Cognitive Processing

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 41–45 | Cite as

Attenuated audiovisual integration in middle-aged adults in a discrimination task

Research Report

Abstract

Numerous studies have focused on the diversity of audiovisual integration between younger and older adults. However, consecutive trends in audiovisual integration throughout life are still unclear. In the present study, to clarify audiovisual integration characteristics in middle-aged adults, we instructed younger and middle-aged adults to conduct an auditory/visual stimuli discrimination experiment. Randomized streams of unimodal auditory (A), unimodal visual (V) or audiovisual stimuli were presented on the left or right hemispace of the central fixation point, and subjects were instructed to respond to the target stimuli rapidly and accurately. Our results demonstrated that the responses of middle-aged adults to all unimodal and bimodal stimuli were significantly slower than those of younger adults (p < 0.05). Audiovisual integration was markedly delayed (onset time 360 ms) and weaker (peak 3.97%) in middle-aged adults than in younger adults (onset time 260 ms, peak 11.86%). The results suggested that audiovisual integration was attenuated in middle-aged adults and further confirmed age-related decline in information processing.

Keywords

Multisensory Audiovisual integration Middle-aged adults Race modal 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the individuals who participated in our study. This study was supported by Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (16YJC190025).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Alain C, Woods DL (1999) Age-related changes in processing auditory stimuli during visual attention: evidence for deficits in inhibitory control and sensory memory. Psychol Aging 14:507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cid-Fernández S, Lindín M, Díaz F (2016) Information processing becomes slower and predominantly serial in aging: characterization of response-related brain potentials in an auditory–visual distraction–attention task. Biol Psychol 113:12–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Correa-Jaraba KS, Cid-Fernández S, Lindín M, Díaz F (2016) Involuntary capture and voluntary reorienting of attention decline in middle-aged and old participants. Front Hum Neurosci 10:1–13. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Boer-Schellekens L, Vroomen J (2014) Multisensory integration compensates loss of sensitivity of visual temporal order in the elderly. Exp Brain Res 232:253–262. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3736-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. DeLoss DJ, Pierce RS, Andersen GJ (2013) Multisensory integration, aging, and the sound-induced flash illusion. Psychol Aging 28:802–812. doi: 10.1037/a0033289 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Diaconescu AO, Hasher L, McIntosh AR (2013) Visual dominance and multisensory integration changes with age. Neuroimage 65:152–166. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.057 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Diederich A, Colonius H, Schomburg A (2008) Assessing age-related multisensory enhancement with the time-window-of-integration model. Neuropsychologia 46:2556–2562. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Freiherr J, Lundström JN, Habel U, Reetz K (2013) Multisensory integration mechanisms during aging. Front Hum Neurosci 7:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Giard MH, Peronnet F (1999) Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. J Cogn Neurosci 11:473–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kolev V, Falkenstein M, Yordanova J (2006) Motor-response generation as a source of aging-related behavioural slowing in choice-reaction tasks. Neurobiol Aging 27:1719–1730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Laurienti PJ, Burdette JH, Maldjian JA, Wallace MT (2006) Enhanced multisensory integration in older adults. Neurobiol Aging 27:1155–1163. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.05.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Li Q, Wu J, Touge T (2010) Audiovisual interaction enhances auditory detection in late stage: an event-related potential study. Neuroreport 21:173–178. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283345f08 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mager R, Falkenstein M, Stormer R, Brand S, Muller-Spahn F, Bullinger AH (2005) Auditory distraction in young and middle-aged adults: a behavioural and event-related potential study. J Neural Transm 112:1165–1176. doi: 10.1007/s00702-004-0258-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mahoney JR, Li PC, Oh-Park M, Verghese J, Holtzer R (2011) Multisensory integration across the senses in young and old adults. Brain Res 1426:43–53. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.09.017 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller J (1982) Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cogn Psychol 14:247–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller J (1986) Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention. Percept Psychophys 40:331–343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Monge ZA, Madden DJ (2016) Linking cognitive and visual perceptual decline in healthy aging: the information degradation hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 69:166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.031 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Peiffer AM, Mozolic JL, Hugenschmidt CE, Laurienti PJ (2007) Age-related multisensory enhancement in a simple audiovisual detection task. Neuroreport 18:1077–1081. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3281e72ae7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Stephen JM, Knoefel JE, Adair J, Hart B, Aine CJ (2010) Aging-related changes in auditory and visual integration measured with MEG. Neurosci Lett 484:76–80. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.08.023 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Talsma D, Woldorff MG (2005) Selective attention and multisensory integration: multiple phases of effects on the evoked brain activity. J Cogn Neurosci 17:1098–1114. doi: 10.1162/0898929054475172 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Teder-Sälejärvi W, Russo FD, McDonald JJ, Hillyard S (2005) Effects of spatial congruity on audio-visual multimodal integration. J Cogn Neurosci 17:1396–1409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wu J, Yang W, Gao Y, Kimura T (2012) Age-related multisensory integration elicited by peripherally presented audiovisual stimuli. Neuroreport 23:616–620. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283552b0f CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang W, Chu B, Yang J, Yu Y, Wu J, Yu S (2014) Elevated audiovisual temporal interaction in patients with migraine without aura. J Headache Pain 15:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yang W, Yang J, Gao Y, Tang X, Ren Y, Takahashi S, Wu J (2015) Effects of sound frequency on audiovisual integration: an event-related potential study. PLoS ONE 10:e0138296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138296 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Faculty of EducationHubei UniversityWuhan CityChina
  2. 2.Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Medical Humanities CollegeGuiyang University of Traditional Chinese MedicineGuiyangChina
  3. 3.Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Graduate School of Natural Science and TechnologyOkayama UniversityOkayamaJapan

Personalised recommendations