Cognitive Processing

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 17–25 | Cite as

Lateralized pointing does not cause a cognitive bias

  • Ineke J. M. van der Ham
  • Jantina Brummelman
  • Marie Elise Aerts
  • Alyanne M. de Haan
  • H. Chris Dijkerman
Research Report

Abstract

Lateralized pointing has been shown to cause not only a shift in visuo-motor midline, but also a shift in non-lateralized spatial attention. Non-lateralized cognitive consequences of lateralized pointing have been reported for local and global visuospatial processing. Here, we evaluate these findings and examine this effect for categorical and coordinate spatial relation processing, for which the attentional processes are thought to be highly similar to local and global visuospatial processing, respectively. Participants performed a commonly used working memory task to assess categorical and coordinate spatial relation processing. Lateralized pointing with either the left or the right hand, to either the left or the right side was introduced as a manipulation, as well as a new control condition without any pointing. Performance on the spatial relation task was measured before and after pointing. The results suggest that non-lateralized consequences of lateralized pointing cannot be generalized to other cognitive tasks relying on attentional processing. Further examination of lateralized pointing is recommended before drawing further conclusions concerning its impact on non-lateralized cognition.

Keywords

Lateralized pointing Attention Spatial relations Visuospatial perception 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Daniëlle Juffermans for her help in collecting the data. CD was supported by a VICI grant by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO, Grant No. 453.10.003). IH was supported by a VENI grant by NWO (Grant No. 451.12.004).

References

  1. Berberovic N, Mattingley JB (2003) Effects of prismatic adaptation on judgements of spatial extent in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Neuropsychologia 41:493–503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Borst G, Kosslyn SM (2010) Varying the scope of attention alters the encod-ing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations. Neuropsychologia 48(9):2769–2772CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bultitude JH, Woods JM (2010) Adaptation to leftward-shifting prisms reduces the global processing bias of healthy individuals. Neuropsychologia 48:1750–1756CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Colent C, Pisella L, Bernieri C, Rode G, Rossetti Y (2000) Cognitive bias induced by visuo-motor adaptation to prisms: a simulation of unilateral neglect in normal individuals?. Neuroreport 11:1899–1902CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dupierrix E, Alleysson D, Ohlmann T, Chokron S (2008) Spatial bias induced by a non-conflictual task reveals the nature of space perception. Brain Res 1214:127–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Franciotti R, D’Ascenzo S, Di Domenico A, Tommasi L, Laeng B (2013) Focusing narrowly or broadly attention when judging categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a MEG study. PLoS ONE 8(12):e83434CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Franconeri SL, Scimeca JM, Roth JC, Helseth SA, Kahn LE (2012) Flexible visualprocessing of spatial relationships. Cognition 122:210–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Herlihey TA, Black SE, Ferber S (2013) Action modulated cognition: the influence of sensori-motor experience on the global processing bias. Neuropsychologia 51:1973–1979CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. JASP Team (2017) JASP (version 0.8.1.2) [computer software]Google Scholar
  10. Kosslyn SM (1987) Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: a computational analysis. Psychol Rev 94:148–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Laeng B, Okubo M, Saneyoshi A, Michimata C (2011) Processing spatial relationswith different apertures of attention. Cogn Sci 35(2):297–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Michel C, Pisella L, Halligan PW, Luauté J, Rode G, Boisson D, Rossetti Y (2003) Simulating unilateral neglect in normals using prism adaptation: implications for theory. Neuropsychologia 41:25–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Michimata C, Saneyoshi A, Okubo M, Laeng B (2011) Effects of the global andlocal attention on the processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations. Brain Cogn 77(2):292–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Morey RD, Rouder JN (2015) BayesFactor (version 0.9.11-3) [computer software]Google Scholar
  15. Nijboer T, Vree A, Dijkerman C, van der Stigchel S (2010) Prism adaptation influences perception but not attention: evidence from antisaccades. Neuroreport 21:386–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Okubo M, Laeng B, Saneyoshi A, Michimata C (2010) Exogenous attention differ-entially modulates the processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 135(1):1–11Google Scholar
  17. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rosetti Y, Rode G, Pisella L, Farné A, Li L, Boisson D, Perenin M-T (1998) Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature 395:166–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rouder JN, Morey RD, Speckman PL, Province JM (2012) Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. J Math Psychol 56:356–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Striemer C, Sablatnig J, Danckert J (2006) Differential influences of prism adaptation on reflexive and voluntary covert attention. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 12:337–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Van der Ham IJM, Raemaekers M, van Wezel RJA, Oleksiak A, Postma A (2009) Categorical and coordinate spatial relations in working memory: an fMRI study. Brain Res 1297:70–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Van der Ham IJM, Dijkerman HC, van den Berg E (2012a) The effect of attentionalscope on spatial relation processing: a case study. Neurocase 19(5):505–512PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Van der Ham IJM, Duijndam MJA, Raemaekers M, van Wezel RJA, Oleksiak A, Postma A (2012b) Retinotopic mapping of categorical and coordinate spatialrelation processing. PLoS ONE 7(6):e38644CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Van der Ham IJM, Postma A, Laeng B (2014) Lateralized perception: the role of attention in spatial relation processing. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 45:142–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ineke J. M. van der Ham
    • 1
  • Jantina Brummelman
    • 2
  • Marie Elise Aerts
    • 2
  • Alyanne M. de Haan
    • 2
  • H. Chris Dijkerman
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Health, Medical, and NeuropsychologyLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Experimental PsychologyHelmholtz Institute Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations