Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of a novel 8-channel RX coil for speech production MRI at 0.55 T

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Speech production MRI benefits from lower magnetic fields due to reduced off-resonance effects at air-tissue interfaces and from the use of dedicated receiver coils due to higher SNR and parallel imaging capability. Here we present a custom designed upper airway coil for 1H imaging at 0.55 Tesla and evaluate its performance in comparison with a vendor-provided prototype 16-channel head/neck coil.

Materials and methods

Four adult volunteers were scanned with both custom speech and prototype head–neck coils. We evaluated SNR gains of each of the coils over eleven upper airway volumes-of-interest measured relative to the integrated body coil. We evaluated parallel imaging performance of both coils by computing g-factors for SENSE reconstruction of uniform and variable density Cartesian sampling schemes with R = 2, 3, and 4.

Results

The dedicated coil shows approximately 3.5-fold SNR efficiency compared to the head–neck coil. For R = 2 and 3, both uniform and variable density samplings have g-factor values below 1.1 in the upper airway region. For R = 4, g-factor values are higher for both trajectories.

Discussion

The dedicated coil configuration allows for a significant SNR gain over the head–neck coil in the articulators. This, along with favorable g values, makes the coil useful in speech production MRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

Data and code from this work are available at: Code: github.com/usc-mrel/speech_coil_eval, Data: zenodo.org/record/5898595.

References

  1. Bresch E, Yoon-Chul K, Nayak K et al (2008) Seeing speech: capturing vocal tract shaping using real-time magnetic resonance imaging [Exploratory DSP]. IEEE Signal Process Magn 25:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2008.918034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Scott AD, Wylezinska M, Birch MJ, Miquel ME (2014) Speech MRI: Morphology and function. Physica Med 30:604–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pauloski BR, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW et al (1993) Speech and swallowing function after anterior tongue and floor of mouth resection with distal flap reconstruction. J Speech Lang Hear Res 36:267–276. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3602.267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wyatt R, Sell D, Russell J et al (1996) Cleft palate speech dissected: a review of current knowledge and analysis. Br J Plast Surg 49:143–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(96)90216-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cao B, Sebkhi N, Mau T et al (2019) Permanent Magnetic Articulograph (PMA) vs Electromagnetic Articulograph (EMA) in Articulation-to-Speech Synthesis for Silent Speech Interface. In: Proceedings of the eighth workshop on speech and language processing for assistive technologies. Association for computational linguistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, pp 17–23

  6. Rebernik T, Jacobi J, Jonkers R et al (2021) A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography. Lab Phonol: J Assoc Lab Phonol 12:6. https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Preston JL, Leece MC, Maas E (2016) Intensive treatment with ultrasound visual feedback for speech sound errors in childhood Apraxia. Front Hum Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00440

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Veis S, Logemann JA, Colangelo L (2000) Effects of three techniques on maximum posterior movement of the tongue base. Dysphagia 15:142–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004550010016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayes A, Alspaugh JM, Bartelt D et al (2009) Radiation safety for the speech-language pathologist. Dysphagia 24:274–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-008-9201-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schenck JF (1996) The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 23:815–850. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lim Y, Lingala SG, Narayanan SS, Nayak KS (2019) Dynamic off-resonance correction for spiral real-time MRI of speech. Magn Reson Med 81:234–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lim Y, Bliesener Y, Narayanan S, Nayak KS (2020) Deblurring for spiral real-time MRI using convolutional neural networks. Magn Reson Med 84:3438–3452. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28393

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lim Y, Nayak KS (2022) Real-time MRI of speech production at 0.55 Tesla. In: ISMRM 31st Scientific Session. London, England, United Kingdom

  14. Bhattacharya I, Ramasawmy R, Restivo MC, Campbell-Washburn AE (2019) Dynamic speech imaging at 0.55T using single shot spirals for 11ms temporal resolution. In: ISMRM 27th Scientific Session. Montreal QC, Canada

