Journal of General Plant Pathology

, Volume 84, Issue 3, pp 243–245 | Cite as

Detection and identification of a ‘Candidatus phytoplasma aurantifolia’-related strain (16SrII-A subgroup) associated with corchorus aestuans phyllody in China

Disease Note
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

In September 2015, a phyllody that is typical of phytoplasma infection was observed on Corchorus aestuans plants in Haikou, Hainan Province, China. Total DNA from symptomatic and asymptomatic plants was extracted for molecular diagnosis. On the basis of sequence analysis and phylogenetic trees based on 16S rDNA and rp genes, the phyllody phytoplasma was ascertained to be related to ‘Candidatus phytoplasma aurantifolia’. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a phytoplasma infecting C. aestuans in the world.

Keywords

Corchorus aestuans phyllody phytoplasma Phylogenetic tree Candidatus phytoplasma aurantifolia’-related strain 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Haiyan Che at the Environment and Plant Protection Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences for supplying the material infected with pigeon pea witches’-broom phytoplasma. This work was supported by the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 2016M601190).

References

  1. Bertaccini A, Duduk B, Paltrinieri S, Contaldo N (2014) Phytoplasmas and phytoplasma diseases: a severe threat to agriculture. Am J Plant Sci 5:1763–1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biswas C, Dey P, Bera A, Kumar M, Satpathy S (2014) First report of a 16SrV-C phytoplasma causing little leaf and bunchy top of tossa jute (Corchorus olitorius) in India. Plant Dis 98:565–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Che HY, Luo DQ, Rui-Yi FU, Wu YF (2010) Molecular detection and identification of a phytoplasma associated with pigeon pea witches’-broom disease in Hainan Province, China. Acta Phytopathol Sin 40:113–121Google Scholar
  4. Deng S, Hiruki C (1991) Amplification of 16S rRNA genes from culturable and nonculturable Mollicutes. J Microbiol Meth 14:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Favali MA, Musetti R, Benvenuti S, Bianchi A, Pressacco L (2004) Catharanthus roseus L. plants and explants infected with phytoplasmas: alkaloid production and structural observations. Protoplasma 223:45–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gundersen-Rindal DE, Lee IM (1996) Ultrasensitive detection of phytoplasmas by nested-PCR assays using two universal primer pairs. Phytopathol Mediterr 3:144–151Google Scholar
  7. Khan MSY, Bano S, Javed K, Mueed MA (2006) A comprehensive review on the chemistry and pharmacology of Corchorus species—a source of cardiac glycosides, triterpenoids, ionones, flavonoids, coumarins, steroids and some other compounds. J Sci Ind Res 65:283–298Google Scholar
  8. Lee IM, Gundersen-Rindal DE, Davis RE, Bartoszyk IM (1998) Revised classification scheme of phytoplasmas based on RFLP analyses of 16S rRNA and ribosomal protein gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Micr 48:1153–1169Google Scholar
  9. Lee IM, Davis RE, Gundersen-Rindal DE (2000) Phytoplasma: phytopathogenic Mollicutes. Annu Rev Microbiol 54:221–255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee IM, Gundersen-Rindal DE, Davis RE, Bottner KD, Marcone C, Seemüller E (2004) ‘Candidatus phytoplasma asteris’, a novel phytoplasma taxon associated with aster yellows and related diseases. Int J Syst Evol Micr 54:1037–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martini M, Lee IM, Bottner KD, Zhao Y, Botti S, Bertaccini A, Harrison NA, Carraro L, Marcone C, Khan AJ, Osler R (2007) Ribosomal protein gene-based phylogeny for finer differentiation and classification of phytoplasmas. Int J Syst Evol Micr 57:2037–2051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Özdemir Z, Cagirgan MI (2015) Identification and characterization of a phytoplasma disease of jute (Corchorus olitorius L.) from south-western Turkey. Crop Prot 74:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schneider B, Seemuller E, Smart CD, Kirkpatrick BC (1995) Phylogenetic classification of plant pathogenic mycoplasma like organism or phytoplasma. In: Razin R, Tully JG (eds) Molecular and diagnostic procedures in mycoplasmology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 369–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Seemüller E, Schneider B, Mäurer R, Ahrens U, Daire X, Kison H, Lorenz KH, Firrao G, Avinent L, Sears BB (1994) Phylogenetic classification of phytopathogenic Mollicutes by sequence analysis of 16S ribosomal DNA. Int J Syst Evol Micr 44:440–446Google Scholar
  15. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Phytopathological Society of Japan and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oil Crops Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetics Improvement of Oil CropsMinistry of AgricultureWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations