Interinstrumental Transfer of a Chiral Capillary Electrophoretic Method: The Use of Robustness Test Information to Overcome Differences in Detector and Data-Handling Specifications
Capillary electrophoresis has been widely used as chiral separation technique, applying chiral selectors that are added to the background electrolyte. The advantages of capillary electrophoresis as separation technique are its flexibility, low cost, and high separation efficiency. This study is part of a research project, where guidelines are defined to facilitate interinstrumental method transfer of capillary electrophoretic methods, which is one of the major drawbacks of capillary electrophoresis. Another drawback is the lower sensitivity compared to liquid chromatographic methods. Improving and maintaining the sensitivity are the reason why focus should be put on the interinstrumental differences between detector settings. The aim of this study was to determine when adaption of the detector settings during interinstrumental method transfer was needed. The chiral separations of two betablockers were selected as case studies. The influence of detector parameters, such as data acquisition rate, bandwidth, and filter, on sensitivity responses, such as peak area, height, and width, was evaluated by means of robustness tests performed on two capillary electrophoresis instruments. The statistically significant parameters were identified and non-significance intervals determined. To maintain or optimise the obtained sensitivity, the information gathered from the robustness test was further incorporated in guidelines developed to facilitate interinstrumental analytical method transfer of capillary electrophoretic methods.
KeywordsCapillary electrophoresis Interinstrumental transfer Detector settings Data-handling specifications Robustness test
Compliance with Ethical Standards
No funding was granted for this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Human/animal rights statement
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 2.Mangelings D, Vander Heyden Y (2011) Chiral separation methods for pharmaceutical and biotechnology products. In: Ahuja S (ed) lxChiral separation methods for pharmaceutical and biotechnological products, chapter 11. Wiley, New York, pp 331–350Google Scholar
- 4.http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm122883.htm. Accessed 10 Aug 2017
- 5.Directive 75/318/EEC: investigation of chiral active substances, http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500002816.pdf. Accessed 23 Aug 2017
- 6.International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, ICH Harmonised Tripartite guideline, specifications: test procedures and acceptance criteria for new drug substances and new drug products: chemical substances, Q6A. http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q6A/Step4/Q6Astep4.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2017
- 7.Gübitz G, Schmid MG (2004) Chiral recognition in separation science: an overview. In: Gübitz G, Schmid MG (eds) Methods in molecular biology; chiral separation methods and protocols, chapter 1. Humana Press, New Jersey, pp 1–29Google Scholar
- 8.Chankvetadze B (1997) Basics of capillary electrophoresis. In: Chankvetadze B (ed) Capillary electrophoresis in chiral analysis, chapter 1. Wiley, New York, pp 5–40Google Scholar
- 13.Chen Y, Lü W, Chen X, Teng M (2012) Cent Eur J Chem 10:611–638Google Scholar
- 18.Sekhon BS (2011) J Pharm Educ Res 2:2–36Google Scholar
- 19.Gübitz G, Schmid MG (2014) Electrophoresis 23:3981–3996Google Scholar
- 22.CE expert tool, Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, USA. https://www.beckmancoulter.com/wsrportal/wsr/research-and-discovery/products-and-services/capillary-electrophoresis/ce-expert-lite/index.htm. Accessed 10 Aug 2017
- 24.Montgomery DC (2013) Three-level and mixed-level factorial and fractional factorial designs. In: Montgomery DC (ed) Design and analysis of experiments by Douglas montgomery a supplement for using JMP, chapter 9. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA, pp 173–188Google Scholar
- 27.Dong F (1993) Stat Sin 3:209–217Google Scholar
- 30.P/ACE™ MDQ User’s Guide 32 Karat™ 8.0 (2009) Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, chapter 5, pp 41–47Google Scholar
- 31.https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/Support/Documents/a10424.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2017