  15. Symms M (2004) A review of structural magnetic resonance neuroimaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:1235–1244. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2003.032714

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Plantinga BR, Temel Y, Roebroeck A et al (2014) Ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging of the basal ganglia and related structures. Front Hum Neurosci 8

  17. Nayak KS, Lim Y, Campbell-Washburn AE, Steeden J (2022) Real-time magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 55:81–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim Y-C, Hayes CE, Narayanan SS, Nayak KS (2011) Novel 16-channel receive coil array for accelerated upper airway MRI at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22742

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lingala SG, Zhu Y, Kim Y et al (2017) A fast and flexible MRI system for the study of dynamic vocal tract shaping. Magn Reson Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26090

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hon Tat Hui (2008) Decoupling methods for the mutual coupling effect in antenna arrays: a review. Recent Patents Eng 1:187–193. https://doi.org/10.2174/187221207780832200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Campbell-Washburn AE, Ramasawmy R, Restivo MC et al (2019) Opportunities in interventional and diagnostic imaging by using high-performance low-field-strength MRI. Radiology 293:384–393. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019190452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC et al (2006) User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31:1116–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Roemer PB, Edelstein WA, Hayes CE et al (1990) The NMR phased array. Magn Reson Med 16:192–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910160203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kellman P, McVeigh ER (2005) Image reconstruction in SNR units: a general method for SNR measurement. Magn Reson Med 54:1439–1447. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20713

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Bö P, Boesiger P (2001) Advances in Sensitivity Encoding With Arbitrary k-Space Trajectories

  26. Akcakaya M, Basha TA, Manning WJ, Nezafat R (2014) Efficient calculation of g-factors for CG-SENSE in high dimensions: noise amplification in random undersampling. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 16:W28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429x-16-s1-w28

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. De Zwart JA, Ledden PJ, Van Gelderen P et al (2004) Signal-to-noise ratio and parallel imaging performance of a 16-channel receive-only brain coil array at 3.0 tesla. Magn Reson Med 51:22–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fujita H, Zheng T, Yang X et al (2013) RF surface receive array coils: the art of an LC circuit: RF surface receive array coils. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:12–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Corea JR, Lechene PB, Lustig M, Arias AC (2017) Materials and methods for higher performance screen-printed flexible MRI receive coils: high-performance screen-printed flexible MRI receive coils. Magn Reson Med 78:775–783. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hoult DI (1969) Lauterbur PC (1979) The sensitivity of the zeugmatographic experiment involving human samples. J Magn Reson 34:425–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(79)90019-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Giovannetti G, Hartwig V, Landini L, Santarelli MF (2012) Classical and lateral skin effect contributions estimation in strip MR coils. Concepts Magn Reson 41B:57–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmr.b.21210

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge grant support from the National Science Foundation (#1828736) and research support from Siemens Healthineers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Muñoz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Sophia Cui is an employee of Siemens Healthcare.

Ethical standards

All procedures involving human subjects were in accordance with the local ethics board.

Informed  consent

Written informed consent was obtained in all cases.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

An example of real-time speech production imaging with the custom upper airway coil. The data were acquired while the subject was counting from 1 to 5 at normal and then speeded rates. Imaging was performed with a spiral-based balanced steady-state free precession pulse sequence with parameters: TR: 5.3 ms, flip angle: 35˚, FOV: 28cm2, slice thickness: 6 mm, in-plane spatial resolution: 2.3x2.3 mm2, and temporal resolution: 10.6 ms/frame. The image series was reconstructed using a sparse SENSE reconstruction with a temporal finite difference constraint (acceleration factor = 6.5) Supplementary file1 (MP4 8551 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muñoz, F., Lim, Y., Cui, S.X. et al. Evaluation of a novel 8-channel RX coil for speech production MRI at 0.55 T. Magn Reson Mater Phy 36, 419–426 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-022-01036-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-022-01036-0

Keywords

Navigation