Running in fear: an investigation into the dimensional account of emotion in discriminating emotional expressions
- 2 Downloads
Emotion can be conceptualized by the dimensional account of emotion with the dimensions of valence and arousal. There is little discussion of the difference in discriminability across the dimensions. The present study hypothesized that any pair of emotional expressions differing in the polarity of both valence and arousal dimensions would be easier to distinguish than a pair differing in only one dimension. The results indicate that the difference in the dimensions did not affect participants’ reaction time. Most pairs of emotional expressions, except those involving fear, were similarly discriminative. Reaction times to pairs with a fearful expression were faster than to those without. The fast reaction time to fearful facial expressions underscores the survival value of emotions.
KeywordsDimension Discrete Emotion
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Human Research Ethics Committee in Hong Kong Shue Yan University and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with non-human animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Becker DV, Anderson US, Mortensen CR, Neufeld SL, Neel R (2011) The face in the crowd effect unconfounded: happy faces, not angry faces, are more efficiently detected in single- and multiple-target visual search tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen 140(4):637–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024060 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cacioppo JT, Berntson GG, Norris CJ, Gollan JK (2011) The evaluative space model. In: van Lange P, Kruglanski A, Higgins ET (eds) Handbook of theories of social psychology. SAGE Publications, CAGoogle Scholar
- D’Andrade RG (1984) Culture meaning systems. In: Shweder RA, Levine RA (eds) Culture theory: essays on mind, self, and emotion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 88–119Google Scholar
- Damasio A (2003) Looking for Spinoza. Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. First Harvest, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Fodor J (1983) The modularity of mind. MIT Press, USAGoogle Scholar
- Hill E, Han D, Dumouchel P, Dehak N, Quatieri T, Moehs C, Oscar-Berman M, Giordano J, Simpatico T, Blum K (2013) Long term suboxone (TM) emotional reactivity as measured by automatic detection in speech. PLoS ONE 8:e69043. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069043 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Lee, LP, Li WO, Lo LY, Yeung PS (2016) Sadly disgust or disgustedly sad: a study on the distinctiveness of basic emotions with a new Asian emotional expression photobank. Paper presented at the 31st international congress of psychology, Yokohama, JapanGoogle Scholar
- Schienle A, Stark R, Walter B, Blecker C, Ott U, Kirsch P, Sammer G, Vaitl D (2002) The insula is not specifically involved in disgust processing: an fMRI study. Euroreport 13:2023–2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Silk JB, Beehner JC, Bergman TJ, Crockford C, Engh AL, Moscovice LR, Wittig RM, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2009) The benefits of social capital: close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival. Proc R Soc B 276:3099–3104. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0681 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Trnka R, Tavel P, Hasto J (2015) Facial expression of fear in the context of human ethology: recognition advantage in the perception of male faces. Neuroendocrinology 36(2):106–111Google Scholar
- White G (2000) Representing emotional meaning: category, metaphor, schema, discourse. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM (eds) Handbook of emotions. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 30–44Google Scholar