotta G, Giannini R, Bagnaresi U (2003) The structural dynamics of managed uneven-aged conifer stands in the Italian eastern Alps. For Ecol Manag 185:225–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobi ML, Ginzler C, Commarmot B, Bugmann H (2015) Gap pattern of the largest primeval beech forest of Europe revealed by remote-sensing. Ecosphere 6:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holeksa J, Saniga M, Szwagrzyk J, Czerniak M, Staszyńska K, Kapusta P (2009) A giant tree stand in the West Carpathians—an exception or a relic formerly widespread mountain European forests? For Ecol Manag 257:1577–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzwarth F, Kahl A, Bauhus J, Wirth C (2013) Many ways to die—partitioning tree mortality dynamics in a near-natural mixed deciduous forest. J Ecol 101:220–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter ML Jr (1990) Wildlife, forests and forestry: principles of managing forests for biological diversity. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski A, Podlaski R (2007) Structure and dynamics of selected stands of primeval character in the Pieniny National Park. Dendrobiology 58:25–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenderes K, Král K, Vrška T, Standovar T (2009) Natural gap dynamics in a Central European mixed beech-spruce-fir old-growth forest. Ecoscience 16(1):39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpel Š (1995) Die Urwälder der Westkarpaten. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Král K, Janík D, Vrška T, Adam D, Hort L, Unar P, Šamonil P (2010a) Local variability of stand structural features in beech dominated natural forests of Central Europe: implications for sampling. For Ecol Manag 260:2196–2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Král K, Vrška T, Hort L, Adam D, Šamonil P (2010b) Developmental phases in a temperate natural spruce-fir-beech forest: determination by a supervised classification method. Eur J For Res 129:339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Král K, Valtera M, Janík D, Šamonil P, Vrška T (2014) Spatial variability of general stand characteristics in central European beech-dominated natural stands—effects of scale. For Ecol Manag 328:353–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Král K, Shue J, Vrška T, Gonzalez-Akre EB, Parker GG, McShea WJ, McMahon SM (2016) Fine-scale patch mosaic of developmental stages in Northeast American secondary temperate forests: the European perspective. Eur J For Res 135:981–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucbel S, Jaloviar P, Saniga M, Vencurik J, Klimaš V (2010) Canopy gaps in an old-growth fir-beech forest remnant of Western Carpathians. Eur J For Res 129:249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucbel S, Saniga M, Jaloviar P, Vencurik J (2012) Stand structure and temporal variability in old-growth beech-dominated forests of the northwestern Carpathians: a 40-years perspective. For Ecol Manag 264:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibundgut H (1982) Europäische Urwälder der Bergstufe. Paul Haupt, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibundgut H (1993) Europäische Urwälder—Wegweiser zur naturnahen Waldwirtschaft. Paul Haupt, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi F, Cherubini P, Lasserre B, Tognetti R, Marchetti M (2008) Tree rings used to assess time since death of deadwood of different decay classes in beech and silver fir forests in central Apennines (Molise, Italy). Can J For Res 38:821–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi F, Marchetti M, Corona P, Merlini P, Chirici G, Tognetti R, Burrascano S, Alivernini A, Puletti N (2015) Quantifying the effect of sampling plot size on the estimation of structural indicators in old-growth forest stands. For Ecol Manag 346:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer P (1999) Bestimmung der Waldentwicklungsphasen und der Texturdiversität in Naturwäldern. Allg Forst-u J-Ztg 170:203–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer P, Ackermann J, Balcar P, Boddenberg J, Detsch R, Förster B, Fuchs H, Hoffmann B, Keitel W, Kölbel M, Köthke C, Koss H, Unkrig J, Weber J, Willig J (2001) Untersuchungen der Waldstruktur und ihrer Dynamik in Naturwaldreservaten. Arbeitskreis Naturwälder. Bund-Länder-Arbeitsgemeinschaft Forsteinrichtung. IHW-Verlag, Eching

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller KM (1929) Aufbau, Wuchs und Verjüngung der südosteuropäischen Urwälder. Schaper, Hannover

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller J, Bütler R (2010) A review of habitat thresholds for dead wood: a baseline for management recommendations in European forests. Eur J For Res 129:981–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Using S, Bartsch N (2009) Decay dynamic of coarse and fine woody debris of (Fagus sylvatica L.) forest in Central Germany. Eur J For Res 128:287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel TA, Svoboda M (2008) Gap disturbance regime in an old-growth Fagus–Abies forest in the Dinaric Mountains, Bosnia-Herzegovina. Can J For Res 38:2728–2737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel TA, Svoboda M, Kobal M (2014) Disturbance, life history traits, and dynamics in an old-growth forest landscape of southeastern Europe. Ecol Appl 24(4):663–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann M (1979) Bestandesstruktur und Entwicklungsdynamik im Urwald Rothwald/NÖ und im Urwald Čorkova Uvala/Kroatien. PhD thesis, Univ. f. Bodenkultur, Wien

  • Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996) Forest stand dynamics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Paluch JG (2007) The spatial pattern of a natural European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)—silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) forest: a patch mosaic perspective. For Ecol Manag 253:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck JE, Commarmot B, Hobi ML, Zenner EK (2015) Should reference conditions be drawn from a single 10 ha plot? Assessing representativeness in a 10,000 ha old-growth European beech forest. Restor Ecol 23:927–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterken GF (1996) Natural woodland ecology and conservation in northern temperate regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters R (1997) Beech forests. Geobotany 24. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petráš R, Pajtík J (1991) Sústava Česko-slovenských objemových tabuliek drevín. Lesnícky Časopis 37:49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretzsch H (2009) Forest dynamics, growth and yield. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Přívětivý T, Janík D, Unar P, Adam D, Král K, Vrška T (2016) How do environmental conditions affect the deadwood decomposition of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)? For Ecol Manag 381:177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remmert H (1991) The mosaic-cycle concept of ecosystems—an overview. In: Remmert H (ed) The mosaic-cycle concept of ecosystems. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Röhrig E, Bartsch N, Lüpke B (2006) Waldbau auf ökologischer Grundlage. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuck A, Meyer P, Menke N, Lier M, Lindner M (2004) Forest biodiversity indicator: deadwood—a proposed approach towards operationalising the MCPFE indicator. In: Marchetti M (ed) Monitoring and indicators of forest biodiversity in Europe—from ideas to operationality. European Forest Institute, EFI PROC. 51, pp 49–77

  • Spies TA, Franklin JF (1996) The diversity and maintenance of old-growth forests. In: Szaro RC, Johnson DW (eds) Biodiversity in managed landscapes: theory and practice. Oxford Universisty Press, New York, pp 296–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabaku V (2000) Struktur von Buchen-Urwäldern in Albanien im Vergleich mit deutschen Buchen-Naturwaldreservaten und-Wirtschaftswäldern. PhD thesis, Cuvillier Verlag, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabaku V, Meyer P (1999) Lückenmuster albanischer und mitteleuropäischer Buchenwälder unterschiedlicher Nutzungsintensität. Forstarchiv 70:87–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotsiuk V, Hobi ML, Commarmot B (2012) Age structure and disturbance dynamics of the relic virgin beech forest Uholka (Ukrainian Carpathians). For Ecol Manag 265:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt AS (1947) Pattern and process in the plant community. J Ecol 35:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal C, Tremer N, Oheimb G, Hansen J, Gadow K, Härdtle W (2006) Is the reverse J-shaped diameter distribution universally applicable in European virgin beech forests? For Ecol Manag 223:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter S, Brambach F (2011) Determination of a common forest life cycle assessment method for biodiversity evaluation. For Ecol Manag 262:2120–2132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeibig A, Diaci J, Wagner S (2005) Gap disturbance patterns of a Fagus sylvatica virgin forest remnant in the mountain vegetation belt of Slovenia. For Snow Landsc Res 79:69–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenner EK, Peck JE, Hobi ML, Commarmot B (2014) The dynamics of structure across scale in a primaeval European beech stand. Forestry 88:180–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenner EK, Peck JE, Hobi ML, Commarmot B (2016) Validation of a classification protocol: meeting the prospect requirement and ensuring distinctiveness when assigning forest development phases. Appl Veg Sci 19:541–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support by the Stemmler Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. We are also grateful to the Poloniny National Park authority, the local forest administrations and the Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic for the permits to conduct the study and for technical support during the fieldwork. For organizational and technical support we also like to thank Viliam Pichler and his working group at the Technical University of Zvolen. Many thanks for assistance in the field to Matthias Steckel. We thank two anonymous reviewers for highly useful comments and suggestions on the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Stemmler Foundation, a member of the Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft, Essen, Germany (Grant Number T206/23493/2012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eike Feldmann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Claus Bässler.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 64 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feldmann, E., Glatthorn, J., Hauck, M. et al. A novel empirical approach for determining the extension of forest development stages in temperate old-growth forests. Eur J Forest Res 137, 321–335 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-018-1105-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-018-1105-4

Keywords

Navigation