Abstract
Recent evidence has shown that the mental representation of time is “embodied”—time is expressed via the hands, the eyes, and the whole body. These findings suggest the existence of a manually reflected mental time line running (in Western culture) horizontally from left (past) to right (future) and an ocularly reflected mental time line running from left/down (past) to right/up (future). We addressed the question whether mental time is also reflected interpersonally and investigated whether an avatar’s face orientation (left vs. right) would facilitate a subject’s temporal processing in relation to the horizontal mental time line. In combination with a left- or right-gazing avatar, we presented a temporal auditory word (“gestern”—yesterday or “morgen”—tomorrow), and our subjects had to manually categorize the word as being either past- or future-related (classic left/right key-press paradigm). The stimulus–response (SR) mapping was either compatible (past word—left hand, future word—right hand) or incompatible (future word—left hand, past word—right hand). Responses were significantly faster in blocks with compatible versus incompatible mapping. Thus, our results provide clear evidence for manually reflected mental time running from left to right, even for temporal auditory words that are free of potential visual (reading direction) confounds. The presented interpersonal cues (avatar head orientation) facilitated the activation of the horizontal mental time line in blocks with incompatible SR-mapping but not in blocks with compatible (standard) mapping. We conclude that interpersonal cues exert weak effects on the spatial representation of mental time and can help to adapt context-specific mappings of temporal concepts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bonato M, Zorzi M, Umilta C (2012) When time is space: evidence for a mental time line. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36:2257–2273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.08.007
Brugger P (2002) Reflective mirrors: perspective-taking in autoscopic phenomena. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 7:179–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546800244000076
Casasanto D, Bottini R (2014) Mirror reading can reverse the flow of time. J Exp Psychol Gen 143:473–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033297
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
de la Vega I, Eikmeier V, Ulrich R, Kaup B (2017) The mental timeline in a crossed-hands paradigm. Exp Psychol 63:326–332
Eikmeier V, Alex-Ruf S, Maienborn C, Ulrich R (2015a) How strongly linked are mental time and space along the left-right axis? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 41:1878–1883. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000129
Eikmeier V, Hoppe D, Ulrich R (2015b) Response mode does not modulate the space-time congruency effect: evidence for a space-time mapping at a conceptual level. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 156:162–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.10.008
Grade S, Lefèvre N, Pesenti M (2013) Influence of gaze observation on random number generation. Exp Psychol 60:122–130. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000178
Hartmann M, Martarelli CS, Mast FW, Stocker K (2014) Eye movements during mental time travel follow a diagonal line. Conscious Cogn 30:201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.09.007
Hochberg Y (1988) A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75:800–802
Hommel B (2011) The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 136:189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.011
Ishihara M, Keller PE, Rossetti Y, Prinz W (2008) Horizontal spatial representations of time: evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex 44:454–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.010
Kong F, You X (2011) Space–time compatibility effects in the auditory modality. Exp Psychol 59:82–87. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000129
Martarelli CS, Mast FW, Hartmann M (2017) Time in the eye of the beholder: gaze position reveals spatial-temporal associations during encoding and memory retrieval of future and past. Memory Cogn 45:40–48
Miles LK, Nind LK, Macrae CN (2010) Moving through time. Psychol Sci 21:222–223
Nava E, Rinaldi L, Bulf H, Macchi Cassia V (2017) Visual and proprioceptive feedback differently modulate the spatial representation of number and time in children. J Exp Child Psychol 161:161–177
Ouellet M, Santiago J, Funes MJ, Lupianez J (2010a) Thinking about the future moves attention to the right. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 36:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017176
Ouellet M, Santiago J, Israeli Z, Gabay S (2010b) Is the future the right time? Exp Psychol 57:308–314
Ouellet M, Román A, Santiago J (2012) A multisensory interaction effect in the conceptual realm of time. Exp Psychol 59:236–242
Rinaldi L, Brugger P, Bockisch CJ, Bertolini G, Girelli L (2015) Keeping an eye on serial order: ocular movements bind space and time. Cognition 142:291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.022
Rinaldi L, Locati F, Parolin L, Bernardi NF, Girelli L (2016) Walking on a mental time line: temporal processing affects step movements along the sagittal space. Cortex 78:170–173
Rolke B et al (2013) Priming the mental time-line: effects of modality and processing mode. Cogn Process 14:231–244
Santiago J, Lupianez J, Perez E, Funes MJ (2007) Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychon Bull Rev 14:512–516. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194099
Simon JR, Rudell AP (1967) Auditory SR compatibility—effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J Appl Psychol 51:300–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020586
Stins JF, Habets L, Jongeling W, Cañal-Bruland R (2016) Being (un)moved by mental time travel. Conscious Cogn 42:374–381
Stocker K, Hartmann M, Martarelli CS, Mast FW (2016) Eye movements reveal mental looking through time. Cogn Sci 40:1648–1670. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12301
Torralbo A, Santiago J, Lupiáñez J (2006) Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cogn Sci 30:745–757
Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. AddisonWesley, Reading
Tversky B, Martin HB (2009) Embodied and disembodied cognition: spatial perspective-taking. Cognition 110:124–129
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank Agnes Münch for programming and technical assistance, and Larissa Reis and Emanuel Naß for help with the data collection. We also thank Andrea Bizzeti (Phonogram Archive of the University of Zürich) for recording the audio word stimuli.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Note that an earlier version of this manuscript is part of a doctoral thesis by the first author. The thesis is accessible via the following link: https://publications.ub.uni-mainz.de/theses/volltexte/2017/100001532/pdf/100001532.pdf.
Human and animal rights statement
All procedures performed in our study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee—Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Institute of Psychology at the Johannes Gutenberg-Universität—and with the 1964 Declaration Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Prior to the study, the IRB had informed us that in accordance with the department’s ethics guidelines no explicit ethics vote of the IRB was necessary for our study, because we tested only healthy adult volunteers, only harmless visual stimuli were presented, the experiment did not cause physical or psychological stress, no physiological parameters were measured, no sensitive data like personality or clinical scales were collected, and no misleading or wrong information was given to the participants.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Handling editor: Juan Lupianez (University of Granada); Reviewers: Marc Ouellet (University of Granada), Pom Charras (University Paul Valery Montpellier), Luca Rinaldi (University of Milano-Bicocca).
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thönes, S., Stocker, K., Brugger, P. et al. Is mental time embodied interpersonally?. Cogn Process 19, 419–427 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0857-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0857-6